Chief Justice Roberts, concurs citing South Bay. Justice Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justice Kagan.
But an impeached-but-not-removed President would still receive the benefits.
Does the Munsingwear doctrine apply to Twitter?
Over the past decade, Scholastica has completely overtaken ExpressO
If Trump’s speech is protected by the First Amendment, then incitement cannot be grounds for impeachment.
"An apparent compromise of the confidentiality of the CM/ECF system due to these discovered vulnerabilities currently is under investigation"
Logitech Brio 4K Camera with light ring
I am grateful I have not spent the last dreadful year on Twitter.
I gave a mini-monologue on Spectrum 1 News in Austin
If a majority of the cabinet agrees to remove the President, Pelosi and McConnell could run out the clock till January 20.
Other nominations: Lisa Monaco as Deputy Attorney General, Vanita Gupta as Associate Attorney General, and Kristen Clarke to head Civil Rights Division
The panel attempts to explain how to perform the Diocese comparator approach. Yet, the panel does not recognize that the Supreme Court's precedents do not provide an answer.
"Essential" simply means "important" to Governor Cuomo.
"But apparently to get a pardon, one has to be either a Republican, a convicted child murderer or a turkey."
In 1903, "President Roosevelt made over 160 recess appointments during the instantaneous inter-session interval."
The panel reviews Governor Cuomo's order with strict scrutiny, declares it unconstitutional.
A perfect summation of the longest month ever.
The Response is due January 22. The inauguration us January 20.
Can Circuit Courts set precedents in emergency litigation through granting injunctions or stays?
California's policy shows a lack of awareness about how Jewish people pray.
Will Santa Kagan deliver coal in South Bay's stockings?
New Orleans Supreme Court removes statue of first Louisianan on U.S. Supreme Court.
It takes weeks, not days, and certainly not hours, to review California's complete prohibition on indoor worship.
A connection between ACB's dissent and Trump's pardon?
"The Court is concerned the portraits may serve as unintended but implicit symbols that suggest the courtroom may be a place historically administered by whites for whites, and that thus others are of a lesser standing in the dispensing of justice."
District Court: California's complete prohibition on all indoor worship is permissible because the state permits worship outdoors.
Will Universities be willing to fund travel? Will professors even want to travel?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks