The State Department's Naughty List
The identification of terrorism sponsors is driven by politics rather than facts.
The identification of terrorism sponsors is driven by politics rather than facts.
Here comes Watergate, 21st-century style-except this time around, innocent people died.
Apparently, the government isn't good at designing sustainable social networks.
Not happy with the growing trend of diplomatic assignments as political rewards
Case where authorities referred to the journalist as a potential "conspirator"
It certainly will be coming up a lot should she run for president
Assault of journalist Tetiana Chornovol cited
Half believe dual citizenship should be allowed
More House hearings tomorrow
Hicks believe at least two American lives would've been saved with a faster response to last year's attack
Lack of responsibility
Have been brought back to work
Had multiple outside jobs
Thinks blame was irresponsible
Move comes after messages between two senior Al Qaeda leaders were intercepted
Fears of possible terrorist attacks in Mideast and North Africa
Should've been horrified all that stuff was barely password protected
Says it is "nothing more than a despicable PR stunt"
Guess they never tried posting more gifs and memes
They denied knowledge of pending investigations
Leaked papers that showed manipulation or suppression of investigations of wrongdoing
Senator Chuck Grassley asking if Huma Abedin passed "political intelligence"
She revealed criminal activity among staffers
Memo says a U.S. ambassador solicited prostitutes
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks