Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Coronavirus

Philadelphia Ordered Restaurants Closed. Then the City's Mayor Went Out To Eat in Maryland.

Public officials are routinely undermining the legitimacy of coronavirus countermeasures by ignoring their own (often arbitrary) rules.

Eric Boehm | 9.1.2020 1:25 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
sipaphotosten914466 | Chan Long Hei / SOPA Images/Sipa/Newscom
(Chan Long Hei / SOPA Images/Sipa/Newscom)

Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney publicly apologized on Monday after he was busted for sneaking across the border to enjoy a meal at a Maryland restaurant over the weekend.

Restaurants and bars in Maryland are allowed to offer limited indoor dining—capacity is capped at 25 percent of what would normally be allowed in an attempt to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Establishments elsewhere in Pennsylvania are operating under similar restrictions as well. But in Philadelphia, indoor dining is still fully forbidden under restrictions imposed by the city government—the one that Kenney runs. The city's ban on indoor dining, which was extended in late July amid fears of a "second wave" of COVID-19 cases in Philadelphia, is scheduled to be lifted on September 8.

But Kenney apparently couldn't wait that long. A sharp-eyed restaurant-goer caught Kenney dining indoors in Maryland on Sunday. The photo quickly went viral, and Kenney's office confirmed to a local TV station that the mayor had gone south of the border to visit "a restaurant owned by a friend."

Source: Instagram (@MarcVetri)

On Monday, Kenney issued a more substantial apology via his Twitter account. "I felt the risk was low because the county I visited has had fewer than 800 COVID-19 cases, compared to over 33,000 cases in Philadelphia," he wrote. "Restaurant owners are among the hardest hit by the pandemic. I'm sorry if my decision hurt those who've worked to keep their businesses going under difficult circumstances."

Kenney is right to point out that the coronavirus risk is not the same everywhere at all times, and it certainly makes sense for different jurisdictions to adopt policies that reflect that. But his do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do approach to COVID-19 undermines the legitimacy of the harsh restrictions Philadelphia has imposed on its own restaurant industry and demonstrates a callous disregard for how those policies have impacted the city's residents and businesses. Kenney can drive across the border to Maryland easily, but a Philly bar can't pick up and move to Delaware to escape the city's lockdowns.

If nothing else, Philadelphia's ban on indoor dining certainly fails what I'd call the Burgermeister Meisterburger Yo-Yo Test—a reference, of course, to a memorable scene in the most libertarian Christmas movie ever made. The test is a simple one: If a public official can't avoid breaking his or her own laws—even, as in Kenney's case, the spirit of the law—then they're probably bad laws.

Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has created fertile ground for arbitrary and meaningless restrictions on economic activity. Worse, it's not clear that lockdowns have helped curb the spread of the virus. As Reason's Jacob Sullum noted last week, both Arizona and Georgia have seen COVID-19 cases decline by roughly the same degree in recent weeks despite adopting far different strategies in July—Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey ordered gyms, bars, movie theaters, and water parks to close and imposed strict limitations on restaurants, while Georgia mostly allowed people to decide for themselves whether it was safe to go out.

The pandemic has also created an opportunity for public officials to meddle in even sillier ways, like when New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, told bars they couldn't serve alcohol without also selling food—and then tried to regulate what types of food actually counted as, well, food. He's also threatened to ban not only indoor dining but also outdoor dining in New York state, which would likely condemn thousands of restaurants to failure. There is no clear public health benefit to any of that.

Bars and restaurants were always going to have a hard time surviving the pandemic as more people voluntarily socially distanced and cut back on their spending in the wake of an economic downturn; public officials should avoid making the crisis worse with arbitrary rules. And if you can't resist playing with a yo-yo, maybe don't make it illegal for your constituents to do the same.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Poll: Americans Worry COVID-19 Vaccine Approval Is Politicized

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

CoronavirusPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaMarylandRegulationRestaurants
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (85)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fats of Fury   5 years ago

    Did he have a soda pop with his meal?

    1. Unicorn Abattoir   5 years ago

      He was in Maryland, so maybe. He couldn't afford to have a soda in Philly.

      1. Commenter_XY   5 years ago

        Drunky McMayor (his nickname in Philly) most certainly did not have soda pop with his meal; Drunky McMayor's meal time drinks are measured by proof.

        1. tangith   5 years ago

          I make up to $90 an hour on-line from my home. My story is that I give up operating at walmart to paintings on-line and with a bit strive I with out problem supply in spherical $40h to $86h…TGb someone turned into top to me by way of manner of sharing this hyperlink with me, so now i’m hoping i ought to help a person else accessible through sharing this hyperlink…

          strive it, you HERE?..... http://Cashapp1.com

      2. tlapp   5 years ago

        A hypocrite and a tax evader at the same time.

    2. Chipper Morning Wood---------------------   5 years ago

      What the hell is a soda pop?

      1. Unicorn Abattoir   5 years ago

        It's what people in New York and Bawston call soda.

        1. Brandybuck   5 years ago

          In parts of the South they call it a "coke" even if it's Pepsi.

          1. blondrealist   5 years ago

            Does anybody call them "soft drinks" any more?

            1. Quo Usque Tandem   5 years ago

              Coledrink. They're called coledrinks.

              1. pabasaya   5 years ago

                I am making 70 to 60 dollar par hour at home on laptop ,, This is make happy But now i am Working 4 hour Dailly and make 400 dollar Easily .. This is enough for me to happy my family..how ?? i am making this so u can do it Easily…

                ==========► Click here

            2. Mother's lament   5 years ago

              Western Canada they're usually called "pop".

            3. Brandybuck   5 years ago

              My mom called them soft drinks. My grandma called them pop.

              In my neck of the woods we just call them sodas.

    3. youyoushoy   5 years ago

      I am making 70 to 60 dollar par hour at home on laptop ,, This is make happy But now i am Working 4 hour Dailly and make 400 dollar Easily ..GFb This is enough for me to happy my family..how ?? i am making this so u can do it Easily…
      ==========► Read more

    4. online jobs   5 years ago

      I am making 70 to 60 dollar par hour at home on laptop ,, This is make happy But now i am Working 4 hour Dailly and make 400 dollar Easily ..YVd This is enough for me to happy my family..how ?? i am making this so u can do it Easily…COPY HERE====Money90

  2. Don't look at me!   5 years ago

    Got a nice window seat too.

    1. Formerly Cynical Asshole   5 years ago

      I'm sure he managed to slip in a "do you know who I am?" to the hostess to ensure he got a good table.

    2. primenumbergrrl   5 years ago

      Well in retrospect, it might have been better for him to have worn a mask and sat in a dark corner

    3. Don't look at me!   5 years ago

      Oh yeah, and Pelosi went to a hair salon in San Francisco. Without a mask. Hair salons are closed in San Francisco. Well, for normal people they are.

      1. Jefferson Voltaire   5 years ago

        Nasty Pelosi needs a lot more then a hair salon.

      2. BillyG   5 years ago

        And here's the link for any Libs who would gripe about the lack of evidence.

        https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-san-francisco-hair-salon-owner-calls-it-slap-in-the-face

      3. tlapp   5 years ago

        I'm waiting for her Son in Law Governor Newsom have her fined for violating his state order.

  3. Ra's al Gore   5 years ago

    We are expected to obey arbitrary total economic control while wearing masks that hide our individual identities and thinking of each other as deadly disease risk cause we're all so dumb.

    Obey the state without question and think of other individuals as an interchangeable, indistinguishable, amorphous blob of stupidity and threats.

    Welcome to Socialist Utopia.

    1. Nardz   5 years ago

      ^

  4. Longtobefree   5 years ago

    Typical Eric; leave out the most significant fact.
    This lying weasel is a democrat.
    The party that wants to rule every aspect of our lives while having a free pass on anything they do. The party that want to destroy every individual freedom, and force all individual businessmen into an employee status, with strong nudging into union servitude.

  5. Dillinger   5 years ago

    Ruling Class sucks.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   5 years ago

    BREAKING NEWS: FILTHACRAPIA ELECTS A-HOLE AS MAYOR

  7. Unicorn Abattoir   5 years ago

    "I felt the risk was low because as a leftist politician, I am above the people's laws the county I visited has had fewer than 800 COVID-19 cases, compared to over 33,000 cases in Philadelphia,"

  8. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

    I don't see hypocrisy as undermining the credibility of lockdowns anywhere near as much as the facts--and let's review the facts:

    1) The unemployment rates for July of 2020:

    The unemployment rate in New York is 15.9%
    The unemployment rate in California is 13.9%.

    They had mandatory lockdowns in both states.

    The unemployment rate for July of 2020 in Utah is 4.5%.

    They had no mandatory lockdown in Utah.

    2) Urbanization.

    New York has an urbanization rate of 87.9%
    California has an urbanization rate of 95.0%

    Utah has an urbanization rate of 90.6%.

    So, if we're looking at Utah and think it has a lower infection rate because Utah's population is more rural, that doesn't really hold up. Utah is near the median between New York and California in terms of urbanization.

    3) Infection rates

    New York has had 1,799 cases per 100,000 people.
    California has had 1,780 cases per 100,000 people.

    Utah has had 1,670 cases per 100,000 people.

    That's from the CDC

    https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases

    Despite not having any mandatory lockdown, Utah has fewer cases per 100,000 people than New York or California--both of which implemented mandatory lockdowns early, made them harsh, and made them last for a long time.

    So what did New York's and California's mandatory lockdowns get them other than an unemployment rate that's about three times the size of Utah's?

    The hypocrisy of politicians is the last reason to oppose mandatory lockdowns. The assumption that sacrificing the economy is worth it if it means keeping the infection rate down doesn't appear to have any factual basis. Even if the mayor of Philadelphia weren't a hypocrite, the numbers speak against locking the economy down.

    1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

      Urbanization rates:

      https://www.icip.iastate.edu/tables/population/urban-pct-states

      Somebody please show me where I'm wrong.

    2. I, Woodchipper   5 years ago

      They had no mandatory lockdown in Utah.

      I don't believe this is accurate. They shut down all the schools and closed all indoor restaurants. The Mormon church (half the state) closed all their services and their buildings for ANY use.

      1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

        Doing some hunting, it appears that there was no state wide mandatory lock down in Utah.

        Utah appears to have allowed their counties to put lockdowns in place, and some of them chose to do so. According to this website, Salt Lake County (which comprises the Salt Lake City metropolitan area) had a mandatory lockdown between March 30 and April 13--for two weeks.

        https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/here-are-stay-home-orders-across-country-n1168736

        That is nothing compared to what they did in California and New York. I maintain that the primary cause of the difference in huge rates of unemployment remains the severity and length of the lockdowns--and that the lack of a significant difference in their infection rates is despite the lockdowns.

        If schools, churches, and restaurants electively chose to close themselves in Utah, that's hardly an argument against lockdowns. The fact that people are free to close themselves down regardless of whether the government forces them to close is an argument against lockdowns.

        1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

          Typo in that last part:

          "If schools, churches, and restaurants electively chose to close themselves in Utah, that’s hardly an argument against [for] lockdowns. The fact that people are free to close themselves down regardless of whether the government forces them to close is an argument against lockdowns.

          ----Ken Shultz

          Fixed!

          The point is that schools, churches, and restaurants would have been free to close themselves in New York and California without a statewide mandatory lockdown, too. Plenty of restaurants might well have willingly kept themselves closed due to the lack of customers. I'm not saying that the unemployment rate wouldn't have gone up at all if it hadn't been for the mandatory statewide lockdowns in New York and California. I'm saying that the unemployment rate is worse than it would have been otherwise if it weren't for the statewide lockdowns.

          P.S. Seeing progressives fault President Trump for refusing to implement mandatory lockdowns nationwide is absurd given these statistics. New York and California have some of the worst unemployment rates in the country right now. Why would we be better off if the unemployment rate were as high as New York's and California's nationally? This is just New York and California progressives imagining that the rest of the country wants to be like them--for some strange reason that has a lot to do with their own delusions and little to do with reality.

          1. Sevo   5 years ago

            "...Seeing progressives fault President Trump for refusing to implement mandatory lockdowns nationwide is absurd given these statistics. New York and California have some of the worst unemployment rates in the country right now..."

            Further, Idaho is NOT CA or NY;

    3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   5 years ago

      "Utah is near the median between New York and California in terms of urbanization."

      Someone who uses "median" with two figures is probably trying to look smarter than the average statistician.

      1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

        It's near the middle between the two states!

        Is that your only objection?

      2. Brandybuck   5 years ago

        You can tell the number is accurate because it has multiple decimal places!

        1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

          I hope the point is getting across that Utah is roughly comparable in terms of its urbanization rate--regardless of whether I used the word "median".

          1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   5 years ago

            I hope the point is getting across that some words are wrong, pointing them out is not wrong, and having a good laugh is important.

            Perhaps I should have said that people who mistakenly use "median" when they mean "average", especially when there are only two samples and "median" is meaningless, tend to take themselves too seriously and need to develop a sense of humor.

            1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

              Actually, we're not talking a discrete function here, are we? This isn't a deck of cards where there are no numbers between ten and a Jack. This isn't a dice roll where there are no numbers between two and three. Percentages are continuous within their bounds--like length, weight, and time. A statistician would insist on integration. Just because we round them does that mean there aren't an infinite number of percentages between . . ?

              Anyway, the lower bound is New York's 87.9% and the upper bound is California's 95.0%. The median is 91.5%--and Utah is near that at 90.6%. Medians don't stop being medians in a continuous function because they have one lower and one upper bound. Aren't we bound by the percentages rather than the number of states? Regardless, there are 47 states we haven't mentioned, and, by my eye, there are seven or eight states that also land in that range between New York and California in terms of their urbanization percentages.

              The point was that Utah shouldn't be excluded as an apple because of its urbanization rate. It's well within the apple range.

              In terms of having a sense of humor, I'm fucking hilarious and women find me irresistible.

              1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   5 years ago

                No. "Median" refers to the middle of a list. It's one of the numbers in the list.

                1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

                  Thank you.

                2. Enquirer   5 years ago

                  “No. “Median” refers to the middle of a list. It’s one of the numbers in the list.”

                  The middle of the list yes, but it might not be one of the numbers if there’s an even number of numbers. In that case, it’s the average of the two numbers in the middle. And the numbers must be in sequence (whether ascending or descending).

                  But I agree that these are minor points, we should rather be concentrating on infection rates and unemployment rates.

                  1. maderid   5 years ago

                    Make $6,000-$8,000 A Month Online With No Prior Experience Or Skills Required.CMs Be Your Own Boss And for more info visit any tab this site Thanks a lot just open this link…..

                    ========== CashApp

    4. CE   5 years ago

      Check South Dakota too.

      1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

        South Dakota did the smart thing, too, but they have a much lower urbanization rate (56.7%), and I wanted to make sure we were comparing apples to apples.

        I'm not talking about the unemployment rates in Florida, Nevada, and Hawaii, too, because their economies are so heavily dependent on tourism and they would have taken a big hit because of the lack of demand due to the virus--regardless of whether they instituted mandatory lockdowns statewide.

    5. n00bdragon   5 years ago

      Good post.

    6. Ben of Houston   5 years ago

      I think it would be better to compare California to Texas. Large ports. Texas did shut down, but we opened up early.

      Finally, the two have almost identical trends of infection. Low initial rates, and then an inflection point on the same week to a peak, and then slowly drifting down from there.

    7. BYODB   5 years ago

      This just in: a virus that originates oversea's might take a while to penetrate interior land-locked area's that no one visits voluntarily, such as Utah.

      1. Ken Shultz   5 years ago

        So you think they should have implemented polices that would have tripled their unemployment rate?

        1. BYODB   5 years ago

          No, saying that hanging your hat on anything to explain infection rates is probably a fools errand. Geographic isolation is just as likely as anything else, or simply one of a dozen variables. Not saying that Utah is super remote, people go there all the time. But I don't know how many people can get a direct flight from Utah to Wuhan Province, either.

  9. I, Woodchipper   5 years ago

    Pitchforks and torches. Run them all out of town, every single elected official.

    1. Unicorn Abattoir   5 years ago

      Take all the politicians, drop them on an island, and let them build their utopia of regulations.

      They'll all starve to death before the Life Sustaining Nourishment Acquisition bill makes it out of committee.

      1. Brandybuck   5 years ago

        Isn't that how Australia got started? Oh wait, that was thieves and murderers. Sorry to insult the thieves and murderers out there.

        1. Compelled Speechless   5 years ago

          I don't understand the difference.

          1. Fat Mike's Drug Habit   5 years ago

            Some thieves and murderers have principles.

  10. Chipper Morning Wood---------------------   5 years ago

    Christ, what an asshole.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   5 years ago

      But some assholes are more equal than other assholes.

  11. Brandybuck   5 years ago

    Back when I was a kid I thought the Rule of Law was a universal constant. There was a law, everyone obeyed it, and if they didn't there would be hell to play. Even if they were politicians. Even if they were Nixon. Because the idea of arbitrary rule just wouldn't fit into my naive young brain.

    Today however I don't have to wonder, everywhere I look, on both the Left and Right, it's all arbitrary rule. And usually capricious. There's no such thing as Rule of Law in this country any more.

    1. Illocust   5 years ago

      That's mostly just called growing up. Kids have a black and white view of the world. Good people vs bad people. As they get older they start realizing there are shades of grey. This person is mostly good but they also do some bad things, and this person is mostly bad but they also do some good things. It can give you the false impression that people were more likely to follow the rules than they really were, because as a kid you had trouble conceptualizing the world as any different.

  12. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

    On Monday, Kenney issued a more substantial apology via his Twitter account. "I felt the risk was low because the county I visited has had fewer than 800 COVID-19 cases, compared to over 33,000 cases in Philadelphia," he wrote. "Restaurant owners are among the hardest hit by the pandemic. I'm sorry if my decision hurt those who've worked to keep their businesses going under difficult circumstances."

    Not an apology.

    1. Under_Pressure   5 years ago

      Right, it's more an explanation, of how- believe it or not- individuals can rationally assess a situation and make their own choices and choose their own level of risk. Amazing! Too bad the good mayor doesn't think that his constituents have the capability of making the same assessments, so he needs to make the decisions for them.

      Much like Fauci when he was at the Nationals game with his wife and friend with his mask off. He gave a whole explanation about how in those circumstances it was fine and the risk was minimal and etc. All of which was completely logical and correct to anyone with a bit of intelligence- no reasonable person argued that this was evidence that covid didn't even exist and Fauci knew it was completely made up and wasn't really concerned at all about it in any scenario. Rather, it was plain to see that he was acting reasonably for the situation. But that's the whole point- Fauci and the politicians that follow him do not think that everyone ELSE should get to act as they see fit based on their assessment of risk and personal risk tolerance; THOSE people need to live under blanket rules because they are too stupid to know what's good for them. It's only the enlightened betters like Fauci that get to decide what is appropriate for a given circumstance.

    2. nola70113   5 years ago

      So this champion of dempanic hysteria saw nothing amiss in exhaling with his mask off during a visit to a place with a far lower per-capita rate of infection than the city where he (presumably) spends most of his time. No elevated risk of spreading the coof there. With such a beacon of Brotherly Love to enlighten it, no wonder Philadelphia is always sunny.

  13. DajjaI   5 years ago

    They push lockdowns not for public health, but cynical and hypocritical politics. The goal is to wreck the economy so people are desperate and vote for Biden. And if you say that they respond with relentless vitriolic fury. However this exposes a source of the morbidity of the virus: these people despise conservatives, religious people and Trump supporters and so would likely be careless in their presence. Perhaps they scheduled a family reunion despite a mild case of the sniffles. Perhaps they had a long intimate chat with gramps in his bedroom. But now the mortality is going down because the elderly & obese see the hatred and contempt (despite the veneer of compassion) and know to scatter when their liberal acquaintances approach.

    I hope research is done on this dynamic. Just look at political affiliations of the dead and the people who spent the most time with them.

  14. Adans smith   5 years ago

    America is a great county, any hard working, honest man can find employment. And those who aren't can go in to politics.

  15. Bender B. Rodriguez   5 years ago

    This is very similar to the current anger being exhibited in Kansas City at a school board member at one of the largest suburban districts. She sent her son to Florida in order to be eligible to play football this season, then voted to shut down the local HS football program for everyone else. She makes one choice for her kids, and then makes another choice for everyone else's kid in the entire district.
    https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-kansas-city-star/20200831/281629602660461

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   5 years ago

      Those with authority will inevitably abuse it.

      I believe we can all just accept that as given.

      1. Compelled Speechless   5 years ago

        It's the only thing more certain than gravity.

    2. Under_Pressure   5 years ago

      And new Big 10 (err, B1G) commissioner Kevin Warren- an open leftist who has made it a point to leverage the conference and it's athletes to drive "social change" through voting. Keep in mind that this is a conference with a strong presence in many of the most important swing states. The Big 10 voted to cancel the season, of course, and while the decision was ostensibly up to the university presidents, the belief is that Warren strongly encouraged this outcome. However, Warren's son plays for Mississippi State in the SEC and will be playing this season...

      1. Rufus The Monocled   5 years ago

        Now they say they plan to play after Thanksgiving or January.

        If that's not screaming politics I don't know what does.

        He's another asshole. I should write a book about public officials who revealed themselves to be shitheaded fuckheads during the pandemic.

  16. ONTIME   5 years ago

    Want to keep on being treated like your a ignorant piece of human trash, keep asking for more misery while the elite left snickers and laughs at the plight your in...They go out to dinner, in another state, on your dime, spend your hard earned money and drink on your tab, keep local biz bottled up......Keep On Voting For DIMM Elites and stop your kavetch'n...sucker......

    1. Rufus The Monocled   5 years ago

      In Brampton Ont., the Mayor shut down sports to just practices or some bull shit but he and his buddies get to play hockey.

      Patrick Brown. Look him up.

      And what does the little shit do when caught? The same old usual tired bull shit: Right wingers are a menace.

      My brother in laws nephew has to DRESS UP IN THE PARKING LOT to play in Ottawa.

      This is how retarded it has become.

      1. Jefferson Voltaire   5 years ago

        You keep taking it, they'll keep doing it. It's past time for some good old fashioned hangings.

        1. ElvisIsReal   5 years ago

          We haven't used the tar and feathers in a while, and it shows.

  17. Rufus The Monocled   5 years ago

    Of course. Naturally. Politicians are acting like typical shitheads during the pandemic.

    Same crap up here in Canada.

    The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the society. Tacitus.

  18. Ezra MacVie   5 years ago

    Even worse than Kenney's case was that of the UK's Neil Ferguson, who prescribed quarantining for people infected with Coronavirus.
    Except for himself, of course. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-52553229

  19. jack murphy   5 years ago

    today we learn that politicians are blowhard hypocrits...we are shocked...SHOCKED!

    EVERY GOVERNOR THAT HAS SHUT DOWN A STATE NEEDS TO BE TURNED OUT. the arrogant assholes are still cashing checks as they decimate families, corrupt psyches and pander and fear monger. americans are chumps to fall for the BS

  20. Michael Ejercito   5 years ago

    Public health experts already wrote that there are more important priorities.

    However, as public health advocates, we do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We support them as vital to the national public health and to the threatened health specifically of Black people in the United States. We can show that support by facilitating safest protesting practices without detracting from demonstrators' ability to gather and demand change. This should not be confused with a permissive stance on all gatherings, particularly protests against stay-home orders. Those actions not only oppose public health interventions, but are also rooted in white nationalism and run contrary to respect for Black lives. Protests against systemic racism, which fosters the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 on Black communities and also perpetuates police violence, must be supported.

    - 1200 public health experts

    http://ethicsalarms.com/2020/06/08/oh-no-its-monday-ethics-review-6-8-2020-a-yoos-rationalization-orgy/

  21. Arcxjo   5 years ago

    "I felt the risk was low because the county I visited has had fewer than 800 COVID-19 cases, compared to over 33,000 cases in Philadelphia," he wrote after carrying any communicable diseases that he might have picked up in Philadelphia across state lines.

    FTFY.

  22. Sevo   5 years ago

    Emperor Newsom shut down salons, and then that hag Pelosi got her hair done.

  23. Rastaman   5 years ago

    Liberals have still not realized their blatant hypocrisy is another of the many reasons Trump won last time!

  24. Jess Sain 2   5 years ago

    When the ruling class liberals tell you peasants what to do, you'll do it and like it. Now get back to work, his limousine driver doesn't work for free.

  25. Zirinets 2   5 years ago

    Thank you for sharing this great post. Welcome to our academic essay writing services such as reviewing the contents of the documentary. and many more

  26. CE   5 years ago

    This pitch was more appealing 6 months ago.

  27. pabasaya   5 years ago

    I am making 70 to 60 dollar par hour at home on laptop ,, This is make happy But now i am Working 4 hour Dailly and make 400 dollar Easily .. This is enough for me to happy my family..how ?? i am making this so u can do it Easily…

    ==========► Click here

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Travel Crackdown Is Hurting Americans at Home and Abroad

Matt Welch | From the August/September 2025 issue

Superman Is About the Anti-War Vibe Shift

Matthew Petti | 7.18.2025 5:23 PM

Why Are Students Using AI To Cheat? Maybe Because They Shouldn't Be In College At All

Emma Camp | 7.18.2025 4:00 PM

Although Meth Is Irresistible, The New York Times Says, Addicts Often Prefer Small Cash Rewards

Jacob Sullum | 7.18.2025 1:45 PM

ICE Is Shipping Detainees to Hawaii as Bed Space on the U.S. Mainland Fills Up

Autumn Billings | 7.18.2025 1:24 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!