Domestic Policy Falls by the Wayside in Syria War Debate
Much easier to discuss killing foreigners than to debate screwing your own constituents
Much easier to discuss killing foreigners than to debate screwing your own constituents
Rand Paul and Justin Amash have principles that trump party politics. That's exactly why they are the best hope to stop an American war on Syria.
Decades of interventionist foreign policy have eroded our freedom without making the world a safer place.
Syria is the hill to die on? Really?
Bomb first, ask questions never
Stop short of calling for military response, however
Faced heavy criticism on Syria at town halls, insisted there was "passion on both sides"
Everybody keep those boots off the ground
Air power coercion succeeds only about a third of the time
Pushing for a political solution
Bombing Syria not that popular
Spy ship was sent to the region on Monday
FreedomWorks President Matt Kibbe says, "America's international credit is more important than President Obama's rhetorical credibility."
Pentagon official says scope of any intervention has not changed
Many Americans not convinced a military strike is a good idea
Had planned to talk about immigration
Secretary of State John Kerry has warned of the risk of extremists taking over Assad's opposition without a U.S. intervention
One source told Fox News military officials have changed their plans 50 times since limited action against Syria was first considered
Black Democrats were some of the most consistent opponents of the war in Iraq
Worried about what effect inaction will have on Iran's nuclear ambitions
According to reporting from The Wall Street Journal
China and Russia say military action against Syria without U.N. approval would be illegal
There is bipartisan opposition to strike against the Assad regime
Because the proposed strikes will be limited