Biden's Supreme Court Reforms Are Unnecessary and Wrong
The Supreme Court is not as “extreme” or divided as it may seem.
The Supreme Court is not as “extreme” or divided as it may seem.
His criticism of President Joe Biden’s proposed Supreme Court reform is hard to take seriously.
Nina Jankowicz finds out the truth may hurt, but it isn’t lawsuit bait.
Chelsea Koetter is asking the Michigan Supreme Court to render the state's debt collection scheme unconstitutional.
The ruling is the second recent court decision that has curbed Detroit's aggressive vehicle forfeiture program.
"In short, 'cruel and unusual' is not the same as 'harmful and unfair,'" the court wrote.
Sen. Rand Paul writes that the lawsuit punishes Apple for a feature its customers like.
The decision agreed with Trump that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed, which could have positive downstream effects for the rest of us, as well.
A federal appeals court ruled that the government is not immune from a breach-of-contract lawsuit filed by foreign students duped into enrolling into a fake school run by ICE.
The doctrine makes it nearly impossible for victims of prosecutorial misconduct to get recourse.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says these cases will "devastate" the regulatory state. Good.
Her concurrence is a reminder that the application of criminal law should not be infected by personal animus toward any given defendant.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the Supreme Court ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy "a power grab." She's right, but in the wrong way.
There is a great deal of panic surrounding the "extreme" nature of the current Court. But that is often not based in reality.
Paul Erlinger was sentenced to 15 years in prison based largely on a determination made by a judge—not a jury.
Chevron deference, a doctrine created by the Court in 1984, gives federal agencies wide latitude in interpreting the meaning of various laws. But the justices may overturn that.
The plaintiffs are challenging the state's widespread surveillance, which it collects through over 600 cameras.
The justice's benign comments set off a lengthy news cycle and have been treated as a scandal by some in the media. Why?
Corey Harris attracted widespread news coverage—including from Reason—when a video showed him behind the wheel during a court hearing about a suspended license. Except he never had a license at all.
Plus: A single-issue voter asks the editors for some voting advice in the 2024 presidential election.
Corey Harris' case should never have been a national news story to begin with.
Bans have resulted in what some have called the "whitewashing" of American juries.
Welcome to a system in which laws and regulations are weaponized by the powerful against opponents.
Plus: The L.P. candidate for president, flooding in Brazil, TikTok influencers going after rich husbands, and more...
The ACLU, another polarizing organization, was willing to defend the NRA in court. That should tell you that some things aren't partisan.
Justin Pulliam's arrest and lawsuit once again demand we ask if "real" journalists are entitled to a different set of rights.
The Sixth Amendment was originally seen as vital to preserving liberty. Yet it has been consistently watered down.
Judge Carlton Reeves ripped apart the legal doctrine in his latest decision on the matter.
Left alone, artificial intelligence could actually help small firms compete with tech giants.
Prosecutor Ralph Petty was also employed as a law clerk—by the same judges he argued before.
Dexter Taylor is now a "violent felon," even though his hobby was victimless.
Mollie and Michael Slaybaugh are reportedly out over $70,000. The government says it is immune.
Under the prosecution's theory, Trump would be guilty of falsifying business records even if Daniels made the whole thing up.
The three-judge panel concluded unanimously that while the state law at issue is constitutional, the wildlife agents' application of it was not.
New York prosecutors are relying on testimony from several people who do not seem trustworthy.
Christian McGhee is suing, arguing a North Carolina assistant principal infringed on his free speech rights.
The pledge, while mostly legally illiterate, offers a reminder of the former president's outlook on government accountability.
Vincent Yakaitis is unfortunately not the first such defendant. He will also not be the last.
David Knott helps clients retrieve unclaimed property from the government. The state has made it considerably harder for him to do that.
Plus: A listener asks the editors about the magical thinking behind the economic ideas of Modern Monetary Theory.
The ruling has nothing to do with #MeToo. It is about ensuring a fair trial—a principle that applies no matter how unsympathetic the defendant.
In the Jim Crow South, businesses fought racism—because the rules denied them customers.
The Supreme Court will decide whether former presidents can avoid criminal prosecution by avoiding impeachment and removal.
The little-known but outrageous practice allowed judges to enhance defendants' sentences using conduct a jury acquitted them of.
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
The local prosecuting attorney in Sunflower, Mississippi, is seeking to take away Nakala Murry's three children.
Michael Garrett and other Texas inmates get less than four hours of sleep a night. He argues it's cruel and unusual punishment.
Too many property owners are having trouble asserting their rights, but not everything is "squatter's rights."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10