The Onerous Burdens of Sex Offender Registration Are Not Punishment, the 10th Circuit Rules. They Just Feel That Way.
According to the appeals court, the relevant question is what legislators were trying to accomplish.
According to the appeals court, the relevant question is what legislators were trying to accomplish.
Two sets of states, the House of Representatives and Solicitor General all get argument time.
When it comes to the Supreme Court, the answer is clearly "no." Things are less clear when it comes to the lower federal courts.
The Democratic presidential candidate favors the same magazine limit that a federal appeals court just declared unconstitutional.
A preliminary assessment of Trump v. Mazars and Trump v. Vance.
What sort of judicial nominee can we expect from the Democratic candidate?
Just like millions of their fellow Americans, the justices would have to adjust to the strange new realities of social distancing and working from home.
Its approval rating - 58 percent - is at its highest level since 2009, far outstripping the other two branches of government. That doesn't prove the justices are doing a good job, but will make it harder to pursue court-packing or other attacks on the Court.
Yet again, the Chief Justice shows his distaste for preliminary injunctions.
The episode reflects poorly on Biden.
The former New York Times SCOTUS reporter does not seem to understand the arguments she is criticizing.
The Chief Justice's votes against injunctive relief for churches, voters, and those on death row are of a piece.
A bust of the Dred Scott author stands in the old Supreme Court chambers in the capitol.
SCOTUS is the least democratic branch. Is that a bad thing?
A surprisingly agreeable chat on originalism, the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts and other things.
The state has barred hundreds of thousands of residents with felony records from voting without first paying off their court fines and fees.
Two centuries of precedents say the president is not immune from judicial process.
A quick scramble to end a man’s life, despite objections by attorneys and even the relatives of his victims
None of these theories fully account for the Chief Justice's decisions, though the strategic maximizer view may come closest.
The chief justice has managed to infuriate every major political faction.
Plus: Majority think people should be able to sue police officers, and more...
The Supreme Court weighs the legality of subpoenaing Trump’s financial records.
The Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump's claims of immunity, but reaffirmed limits on investigatory powers, and ruled in favor of Native American tribal claims against Oklahoma.
Plus: Biden echoes Trump on trade, tech ties to cops revealed, and more...
On the penultimate day of the October 2019 term, the Supreme Court expands the ministerial exception and upholds exemptions to the contraception coverage mandate.
SCOTUS rules 7-2 in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru.
The judicially invented license for police abuse undermines the rule of law and the separation of powers.
In the New York Times I explain that the Chief Justice Roberts we've seen this term is the same one we've seen before.
In a decision considering federal limitations on robocalls, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its longstanding approach to severability.
The answer speaks volumes about the extent to which that doctrine protects police officers from liability for outrageous conduct.
Good news for free association at college!
COVID-19 control measures violate the First Amendment when they arbitrarily favor secular conduct.
SCOTUS rules 5-4 in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.
Can the government compel speech? For Supreme Court justices, that seems to depend on the content of that speech.
Plus: More states pause reopening, Oregon measure to legalize psilocybin moves forward, and more...
And no, it wasn't the shoplifter's home.
SCOTUS rules 5–4 in Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The federal government hasn’t executed a prisoner since 2003. We may see three killed in July.
Roberts dissented in 2016 when SCOTUS struck down an abortion law. What changed this time around?
The Chief Justice provides the pivotal vote in the June Medical Services abortion case and Seila Law v. CFPB.
Professor Christopher Walker explores a potential wrinkle in the DACA decision.
Professor Zach Price on the Chief Justice Roberts' Decision in Dept. of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
These reforms would protect all Americans while reducing racial disparities in policing.
Police officers shouldn't be above the law.
Plus: Seattle labor coalition gives cops the boot, supermarkets are a miracle of modern markets, Klobuchar is the last person to realize she won't be Biden's VP, and more...
Defying expectations, Roberts joined with the four liberals on the court to rule against the Trump administration's elimination of the program.
In what appears to be a quite narrow ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts holds that if Trump wants to get rid of DACA, he'll have to try again.
Trump is caught in a trap of his own making.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks