11 Big SCOTUS Cases That Will Be Decided Soon
From immigration and guns to executive power, transgender athletes, and mail-in ballots, these are the Supreme Court cases to watch out for in May and June.
From immigration and guns to executive power, transgender athletes, and mail-in ballots, these are the Supreme Court cases to watch out for in May and June.
The justice defends the Supreme Court as a model of respectful and principled adjudication.
Plus: The Supreme Court says “demands for a charity’s private member or donor information” raises First Amendment problems.
The government wants access to millions of cell phone location histories. The Supreme Court will decide what the Fourth Amendment allows.
Plus: Does Trump expect to lose the birthright citizenship case?
Plus: a credible new report on the Alito retirement rumors.
Remembering the infuriating case of United States v. “The Spirit of ’76.”
Plus: The Alito retirement rumors keep swirling.
How the digital privacy rights of millions are at stake in Chatrie v. United States.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara.
Understanding the stakes in Trump v. Barbara.
Plus: What George Orwell thought about Friedrich Hayek.
What’s at stake in Watson v. Republican National Committee.
The Republican stalwart thought he could wield more power from the Senate than he ever could from the Supreme Court.
Plus: Brian Doherty, RIP.
What happens if both political parties come to distrust the Court’s judgment?
The judiciary is largely absent from the long-running constitutional debate over undeclared foreign wars.
Plus: An unsettling comparison between the Iran War and “Lyndon Johnson going into Vietnam.”
Federal officials enjoy too much immunity from being sued over their misconduct.
The conservative justice’s regrettable opinion in Learning Resources v. Trump.
Is the conservative Supreme Court justice planning to retire this year?
Plus: Is this the Supreme Court’s next big immigration case?
Here's a quick reminder of what the Fourth Amendment has to say about that.
Plus: Why is the Supreme Court’s tariff decision taking so long?
Why a conservative judge’s “patience is at an end” over Trump’s immigration crackdown.
It is nearly impossible to sue a rights-violating federal agent under current caselaw.
Trump’s legal arguments “would weaken, if not shatter, the independence of the Federal Reserve,” the justice said.
Plus: Still waiting on the tariffs case.
How J.D. Vance misstated the law.
The Supreme Court’s January docket is packed with big cases.
The chief justice hails the judiciary as “a counter-majoritarian check on the political branches.”
Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice.
Is unfettered majority rule actually a good idea for the left to embrace?
Remembering an important voice from the founding era.
A conservative federal judge questions the reach of free speech.
From birthright citizenship to tariffs, many of the president’s key policies run counter to the Constitution’s original meaning.
The Supreme Court should take a page from its own history.
Plus: It's the final day of Reason's webathon.
Plus: It’s webathon time.
The Supreme Court’s power to nullify legislative and executive acts is inherent in the Constitution.
Plus: Jimmy Cliff, RIP.
Plus: Ken Burns’ The American Revolution is worth your time.
Remembering the legacy of a principled legal activist.
The right to keep and bear arms occupies a curious place in American legal history.
For the justices, the question is just how much deference the president deserves.
The legal challengers to Trump's tariffs had a good day in court.
Learning Resources v. Trump will test both executive power and judicial fidelity.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks