'Designer Baby' Scaremongering Never Gets Old, Does It?
Swedish researcher denounced by bioconservatives for using CRISPR genome-editing on human embryos
Swedish researcher denounced by bioconservatives for using CRISPR genome-editing on human embryos
A review of Beyond Human: How Cutting-Edge Science Is Extending Our Lives
Also most babies will be created using skin cells and the bioethics of radical life extension
Short dramatic film from Institute for Justice lays out the case for paying the people who give marrow, organs, and more.
National Institutes of Health bioethicists agree with me and lift research moratorium
If you happen to be Moscow drop by tonight at the DI Telegraph Building on Tverskaya - can also watch live
Celebrating the 20th anniversary of the birth of the first cloned mammal
Nearly 2 years more of disability-free life expectancy
Fomenting another useless moral panic over biotechnology
Scientists are trying to achieve just this goal, but some ethicists are opposed to the research
Genomes are not "sacred" entities needing some kind of special moral consideration.
Three-parent babies are now possible. Congress should get out of the way.
Why should not men be eligible for uterine transplants?
Ordering people to reproduce in only government approved ways is tyrannical and unethical.
State mandated eugenics is always evil.
Researchers will use CRISPR gene-editing technique to explore how human embryos develop.
I'm a bioethicist, and I am here to help slow down scientific and medical progress
Yes. Next question.
Bioethicists are again trying to stand athwart progress, yelling stop
Let us decide for ourselves if genetic ignorance is bliss.
Bush not only concerned about fetuses, but brain-dead people too.
Is it immoral to slow progress toward curing diseases and creating more environmentally benign products?
Is life better than death; health better disease; wealth better than poverty? Opinions vary.
Is progress itself an ethical obligation? Opinions vary.
Bioethicists and scientists who say otherwise are wrong.
A contract is a contract, but a more generous spirit might relent
Permissionless innovation works best for both scientific and moral progress.
Now watch the bioluddites swarm out of the policy woodwork.
Better to be the donor than the recipient in this case
Naturally the usual bioluddites are eager to stop progress.
Recent advances in uterus transplantation will soon make this possible
Just because it's new doesn't mean that it's wrong.
Researchers develop a powerful new tool to manage wild ecosystems.
The moral case for designer babies
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10