How Trump's Proposed 35 Percent Tariff on Canada Could Harm Domestic Manufacturing
Increasing the cost of inputs and imported energy would make American exports less competitive.
Increasing the cost of inputs and imported energy would make American exports less competitive.
This ruling was widely expected in the wake of the Supreme Court's decison barring nationwide injunctions.
It's an obvious abuse of emergency powers, a claim to unconstitutional delegation of legislative power, and a threat to the economy and the rule of law.
A DHS video lionizing Customs and Border Protection quotes the Bible and includes a song promising that "God's gonna cut you down."
The Constitution requires the president to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
Katherine Yon Ebright and Leah Tulin of the Brennan Center make the case against judicial deference to Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.
The Cato Institute and the New Civil Liberties Alliance urge the Federal Circuit to extend the logic of a decision against the president's far-reaching import taxes.
Plus: TSA time wasters, in defense of tourist traps, Trump announces new tariffs, and more...
The government’s lawyers also say that supposedly nonexistent policy is perfectly consistent with the First Amendment.
Our brief explains why the Federal Circuit should uphold the Court of International Trade decision striking down Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs.
The president is torn between the economic concerns of his supporters and the demands of immigration hardliners.
Why Edward Snowden deserves not only a presidential pardon, but a hero's welcome home.
When Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick is worried about our constitutional order, we should all pay heed.
In 2018, Trump hailed a trade deal with South Korea as "fair and reciprocal" and said it was "a historic milestone in trade." So much for that.
Yet another wasteful expense in the "big, beautiful bill."
The taxes on sound suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns, originally enacted in 1934, were meant to be prohibitive, imposing bans in the guise of raising revenue.
The ban is a bad law. But leaving it on the books and willfully ignoring it sets a potentially more dangerous precedent.
Several of the items on the Declaration's list of grievances against King George III also apply to Donald Trump today.
Class actions and Administrative Procedure Act claims can achieve much the same result as the nationwide orders that the Supreme Court rejected.
Americans will continue to pay higher tariffs, while Vietnamese businesses won't pay anything. Whatever happened to reciprocity?
Our dreams have fallen from supersonic world travel to jailing migrants who've hurt no one.
Plus: Trade deal with Vietnam, Romanian right-wing presidential candidate sent to trial, and more...
But, notably, the court chose not to rule on the issue of what qualifies as an "invasion."
The organization was unfair to female competitors, was unfair to Lia Thomas, and handed the Trump administration a win on a silver platter.
The company's surrender to Trump's extortion vindicates his strategy of using frivolous litigation and his presidential powers to punish constitutionally protected speech.
The Justice Department cannot constitutionally prosecute a news outlet for covering the news.
Only eight days after construction began, Florida’s new immigration detention center in the Everglades is set to officially open this week.
Tellingly, the president avoided defending his dubious interpretation of the 14th Amendment at the Supreme Court.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit is considering whether the president properly invoked the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged gang members.
The president's cruel and pointless ban on immigration or visits from nationals of 12 countries will have no significant safety benefit for Americans.
Plus: What the socialists don't understand about childcare, the current state of Iran's nuclear capabilities, and more...
Jim Ryan is the latest casualty in Trump's unconstitutional war against elite universities.
Plus: Conservatives won big overall this year at the Supreme Court.
Plus: The anti-socialist moment, muscle-building drugs counteract Ozempic, arsony gunman in Idaho, and more...
Democratic critics of the new program overlook the injustice of permanently disarming Americans who pose no threat to public safety.
“Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch,” declared Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
Today's Supreme Court ruling barring nationwide injunctions could empower the federal government to engage in large-scale violations of the Constitution. Exactly how bad the consequences will be depends on the extent to which other remedies can be used to forestall them.
The trade deficit is getting bigger, the deals aren't coming, and foreign investment has declined.
This pivot to privately funded research could reduce the burden on taxpayers and lead to more scientific breakthroughs.
Any decisions made by U.S. Steel's executives and shareholders will require approval from Trump, his appointees, or his successors.
It explains how these much-maligned doctrines can be valuable tools for constraining power grabs by presidents of both parties.
The liberal justice faults the majority for leaving deportees to “suffer violence in far-flung locales.”
Those who pushed for Trump to attack Iran are now moving the goalposts for success.
They are prominent legal scholars and Supreme Court litigators from opposite sides of the political spectrum.
Marco Rubio’s nebulous invocation of foreign policy interests is bound to have a chilling impact on freedom of speech, which is the whole point.
The ruling includes no analysis. Justice Sotomayor's dissent has a compelling explanation of why it is wrong.
Medical school is so expensive in the first place because of a policy that gives medical students unlimited access to loans.
War with Iran was a risky, destructive gamble. But the worst outcome has been avoided, for now.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks