Cop Who Fired Blindly Into Breonna Taylor's Home Is Convicted of Violating Her Constitutional Rights
Former Louisville detective Brett Hankison is one of four officers who faced federal charges after a deadly 2020 drug raid.

Louisville, Kentucky, police did a lot of questionable things before, during, and after the March 2020 drug raid that killed Breonna Taylor, a 26-year-old EMT and aspiring nurse. Their lapses included a misleading, legally deficient search warrant affidavit; a reckless, middle-of-the-night home invasion that led to a lethal confrontation; and a conspiracy to cover up the misrepresentations that preceded the raid. But the most baffling aspect of the incident was Detective Brett Hankison's decision to blindly fire 10 rounds from outside Taylor's apartment through a bedroom window and a sliding glass door that were covered by blinds and curtains.
On Friday, after deliberating for more than 20 hours over three days, a federal jury in Louisville convicted Hankison of willfully violating Taylor's Fourth Amendment rights under color of law by firing five rounds through the bedroom window. Although none of the bullets struck Taylor, federal prosecutors argued that Hankison endangered her life by unlawfully using deadly force.
Because the charge "involved the use of a dangerous weapon and an attempt to kill," Hankison faces a maximum sentence of life in prison. The jury acquitted him of a second count under the same statute, which alleged that he violated the constitutional rights of Taylor's neighbors, who were endangered by bullets that penetrated their apartment.
Hankison, who was fired from his job with the Louisville Metro Police Department in June 2020, is the only officer directly involved in the raid to be convicted of a crime. In March 2022, a state jury acquitted him of wanton endangerment, a charge based on the same use of force. Hankison was indicted on federal civil rights charges five months later. Last year, his first prosecution on those charges ended with a mistrial after jurors failed to reach a verdict.
During his second federal trial, Hankison again testified that he was trying to help two fellow officers inside Taylor's apartment, Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly and Detective Myles Cosgrove, thinking they were under sustained fire. Here is what was actually happening, as described in a Justice Department press release about Hankison's conviction:
During the execution of the warrant at Taylor's home, officers knocked on Taylor's door and announced themselves as police at approximately 12:45 a.m. No one answered the door, and the officers saw no indication that anyone in the home was awake or had heard their announcement. The police then rammed the door open and Taylor's boyfriend, believing that intruders were breaking in, fired his handgun one time at officers, two of whom fired back, hitting and killing Taylor.
Taylor's boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, has consistently said he heard no announcement and had no idea the intruders who had broken into the apartment were police officers. He was initially charged with attempted murder of a police officer, but prosecutors dropped that charge two months later, implicitly conceding that Walker had a strong self-defense claim. The bullet he fired struck Mattingly in the leg. In response, Mattingly and Cosgrove fired a total of 22 rounds down a dark hallway, where Taylor, who was unarmed, was standing near Walker.
Hankison, who could not see what was happening because he had moved from the doorway to the side of the apartment, testified that he mistook his colleagues' hail of bullets for gunfire from a semi-automatic rifle. "I saw those windows and doors lighting up," he said. "It looked like there was a strobe light in there….In my mind, an AR-15 is being shot, and it sounds like it's getting closer and louder." He added that it "sounded like a semiautomatic rifle making its way down the hallway and executing everybody."
Even so, Hankison's response is hard to fathom, since he had no way of knowing who might be hit by his rounds. The Associated Press notes that "several witnesses, including Louisville's police chief," testified that Hankison "violated Louisville police policy that requires officers to identify a target before firing."
Defense attorney Don Malarcik nevertheless insisted that Hankison had done nothing wrong. "He did exactly what he was supposed to do," Malarcik told the jurors during his closing argument. "He was acting to save lives."
Not so, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Songer. Hankison "violated one of the most fundamental rules of deadly force," Songer told the jury. "If they cannot see the person they're shooting at, they cannot pull the trigger."
According to Yvette Gentry, Louisville's former interim police chief, Cosgrove—who fired 16 rounds into the apartment, including the one that killed Taylor—did something similar. Gentry canned Cosgrove in December 2020, saying he had fired "in three distinctly different directions," which indicated he "did not identify a target" and instead "fired in a manner consistent with suppressive fire, which is in direct contradiction to our training, values and policy."
Like Hankison, Cosgrove said he mistook police gunfire (Mattingly's) for incoming rounds. He told investigators he was "overwhelmed with bright flashes and darkness," which led him to believe "there's still these gunshots happening due to those bright lights." Cosgrove, who later found work as a sheriff's deputy in Carroll County, Kentucky, suggested that he fired his gun without thinking. "I just sensed that I've fired," he said. "It's like a surreal thing. If you told me I didn't do something at that time, I'd believe you. If you told me I did do something, I'd probably believe you, too."
An investigation by Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron nevertheless concluded that both Cosgrove and Mattingly had fired in self-defense, meaning that criminal charges were not justified. The fact that Walker also seems to have fired in self-defense underlines the recklessness of the "dynamic entry" tactics that police reflexively used in this case.
Taylor's death inspired extensive local protests and became a leading exhibit for the Black Lives Matter movement, along with George Floyd's death in Minneapolis two months later. In September 2020, the city of Louisville agreed to a $12 million settlement of a lawsuit filed by Taylor's family. But except for Hankison's unsuccessful prosecution, the raid did not result in any state charges.
The Justice Department, by contrast, obtained indictments against Hankison and three other current or former Louisville officers connected to the raid: former Detective Joshua Jaynes, who filed the search warrant affidavit; Sgt. Kyle Meany, who signed off on it; and Detective Kelly Goodlett, who allegedly "conspir[ed] with Jaynes to falsify the search warrant for Taylor's home and to cover up their actions afterward."
Jaynes' affidavit, which linked Taylor to a former boyfriend's drug dealing based on little more than guilt by association, "contained false and misleading statements, omitted material facts, relied on stale information, and was not supported by probable cause," the Justice Department says. Jaynes, like Hankison, is charged with willfully violating Taylor's Fourth Amendment rights. The former detective, who was fired in December 2020 for lying in his affidavit, is also charged with falsifying records in a federal investigation and with conspiracy for "agreeing with another detective to cover up the false warrant affidavit after Taylor's death by drafting a false investigative letter and making false statements to criminal investigators."
Meany faces the same civil rights charge. He is also charged with making a false statement to federal investigators by claiming that police sought a no-knock search warrant for Taylor's apartment because the police department's SWAT unit had requested it.
Goodlett, the detective who allegedly conspired with Jaynes, pleaded guilty in August 2022, a few weeks after her indictment. Jaynes and Meany have not been tried yet. Last August, a federal judge dismissed enhanced civil rights charges against them, rejecting the claim that their alleged misconduct "involved the use of a dangerous weapon" or "resulted in Taylor's death." Jaynes and Meany were re-indicted in light of that ruling last month.
"Brett Hankison was found guilty by a jury of his peers for willfully depriving Breonna Taylor of her constitutional rights," Attorney General Merrick B. Garland said on Friday. "His use of deadly force was unlawful and put Ms. Taylor in harm's way." Although "this verdict is an important step toward accountability for the violation of Breonna Taylor's civil rights," Garland added, "justice for the loss of Ms. Taylor is a task that exceeds human capacity."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hankison, who was fired from his job with the Louisville Metro Police Department in June 2020, is the only officer directly involved in the raid to be convicted of a crime. In March 2022, a state jury acquitted him of wanton endangerment, a charge based on the same use of force. Hankison was indicted on federal civil rights charges five months later.
So is now the time to start asking questions about double jeopardy? Government said, "Wait, he was acquitted! Better charge him again over the same act." And then they did.
When police and prosecutors stop using the dual-jurisdiction-prosecutions to get that second bite at the apple on the rest of us, I'll consider worrying about double-jeopardy for them. Until then, they invented this abusive interpretation so they can stay subject to it.
I might go in the reverse. If the government is going to abuse the rights of people who WORK for the government, what chance do the rest of us have?
Hankison probably should been convicted on a recklessness standard in the first go. But sometimes criminals get off. OJ didn't get convicted of murdering Nicole Simpson, Casey Anthony didn't get convicted of murdering her daughter. This whole "dual sovereignty" doctrine is just violating the fifth amendment by way of the 10th amendment. If the alleged violation falls under the purview of state law it then is off limits for federal law.
Okay just hold up. OJ has devoted every waking hour to finding the real killer.
'Had'.
Somebody murdered OJ? Buy my self published book If I Did It.
Look how well that worked out!
I would take a look the Seventh Amendment:
"no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law"
Just as ambiguous as "shall not be infringed" !
Nope. Killing her is not the same act as filing a false affidavit and depriving her of her Constitutional right to due process. The fourth amendment is specifically intended to be used against officials who abuse their power, as they most certainly did in this case. The fact that the state refuses to enforce the constitutional rights of their own citizens is, by extension, official abuse of power.
Killing her is not the same act as filing a false affidavit and depriving her of her Constitutional right to due process.
Wrong guy. The investigation and the affidavit were the work of a different police detective who was hitting a drop house on that same day. The same actions he was acquitted of at the state level are the actions he was indicted for federally.
Whether or not he's a fucking asshole, he has the same rights we all do. It's important to defend even the rights of absolute scumbags because you never know when the state might decide you are such a scumbag.
Stop and think for one second. You are assuming sullum isn't a lying sac of shit by quoting him
Same act - different crime and jurisdiction.
Following the great traditions of Ruby Ridge.
The later Justice task force criticized Horiuchi for firing through the door, when he did not know if anyone was on the other side of it. While there is a dispute as to who approved the rules of engagement which Horiuchi followed, the task force condemned the rules of engagement that allowed shots to be fired without a request for surrender.
Unless I read it wrong, the acquittal was wanton endangerment filed by the neighbors for firing blinding into the walls. This was a separate case from wanton endangerment filed on behalf of Breonna and therefore not double jeopardy.
https://reason.com/2022/03/04/a-jury-concludes-that-blindly-firing-10-rounds-into-breonna-taylors-apartment-was-not-wanton-endangerment/
"Hankison faced three charges of wanton endangerment, one for each of the people in the apartment next to Taylor's: Cody Etherton, Chelsey Napper (who was pregnant at the time), and her 5-year-old son. The charges, which are punishable by up to five years in prison for each count, alleged that Hankison "wantonly engage[d] in conduct which create[d] a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person" in circumstances that indicated an "extreme indifference to the value of human life."
>>On Friday, after deliberating for more than 20 hours over three days
20 hours! someone in the room did not know going in how federal juries operate
>>a federal jury in Louisville convicted Hankison of willfully violating Taylor's Fourth Amendment rights under color of law by firing five rounds through the bedroom window.
those are some seriously special bullets to violate 4A
>>Although none of the bullets struck Taylor
life in prison for no harm no foul under AG Garland lol.
I thought he had a gun ... I feared for my life ... so I shot up the entire neighborhood hoping to blindly hit a bad guy ... fortunately I'm such a bad shot I missed!
While I agree with the double jeopardy issues, this case is far more agregious than the George Floyd case. We're building statues and monuments to that Christ like figure. Tayler didn't die of an overdose. It was cold blooded murder.
^this
There is a Capitol officer from J6 who got a medal for firing blindly.
And the police, naturally, charged the guy who was defending against home intruders in a crime-ridden neighborhood before he fled and called 911. He fired one single shot.
"But the most baffling aspect of the incident was Detective Brett Hankison's decision to blindly fire 10 rounds from outside Taylor's apartment through a bedroom window and a sliding glass door that were covered by blinds and curtains."
I don't think that this is any more baffling than Felipe Gallegos firing blindly into a home in Houston killing Rhogena Nicholas and likely wounding four of his fellow drug warriors.
Wait, we know the name of the guy who fired the shots in that case? I never learned that. I thought all the cops just mag-dumped everywhere.
Ban raids on houses.
Timing is everything. In another few months he'd have had total immunity.
Not too late for a pardon. Just sayin' ...
Hunter has a couple of months left. I'm thinking it will be a Christmas gift to unify the country.
How?
It's just a joke based on the likely event of a Trump win and his unlikely to follow through on campaign promise.
Ahh, thought I’d missed something.
While I agree with the keystone cop mistakes associated with this tragedy, I don't see how this conviction won't be overturned. If you examine the volumes of cases that reinforced the "scared cope rule", this would easily fall into those categories.
A day in the life of Joe random black guy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqb4UQa3c9g