SCOTUS Says States Have No Right to Money Taken Based on Overturned Convictions
If making people prove their innocence to get their property back violates due process, what about civil forfeiture?
If making people prove their innocence to get their property back violates due process, what about civil forfeiture?
Judge Janice Rogers Brown takes aim at Chevron deference.
A new film dramatizes the landmark Supreme Court decision on eminent domain.
For civil libertarians, the newest Supreme Court justice is better than the nominee who never got a hearing.
SCOTUS has delayed making a decision whether to tackle religious freedom claim.
How the new justice will impact the future of SCOTUS.
Neil Gorsuch confirmation vote expected Friday.
Comparing the two SCOTUS nominees.
The SCOTUS nominee called Brown v. Board of Education "one of the shining moments in constitutional history."
A lot of parliamentary shenanigans, but ultimately everything in the Senate is 'majority rules'
New York merchants are challenging a state law that dictates the way they describe prices.
A Supreme Court case shows how prosecutors get away with hiding evidence that could help defendants.
The Attorney General aims to dragoon state and local officials and leave them "no real option but to acquiesce."
Understanding the SCOTUS nominee's answers to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Today's religious freedom controversies got their start in the 19th century debate over outlawing polygamy.
The president dismisses his SCOTUS nominee's objections.
Does conviction for a crime mean a permanent ban?
Matt Welch and Thomas Massie among those on tonight's Kennedy
The SCOTUS nominee talks unenumerated rights.
He should explain his views on federalism, executive power, and unenumerated rights.
He should explain his views on federalism, executive power, and unenumerated rights.
What's happening on day two of Neil Gorsuch's SCOTUS confirmation hearings.
Today the Senate Judiciary Committee begins confirmation hearings on the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Monday in Murr v. Wisconsin, which tests the rules for when governments must pay compensation for regulatory takings.
What the Senate Judiciary Committee should ask the Supreme Court candidate.
GMU law scholar David Bernstein on how liberal and conservative judges can find common ground by embracing the right to pursue work.
Bassist Simon Tam talks about his band's Supreme Court fight to trademark its controversial name.
SCOTUS unanimously upheld the ministerial exception five years ago. It's already being challenged again.
Courts assume a "frightening and high risk of recidivism," based on an unsupported claim in Psychology Today.
Can U.S. courts compel non-citizens to pay restitution to other non-citizens for crimes that took place abroad? Apparently so.
Removal of Obama Administration's orders erases question about whether the courts should defer.
Justice Thomas says SCOTUS should review the constitutionality of asset forfeiture in a future case.
Revisiting a landmark First Amendment case.
After change in administration guidance, several drop legal challenges.
A dispute over 2.5 acres of land in the Wisconsin woods has morphed into a major property rights case. Several other states are watching it closely.
The Supreme Court is set to rule on the case.
"This has become a crucially important channel of political communication," Justice Elena Kagan observes.
Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson urges judicial minimalism in Second Amendment case.
Michigan lawmakers and the Twenty-First Amendment stink.
Trump to withdraw Obama administration's guidance, but that doesn't actually stop case moving forward.
The Trump administration has two openings to fill on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.
Sorting through Neil Gorsuch, the travel ban cases and more, with Reason's resident court watcher
Trump's SCOTUS nominee is a natural law thinker. That's a good thing.
Trump SCOTUS nominee rejects Trump's attack on the courts.