Justice Kavanaugh joined the Chief, once again.
Justice Gorsuch and Thomas cast doubt on the canonical case, and seek to restore the original understanding of the 14th Amendment.
Justice Alito thinks so. Ditto Justices Gorsuch and Thomas.
If the Biden Administration refuse to defend the constitutionality of the male-only selective service, Congress will not likely intervene.
Thirteen years after Heller, it's time for the Supreme Court to settle whether the Second Amendment applies outside the home.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia and Riddle v. Harmon
The case has been rescheduled and relisted many times.
Is there some strategic reason for the delay? Or still internecine conflicts over the selection?
Fee Simple, easements in gross, runs with the land, bundle of sticks
And the Chief name-dropped "President Obama"
"The Tax Mandate thus gives the States a choice: they can have either the badly needed federal funds or their sovereign authority to set state tax policy. But they cannot have both. In our current economic crisis, that is no choice at all. It is a metaphorical 'gun to the head.'"
"In the absence of such an assurance by March 23, we will take appropriate additional action to ensure that our States have the clarity and assurance necessary."
The bar will presumably try again to draft a constitutional version of the ABA Model Rule
And if the Senior Articles Editor cannot meet this quota, then "Select members of the Senior Board will then take steps to remedy the Senior Article Editor’s concerns"
This provision seems to prohibit states that accept billions of dollars in federal funds from reducing taxes prior to 2024.
Which side of 50 will the nominees be on?
Hosted by the UT Austin Federalist Society Chapter
On Tuesday, March 10, I told my students we probably wouldn't be back in class after spring break.
Contingent Remainders and Executory Interests
Chief Justice Roberts wrote one solo dissent in his first fifteen years on the bench. He has written three in the past four months.
Roberts v. Jaycees and Boy Scouts v. Dale
It isn't so clear that a Justice's first assigned opinion has been unanimous.
The En Banc Court Split 6-5 to vacate the prior grant of rehearing en banc. This case may present a cert-worthy Chevron vehicle.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks