Gorsuch Warns About Executive Overreach While Expanding Trump's Power
The Supreme Court extended presidential control over federal agencies. What could go wrong?
The Supreme Court extended presidential control over federal agencies. What could go wrong?
The conservative justice continues to wage a lonely legal crusade over the Commerce Clause.
Understanding the stakes in Kian v. Florida
How a four-decade-old dissent may now help the president fire independent federal agency heads at will
Plus: When tattoos meet copyright law
Plus: a few words about my new book
The two judicial conservatives continue to disappoint criminal justice reform advocates.
Lifetime tenure for federal judges has been the constitutional practice since ratification.
Should it take more than a 5–4 vote for the Supreme Court to strike down a federal law?
Plus: A "supremely cringe" viral tweet about the Supreme Court
From immigration and guns to executive power, transgender athletes, and mail-in ballots, these are the Supreme Court cases to watch out for in May and June.
The justice defends the Supreme Court as a model of respectful and principled adjudication.
Plus: The Supreme Court says “demands for a charity’s private member or donor information” raises First Amendment problems.
The government wants access to millions of cell phone location histories. The Supreme Court will decide what the Fourth Amendment allows.
Plus: Does Trump expect to lose the birthright citizenship case?
Plus: a credible new report on the Alito retirement rumors.
Remembering the infuriating case of United States v. “The Spirit of ’76.”
Plus: The Alito retirement rumors keep swirling.
How the digital privacy rights of millions are at stake in Chatrie v. United States.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara.
Understanding the stakes in Trump v. Barbara.
Plus: What George Orwell thought about Friedrich Hayek.
What’s at stake in Watson v. Republican National Committee.
The Republican stalwart thought he could wield more power from the Senate than he ever could from the Supreme Court.
Plus: Brian Doherty, RIP.
What happens if both political parties come to distrust the Court’s judgment?
The judiciary is largely absent from the long-running constitutional debate over undeclared foreign wars.
Plus: An unsettling comparison between the Iran War and “Lyndon Johnson going into Vietnam.”
The president has no lawful authority to launch a war absent a congressional declaration of war.
Federal officials enjoy too much immunity from being sued over their misconduct.
The conservative justice’s regrettable opinion in Learning Resources v. Trump.
Is the conservative Supreme Court justice planning to retire this year?
Plus: Is this the Supreme Court’s next big immigration case?
Here's a quick reminder of what the Fourth Amendment has to say about that.
Plus: Why is the Supreme Court’s tariff decision taking so long?
Why a conservative judge’s “patience is at an end” over Trump’s immigration crackdown.
It is nearly impossible to sue a rights-violating federal agent under current caselaw.
Trump’s legal arguments “would weaken, if not shatter, the independence of the Federal Reserve,” the justice said.
Plus: Still waiting on the tariffs case.
How J.D. Vance misstated the law.
The Supreme Court’s January docket is packed with big cases.
The chief justice hails the judiciary as “a counter-majoritarian check on the political branches.”
Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice.
Is unfettered majority rule actually a good idea for the left to embrace?
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.