A Grand Jury Rejects Trump's Attempt To Prosecute 6 Legislators for Saying Something He Did Not Like
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
Another judge has ordered the Department of Homeland Security to follow federal law, even as the Trump administration argues it has broad authority to conduct warrantless immigration arrests.
To make sense of the Justice Department’s latest documents, you have to understand what they actually are.
A judge blamed Trump for his decision to leave the bench, but it also terminated a misconduct inquiry.
Judge Sutton concludes there was not much to the complaint submitted by the Department of Justice.
Another summary reversal of a Fourth Circuit AEDPA decision.
The lawyer, who delivered the grudge-driven indictments that the president demanded, refused to relinquish her job after another judge ruled that her appointment was illegal.
The antiquated statute arguably allows the president to deploy the military in response to nearly any form of domestic disorder.
That embarrassing mistake highlights the slipperiness of Trump's attempts to justify legally dubious policies by invoking the specter of "foreign terrorist organizations."
The NYT profiles a sloppy and highly problematic empirical study of the Supreme Court.
The president asserted broad powers to deport people, impose tariffs, and deploy the National Guard based on his own unilateral determinations.
Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
The justices suggested the president is misinterpreting "the regular forces," a key phrase in the statute on which he is relying.
The defense secretary claims the video, which shows a second strike that killed two floundering survivors, would compromise "sources and methods."
Calling suspected cocaine smugglers "combatants" does not justify summarily executing them.
So far, by the president's reckoning, he has prevented 650,000 U.S. drug deaths—eight times the number recorded last year.
The footage shows what happened to the survivors of the September 2 attack that inaugurated the president's deadly campaign against suspected drug boats.
The commander who ordered a second missile strike worried that the helpless men he killed might be able to salvage cocaine from the smoldering wreck.
Adm. Frank M. Murphy reportedly told lawmakers a controversial second strike was necessary because drugs on the burning vessel remained a threat.
Regardless of what the defense secretary knew or said about the September 2 boat attack, the forces he commands are routinely committing murder in the guise of self-defense.
The 3rd Circuit’s ruling against Alina Habba highlights a disturbing pattern of legal evasion.
Instead of asking whether a particular boat attack went too far, Congress should ask how the summary execution of criminal suspects became the new normal.
FTC staff support the proposal by the Texas Supreme Court to allow for alternative means of accreditation.
Even if you accept the president's assertion of an "armed conflict" with drug smugglers, blowing apart survivors of a boat strike would be a war crime.
A rare instance in which courts were willing to impose sanctions upon sanctionable conduct.
The president’s reaction to a supposedly "seditious" video illustrates his tendency to portray criticism of him as a crime.
The president's authoritarian response to a video posted by six members of Congress, who he says "should be arrested and put on trial," validates their concerns.
The decision is consistent with the president's avowed concerns about "overcriminalization in federal regulations."
Trade deficits are not a "national emergency," and the president's import taxes won’t reduce them.
The government is tying itself in knots to cast murder as self-defense and avoid legal limits on the president's use of the military.
There are several problems with the president's math, which suggests he has accomplished an impossible feat.
The Manhattan district attorney converted a hush payment into 34 felonies via a chain of legal reasoning with several conspicuously weak links.
The potential for deadly error underlines the lawlessness of the president’s bloodthirsty anti-drug strategy.
Until now, the president concedes, interdiction has been "totally ineffective." Blowing up drug boats won't change that reality.
An interesting Reuters report on the new locus of lawsuits challenging the Trump Administration.
Thoughts on the New York Times' Selective Survey of District Court Judges
If the courts try to enforce legal limits on the president's military deployments, he can resort to an alarmingly broad statute that gives him more discretion.
U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut concluded that the president's description of "War ravaged Portland" was "simply untethered to the facts."
The latest ruling reminds us that terrorism statutes are mostly redundant.
The appeals court blocked the removal of alleged Venezuelan gang members under that law "because we find no invasion or predatory incursion."
A federal district court judge granted environmentalist groups’ request for a preliminary injunction.
A New York Times column on the Supreme Court offers a misleading picture and errant analysis.
The judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit split over whether they should write about the reasons for their splitting over en banc review.
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against any additional construction at the immigration detention center amid plans to increase the facility’s capacity to 4,000 detainees.
Judge Katsas and Judge Rao disagreed on the reasons, but both agreed that Judge Boasberg overstepped; Judge Pillard dissented.
Rushing out opinions can lock in erroneous conclusions and create problematic precedent.
The Supreme Court's critics are too quick to assume the Court's orders are motivated by political considerations as opposed to principle.
Trump v. CASA was important, but it is not clear district courts have gotten the message.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks