Judging the Alito Retirement Rumors
Is the conservative Supreme Court justice planning to retire this year?
Is the conservative Supreme Court justice planning to retire this year?
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon notes that Sen. Mark Kelly's comments about unlawful military orders were "unquestionably protected" by the First Amendment.
The EPA under the Obama and Biden administrations invoked that finding to adopt strict and costly regulations aiming to reduce emissions.
Plus: Is this the Supreme Court’s next big immigration case?
The commission has targeted the news rating company with onerous record demands and a merger condition aimed at cutting off its revenue.
Lower courts keep inventing loopholes to uphold discriminatory booze regulations.
Here's a quick reminder of what the Fourth Amendment has to say about that.
The 4th Circuit held that the doorstep of an apartment did not qualify as protected "curtilage" under the Fourth Amendment.
The prosecutor's threat renewed concerns about the Trump administration's commitment to protecting Second Amendment rights.
Plus: Why is the Supreme Court’s tariff decision taking so long?
A judicial appointment that began the Supreme Court's transformation.
Drug policy reformers and Second Amendment advocates team up in a case before the Supreme Court.
A recent Federalist Society Teleforum with Adam White and Ilan Wurman
NRA Amicus Brief Argues that Ban Fails Bruen Test
The Liberty Justice Center is urging the Supreme Court to uphold a 5th Circuit decision rejecting the claim that cannabis consumers have no Second Amendment rights.
It is nearly impossible to sue a rights-violating federal agent under current caselaw.
Another summary reversal of a Fourth Circuit AEDPA decision.
Trump’s legal arguments “would weaken, if not shatter, the independence of the Federal Reserve,” the justice said.
The antiquated statute arguably allows the president to deploy the military in response to nearly any form of domestic disorder.
The state requires carry permit holders to obtain advance permission before bringing firearms into businesses.
DHS tells officers to use "de-escalation tactics," employ "a verbal warning" instead of force when feasible, and avoid "placing themselves in positions" that trigger the use of deadly force.
A few thoughts on the oral argument in Galette v. N.J. Transit Corp.
Plus: Still waiting on the tariffs case.
State lawmakers should be more skeptical of overly broad laws, too.
They are joining the Trump administration in urging the Supreme Court to uphold a federal law that disarms "unlawful" drug consumers.
How J.D. Vance misstated the law.
The crucial question is whether the agent reasonably believed the driver he killed posed a threat, even if she was not actually trying to run him over.
Contrary to widespread speculation, the Court's first opinion of an argued case concerned neither Trump's tariffs nor voting rights.
The Supreme Court’s January docket is packed with big cases.
Adrian Gonzales is on trial for acts of "omission" that prosecutors say amounted to 29 felony counts of child endangerment.
The chief justice hails the judiciary as “a counter-majoritarian check on the political branches.”
The NYT profiles a sloppy and highly problematic empirical study of the Supreme Court.
The ruling, which emphasizes the lack of historical support for such a law, is unlikely to survive en banc review.
The president asserted broad powers to deport people, impose tariffs, and deploy the National Guard based on his own unilateral determinations.
Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice.
Despite their general ignorance of constitutional law, bears pose a much less grave threat to your civil liberties than humans do.
Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
Is unfettered majority rule actually a good idea for the left to embrace?
It is yet another ruling that shields the government from liability for damages caused by law enforcement.
The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure had a rocky 2025.
The department's lawsuit notes that the prohibited firearms are "in common use" for "lawful purposes," meaning they are covered by the Second Amendment.
The justices suggested the president is misinterpreting "the regular forces," a key phrase in the statute on which he is relying.
Oh, so now the Trump administration is worried about the complexity of its tariff polices?
A new study further undermines revisionist claims about birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, noting a dog that did not bark.
The appeals court ruled that administrators violated Stuart Reges' First Amendment rights when they investigated and threatened to punish him for constitutionally protected speech.
A conservative federal judge questions the reach of free speech.
This is Priscilla Villarreal’s second trip to the Supreme Court, which last year revived her First Amendment lawsuit.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.