Video of my Bruno Leoni Institute (Milan) Talk on the Supreme Court Tariff Decision and its Implications
I gave the talk earlier this week.
I gave the talk earlier this week.
That defense applies only when an officer "reasonably" believed he was acting within his federal authority.
The brief, which asks a federal judge to reconsider an injunction blocking the project, reads like it was transcribed from the president's Truth Social account.
Even Republican critics of the Federal Reserve chairman's performance rejected the notion that he had broken the law by lying about the renovation of the central bank's headquarters.
A retired liberal justice does not credit the shadow docket hysteria, nor does former Judge Michael McConnell
The bureau reportedly investigated the author of a New York Times story that made FBI Director Kash Patel look bad.
William Baude and Richard Re respond to a common narrative
Those who don't like how the Supreme Court handles requests for interim relief might like solutions to the problem even less.
The Court of International Trade is weighing the legality of the import taxes that the president wants to impose under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The newlywed couple thought they were doing “everything the right way” by reporting to the base to start their lives together.
"No statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon concluded when he enjoined the project.
The agency refused to prosecute alleged national security, labor, and white-collar crime while increasing immigration cases, a new report finds.
There was little rhyme or reason to the president's "emergency" tariffs, which fluctuated wildly depending on his mood.
The president's predictions of the nation's imminent demise reflect his narcissistic authoritarianism.
The president and his new DHS secretary are enraged by jurists and legislators who refuse to toe the party line.
The president says federal courts should not make decisions based on partisan considerations unless it benefits him.
The president’s invocation of Section 122 conflates a trade deficit with a balance-of-payments deficit.
The president's wildly inaccurate ideological labels are no more meaningful than his other ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with him.
A discussion of the [shadow/interim/emergency/other] docket with Professor Kate Shaw.
Although Trump has other options for taxing imports, the justices reminded him that he needs clear congressional authorization.
The president is relying on a provision that the government's lawyers said had no "obvious application" to his goal of reducing the trade deficit.
The president neither understands nor appreciates the vital role of judicial independence in upholding the rule of law.
There are many laws that explicitly authorize the president to impose taxes on imports, but they include limits that Trump was keen to avoid.
A grand jury and a federal judge rejected the president’s vendetta against legislators who produced a video about the duty to refuse unlawful military orders.
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
Another judge has ordered the Department of Homeland Security to follow federal law, even as the Trump administration argues it has broad authority to conduct warrantless immigration arrests.
To make sense of the Justice Department’s latest documents, you have to understand what they actually are.
A judge blamed Trump for his decision to leave the bench, but it also terminated a misconduct inquiry.
Judge Sutton concludes there was not much to the complaint submitted by the Department of Justice.
Another summary reversal of a Fourth Circuit AEDPA decision.
The lawyer, who delivered the grudge-driven indictments that the president demanded, refused to relinquish her job after another judge ruled that her appointment was illegal.
The antiquated statute arguably allows the president to deploy the military in response to nearly any form of domestic disorder.
That embarrassing mistake highlights the slipperiness of Trump's attempts to justify legally dubious policies by invoking the specter of "foreign terrorist organizations."
The NYT profiles a sloppy and highly problematic empirical study of the Supreme Court.
The president asserted broad powers to deport people, impose tariffs, and deploy the National Guard based on his own unilateral determinations.
Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
The justices suggested the president is misinterpreting "the regular forces," a key phrase in the statute on which he is relying.
The defense secretary claims the video, which shows a second strike that killed two floundering survivors, would compromise "sources and methods."
Calling suspected cocaine smugglers "combatants" does not justify summarily executing them.
So far, by the president's reckoning, he has prevented 650,000 U.S. drug deaths—eight times the number recorded last year.
The footage shows what happened to the survivors of the September 2 attack that inaugurated the president's deadly campaign against suspected drug boats.
The commander who ordered a second missile strike worried that the helpless men he killed might be able to salvage cocaine from the smoldering wreck.
Adm. Frank M. Murphy reportedly told lawmakers a controversial second strike was necessary because drugs on the burning vessel remained a threat.
Regardless of what the defense secretary knew or said about the September 2 boat attack, the forces he commands are routinely committing murder in the guise of self-defense.
The 3rd Circuit’s ruling against Alina Habba highlights a disturbing pattern of legal evasion.
Instead of asking whether a particular boat attack went too far, Congress should ask how the summary execution of criminal suspects became the new normal.
FTC staff support the proposal by the Texas Supreme Court to allow for alternative means of accreditation.
Even if you accept the president's assertion of an "armed conflict" with drug smugglers, blowing apart survivors of a boat strike would be a war crime.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks