In Warrantless Cellphone Search Case, It's the Trump Administration vs. the 4th Amendment
The Supreme Court will arguments in Carpenter v. U.S. in the coming term.
The Supreme Court will arguments in Carpenter v. U.S. in the coming term.
Federalism is alive and kicking in the age of Trump.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association this fall.
The third-party doctrine is at odds with the Fourth Amendment.
Brief argues custom-made cakes, flowers are expressive acts protected by First Amendment.
Company asks the Supreme Court to hear its case for being allowed to put 3D printing plans for guns on its website.
That is not the law, and it shouldn't be.
Libertarian legal ideas are gaining ground.
Is gun control a political thicket that unelected judges should not enter?
"The Second Amendment erects some absolute barriers that no gun law may breach."
Asset forfeiture has "led to egregious and well-chronicled abuses," Thomas writes.
The possible replacements include Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett.
Despite framing to the contrary by some.
Irrational, half-baked anti-terrorist policies are not necessarily unconstitutional.
Understanding the Supreme Court decision at the heart of the travel ban case.
SCOTUS agrees to hear travel ban cases, will schedule oral arguments for October.
"I find it extremely improbable that the Framers understood the Second Amendment to protect little more than carrying a gun from the bedroom to the kitchen."
Can states force religious bakers to provide services to same-sex couples?
Chief Justice Roberts: "Today's decision knocks the definition of 'private property' loose from its foundation."
The Court unanimously rejects the government's position that any misstatement by an applicant can justify denaturalization years later.
Also, she thinks the Kent State shootings are an argument for censorship.
Asset forfeiture "has led to egregious and well-chronicled abuses."
The Supreme Court to decide if gerrymandering is unconstitutional
Starting with Roe v. Wade, the bestselling author argues in Commentary, the high court has removed too many topics from legislative debate.
The justices say the law's "unprecedented" and "staggering" scope violates the First Amendment.
"Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend."
Five terrible, perpetually recurring arguments, debunked.
One hundred years ago today, the U.S. government declared war on the First Amendment.
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees asks SCOTUS to end mandatory public-sector union fees.
Intent on blocking visitors from Muslim-majority countries, the president confuses political incorrectness with seriousness.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Carpenter v. U.S. next term.
The decision highlights the importance of drawing distinctions among "sex crimes."
SCOTUS rejects "provocation doctrine," says illegal police search must be viewed separately from subsequent police use of force.
Should we interpret the Constitution as a living document?
Libertarians and conservatives agree on Trump's judicial picks so far. But how long will the harmony last?
The president's list includes executive power enthusiasts and a free-market advocate.
How many Fourth Amendment protections do we forfeit when we use a cell phone?
The Supreme Court is asked to give the third-party doctrine a second look.
"The tattoo itself, the process of tattooing, and the business of tattooing are forms of pure expression fully protected by the First Amendment."
A Yale professor illustrates the tendency to frame what should be critiques of government power as complaints about particular politicians.
The federal government says yes, but the Supreme Court seems skeptical.
The order's "facially unconstitutional directives and its coercive effects weigh heavily against leaving it in place."
SCOTUS may soon decide whether or not to hear arguments in Peruta v. California.
Supreme Court turns away transparency lawsuit trying to force release of Senate report.
Justice Sotomayor dissents from denial of certiorari in Salazar-Limon v. City of Houston.