Neil Gorsuch, Civil Asset Forfeiture, and the Original Meaning of the 14th Amendment
Where does Justice Gorsuch stand on the Privileges or Immunities Clause?
Where does Justice Gorsuch stand on the Privileges or Immunities Clause?
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer elicited a shocking response during Wednesday's oral argument in a big civil asset forfeiture case.
The Supreme Court should make it clear that state forfeitures are constrained by the Excessive Fines Clause.
The "trial of the century" may not happen after all.
The two jurists dissent from denial of certiorari in Stuart v. Alabama.
Cases in which a majority of the Court fell down on the job.
Why both the dissent and majority in Janus were wrong, and what the next lawsuits may look like.
The Supreme Court's call for supplemental briefing in Frank v. Gaos will lead it to a difficult question.
The Iowa Republican is dialing up the anti-gay rhetoric.
The Supreme Court issues its first OT2018 decision in an argued case.
As more reforms take hold, expect more challenges-especially if states end up detaining more people.
Clint Bolick faces a judicial retention fight.
Striking down exclusive representation would allow labor organizers to give the boot to free-riding employees.
Justices are being asked yet again to argue about wedding cakes and whether the Civil Rights Act covers discrimination against gay and transgender people.
The 5th Circuit judge weighs in on qualified immunity, criminal sentencing, and false imprisonment.
Jim Lindgren proposes a constitutional amendment banning court-packing. I'm all for it. But it can only pass if liberal Democrats get some reciprocal concession to support it.
The Court could strike a major blow for civil asset forfeiture reforms in the states and finally do away with an awful double jeopardy loophole.
The 1944 ruling validated FDR's order to relocate and imprison 120,000 Japanese Americans and Japanese immigrants during World War II.
Progressives appreciate the separation of powers-up to a point.
His true impact may be less about transforming the Court's ideology, and more about altering its status in political life.
SCOTUS weighs congressional power, criminal law, and the non-delegation doctrine in Gundy v. U.S.
The socialist candidate fails to grapple with why we have the Electoral College in the first place.
On the market for political combat and the lack of interest in the Afghanistan War
I have a contribution in it, along with a variety of prominent legal scholars and commentators.
Kavanaugh will replace Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Sen. Susan Collins called the Swetnick story "outlandish." It might have given her cover to confirm the judge.
Judge Kavanaugh appears to have enough votes to be confirmed.
While the Supreme Court nominee's anger and frustration last week were understandable, his tactics were troubling.
The final vote is likely to take place this weekend.
Plus: millennial men are more socialist than millennial women and changes to juvenile justice programs
But they might be worth trying anyway.
"This is such an absurd contortion of Title IX that I suspect even those filing the complaint know it's unlikely to succeed as a matter of law."
Plus: more transparency among California cops and less transparency among Instagram "influencers."
Michael Avenatti's client contradicted her previous claims, can't say the judge was actually involved.
Opposition to Kavanaugh stems from a case that was decided the year Kavanaugh was born and was argued by professors from the law school from which he graduated.
Lying about the Devil's Triangle may or may not be disqualifying for the Supreme Court, but this whole process is a reminder that the federal government's power makes politics too important.
"We oppose him in light of the credible allegations of sexual assault against him."
A libertarian-leaning federal judge and a liberal Supreme Court justice both make the case against qualified immunity.
Plus: The Justice Department goes after "net neutrality" in California and SNL takes on Brett Kavanaugh.
One of the points at issue in the debate over the sexual assault accusations against Brett Kavanaugh is whether the standards of proof used by the Senate should be those appropriate to a criminal trial or those of a job interview. The latter is the superior approach.
Temperamental centrism and case-by-case decision-making, on Brett Kavanaugh and other issues, irritates nearly everyone-and is necessary.
The symposium includes contributions by various legal commentators, including Bruce Ackerman, Mari Matsuda, Deborah Rhode, and myself.
If you want to show your support for the accused or the accuser, stay away from these.
Sen. Lindsey Graham had the quote of the day: "I think I know what happened."
An index of recurring topics
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks