Do Cellphones Cause Cancer? RFK Jr.'s HHS Is Suppressing FDA Data Confirming Cellphone Safety.
The Department of Health and Human Services is launching a study apparently trying to find otherwise.
The Department of Health and Human Services is launching a study apparently trying to find otherwise.
Vaccinated adults had a 74 percent lower risk of dying from COVID-19—and a 25 percent lower risk of dying, period.
A perfect example of waste, fraud, and abuse.
The focus on the health risks of alcohol consumption gives short shrift to the reasons people like to drink.
The evidence is vast but open to interpretation because observational studies are inherently ambiguous.
Stealth alcohol prohibition in the guise of an anti-cancer campaign.
So let's all enjoy a moderate toast to a Happy New Year!
A recent American Cancer Society study reports a negligible risk from passive smoking, shedding new light on the uproar over a 2003 paper.
In the name of safety, politicians did many things that diminished our lives—without making us safer.
"Following the science" as the Supreme Court considers the safety and efficacy of medical abortions.
Evidence actually shows that vaccinated people are less likely to be hospitalized or die of the infection.
Plus: The editors ponder the lack of women’s pants pockets in the marketplace.
The estimate implies an overall infection fatality rate of about 0.5 percent, although that number should be viewed with caution.
The Stanford professor and Great Barrington Declaration coauthor stands up to COVID-19 autocrats and disastrous lockdowns by following the science.
Case trends in states with mandates were very similar to case trends in states without them.
Supporters of that policy assume it works, then desperately search for evidence to validate that conviction.
The country, which has a much lower fatality rate than the U.S., eschewed lockdowns in favor of information.
Nationwide, newly reported infections have been falling since January 14.
Unvaccinated Americans over age 50 are 44 times more likely to be hospitalized than triple-vaccinated folks.
Some epidemiologists estimate that the actual number of new infections peaked last week.
Omicron patients were much less likely to have severe symptoms.
Based on the experience in South Africa, the Biden administration's top medical adviser says "this thing will peak after a period of a few weeks and turn around."
Focusing on infections rather than severe disease is more misleading than ever.
Because the agency ties mask recommendations to virus transmission rather than serious cases, its guidance is unlikely to change anytime soon.
The failure of legal challenges obscures an ongoing scientific debate.
New research shows incidental and mild infections account for a large and rising share of that widely cited number.
The government "strongly recommends" masking at private outdoor gatherings as well.
A rational debate requires acknowledging both the strengths and the weaknesses of the scientific evidence.
The evidence that the benefits outweigh the costs is not nearly as impressive as mandate enthusiasts imply.
They'll never be satisfied in a world of balanced risks.
The results also indicate that vaccinated people infected by delta have lower viral loads and less severe symptoms than unvaccinated people.
That conclusion is not justified by the CDC's Provincetown data, and it is inconsistent with a new study from Singapore.
Federal officials invited alarmist press coverage of breakthrough infections.
The administration is dismayed by the alarmist news coverage it invited.
Researchers are still trying to determine what role vaccinated carriers may have played in the Massachusetts cases identified by the CDC.
We don't know if COVID-19 escaped from a lab or not. The Chinese government apparently wants to keep it that way.
An argument for humility in the face of pandemic forecasting unknown unknowns
Daily U.S. COVID-19 deaths are approaching the influenza average.
A co-author of the article that Rochelle Walensky cited says outdoor settings probably account for "substantially less than 1 percent" of infections.
Critics said Gov. Greg Abbott's decision was "extraordinarily dangerous" and reflected "Neanderthal thinking."
The paper gives short shrift to evidence that vaccines nearly eliminate the risk of infection.
The agency continues a pattern of arbitrary, dubious, and ever-changing recommendations.
The CDC's recommendations have never been purely a matter of science.
Suspicions about a lab leak will continue so long as Chinese officials keep acting like they have something to hide.
Rochelle Walensky's gloss is puzzling in light of the evidence presented in the systematic review on which she relied.
The emphasis on a goal that may be impossible to reach reduces the incentive to get vaccinated.
The researchers highlight the danger posed by tiny, well-circulated respiratory droplets.
Cases are rising mainly in states with stricter disease control policies.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.