The 2010s: When the Media Lost Their Gatekeepers
Media theorist Marshall McLuhan's work best explains how the world changed in the 2010s—and what we can expect in the decade ahead.
Media theorist Marshall McLuhan's work best explains how the world changed in the 2010s—and what we can expect in the decade ahead.
A company had a trademark canceled in a Trademark Trial & Appeal Board proceeding, based on what the Board described as the company's "delaying tactics, including the willful disregard of Board orders." The TTABlog posted about it, and some commenters criticized the company's lawyer, Ohio State Prof. Charles L. (Lee) Thomason—so he is suing them for libel.
A judge concluded that the restrictions violate the state constitution's free speech guarantee.
Just in case you had any doubts about that.
Now that's being tough on crime.
Plus: Christianity Today rejects Trump, retirement savings restrictions loosened, Nigerian sex work decriminalized, and more...
More on Doe v. Mckesson, the Baton Rouge Black Lives Matter case.
the Baton Rouge Black Lives Matter case (in which Judge Don Willett has just switched to dissenting, and in which a cert. petition has been filed with the U.S. Supreme Court).
The case, in which Judge Don Willett has just switched to dissenting, should be an easy win for DeRay Mckesson—but on a theory that hadn't been asserted in court.
Her lobbying tax proposal is pseudo-policy, a veneer of wonky seriousness over dubious populist dogma.
"Steve Farzam, chief operating officer of the Shore Hotel [in Santa Monica], ... [has] been charged with counterfeiting a Los Angeles County Superior Court seal."
The case for a technical free speech fix
Speech was more varied and vibrant than ever before—and then the backlash began.
The greatest threat to protections for our freedom may be people's fear that people who disagree with them are exercising their rights.
Sharyn Rothstein's sharp new play is a smart and timely look at how to balance free speech and privacy in a wired age.
Erroneous reporting set off a bizarre backlash that obscured the real problem.
The ACLU of Washington speaks out.
"I think if we decide we’re just going to immediately hair-trigger cancel anything that might make anyone uncomfortable, we’re missing a chance to teach.”
But any such cancellation would violate the First Amendment, because it would involve viewpoint discrimination in a place opened by the government to private speech.
Conservatives are wrong on policy, and really wrong on facts
The ex-wife had withdrawn her complaint before the court took any substantive action, under circumstances that cast doubt on its accuracy; because of that, a Virginia court agreed that it should be sealed.
Today's censors are using tech policy and social-media outrage to attack your right to think and say what you believe.
Gutting the trade deal would make it easier to strip our speech protections here at home.
Since FOSTA passed in 2018, "sex workers have faced increased violence" and "have been forced onto the streets," the California congressman says.
"CNN is the mother of fake news," reads the introduction to Nunes' new lawsuit.
“If the Court is serious about protecting freedom of expression, we should grant review.”
Singapore ordered Facebook to attach a "false information" message to a news story written by a government critic.
American government agencies (federal, state, and local) can't sue for libel, the Supreme Court has held; but what about foreign countries, or Indian tribes?
Assessment of motives is often an essential tool for protecting our constitutional rights.
"We must remain—especially now—vigilant to any form of discrimination," said National Louis University in a dumb statement.
Bias incident reports, safety concerns, and harassment charges, all because of a slightly trollish Facebook post.
even if there is such a right to videorecord on public streets, holds a federal district court.
The Reason Roundtable panelists ask: Why so many hawks in the anti-Trump clump?
Warning: These are trained litigants; don't try this at home.
The comedian thinks misleading information on social media is ruining society. That's a bit rich, coming from him.
She also frantically tried to find him, and she alerted his family once she knew where he was.
Democratic presidential hopeful Andrew Yang thinks so.
"While such documents may be unflattering to Defendant's business, Defendant has not satisfied the burden of showing that the documents are proprietary in nature. Nor has Defendant satisfied the burden necessary to show that any interest in maintaining secrecy is outweighed by the presumption of access."
Instead of its economy becoming more liberal, its polity is growing more illiberal.
Episode 8 of Free Speech Rules by UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh
Criminal charges were eventually dropped, and the civil lawsuit has just been thrown out.
Progressive activists want the newspaper to stop practicing balanced journalism.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.