Another Military Strike on a Speedboat Confirms Trump's Policy of Murdering Suspected Drug Smugglers
The president's new approach to drug law enforcement represents a stark departure from military norms and criminal justice principles.
The president's new approach to drug law enforcement represents a stark departure from military norms and criminal justice principles.
Equating drug trafficking with armed aggression, the president asserts the authority to kill anyone he perceives as a threat to "our most vital national interests."
That logic implausibly assumes presidents have the power to curtail substance abuse by attacking the drug supply.
Even when they are less patently ridiculous, the metrics of success favored by government officials make little sense.
After promising to stop the flow of drugs during his first term, the president blames foreign officials for his failure.
The president can cite meaningless "adequate steps," ambiguous drug seizure numbers, and a decline in drug deaths that began before he took office.
Since the president-elect refuses to admit that levies on imports are taxes paid by Americans, he sees no downside to raising them.
Both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris support supply-side tactics that are worse than ineffective.
Since he favors aggressive drug law enforcement, severe penalties, and impunity for abusive police officers, he may have trouble persuading black voters that he is on their side.
The Republican presidential candidate ignores the lethal impact of the drug policies he avidly supports.
Mexico's election results are the latest sign of Latin American dissent from the drug war.
Texas sociologist Howard Campbell on drug war failures at the Juarez/El Paso border