To Save His Travel Ban at SCOTUS, Trump Is Citing This 1972 Precedent
Understanding the Supreme Court decision at the heart of the travel ban case.
Understanding the Supreme Court decision at the heart of the travel ban case.
SCOTUS agrees to hear travel ban cases, will schedule oral arguments for October.
"I find it extremely improbable that the Framers understood the Second Amendment to protect little more than carrying a gun from the bedroom to the kitchen."
Can states force religious bakers to provide services to same-sex couples?
Chief Justice Roberts: "Today's decision knocks the definition of 'private property' loose from its foundation."
The Court unanimously rejects the government's position that any misstatement by an applicant can justify denaturalization years later.
Also, she thinks the Kent State shootings are an argument for censorship.
Asset forfeiture "has led to egregious and well-chronicled abuses."
The Supreme Court to decide if gerrymandering is unconstitutional
Starting with Roe v. Wade, the bestselling author argues in Commentary, the high court has removed too many topics from legislative debate.
The justices say the law's "unprecedented" and "staggering" scope violates the First Amendment.
"Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend."
Five terrible, perpetually recurring arguments, debunked.
One hundred years ago today, the U.S. government declared war on the First Amendment.
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees asks SCOTUS to end mandatory public-sector union fees.
Intent on blocking visitors from Muslim-majority countries, the president confuses political incorrectness with seriousness.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Carpenter v. U.S. next term.
The decision highlights the importance of drawing distinctions among "sex crimes."
SCOTUS rejects "provocation doctrine," says illegal police search must be viewed separately from subsequent police use of force.
Should we interpret the Constitution as a living document?
Libertarians and conservatives agree on Trump's judicial picks so far. But how long will the harmony last?
The president's list includes executive power enthusiasts and a free-market advocate.
How many Fourth Amendment protections do we forfeit when we use a cell phone?
The Supreme Court is asked to give the third-party doctrine a second look.
"The tattoo itself, the process of tattooing, and the business of tattooing are forms of pure expression fully protected by the First Amendment."
A Yale professor illustrates the tendency to frame what should be critiques of government power as complaints about particular politicians.
The federal government says yes, but the Supreme Court seems skeptical.
The order's "facially unconstitutional directives and its coercive effects weigh heavily against leaving it in place."
SCOTUS may soon decide whether or not to hear arguments in Peruta v. California.
Supreme Court turns away transparency lawsuit trying to force release of Senate report.
Justice Sotomayor dissents from denial of certiorari in Salazar-Limon v. City of Houston.
If making people prove their innocence to get their property back violates due process, what about civil forfeiture?
Judge Janice Rogers Brown takes aim at Chevron deference.
A new film dramatizes the landmark Supreme Court decision on eminent domain.
For civil libertarians, the newest Supreme Court justice is better than the nominee who never got a hearing.
SCOTUS has delayed making a decision whether to tackle religious freedom claim.
How the new justice will impact the future of SCOTUS.
Neil Gorsuch confirmation vote expected Friday.
Comparing the two SCOTUS nominees.
The SCOTUS nominee called Brown v. Board of Education "one of the shining moments in constitutional history."
A lot of parliamentary shenanigans, but ultimately everything in the Senate is 'majority rules'
New York merchants are challenging a state law that dictates the way they describe prices.
A Supreme Court case shows how prosecutors get away with hiding evidence that could help defendants.
The Attorney General aims to dragoon state and local officials and leave them "no real option but to acquiesce."