Government Officials' Internet Browsing Histories Are Not Agency Records under FOIA
The D.C. Circuit rejects an effort to obtain internet browsing histories under the Freedom of Information Act
The D.C. Circuit rejects an effort to obtain internet browsing histories under the Freedom of Information Act
Two professors have proposed using the CRA to authorize agency actions and avoid the filibuster. Would it work?
Last week, the CRA was used for the first time to repeal regulations adopted by a Republican President.
An interesting administrative law tidbit in one of today's Supreme Court decisions.
What seems like a gun rights case actually presents some important questions of administrative law.
The Supreme Court properly concludes that there is no standing to challenge a legal provision that has no effect.
The Sixth Circuit made quick work of a district court opinion concluding Ohio lacked standing to sue for overdue Census data.
Focusing on time and the "nondelegation baseline" would be one way to constrain excessive delegation.
Two recent papers examine the state experience with nondelegation.
Senate Democrats vote to repeal a Trump Administration regulation easing restrictions on methane emissions.
My contribution to the online symposium on Sunstein & Vermeule's Law & Leviathan
"Super Deference and Heightened Scrutiny" forthcoming in the Florida Law Review
A series of essays weighing Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule's effort to redeem the administrative state.
A long awaited decision in a challenge to the Trump Administration's "bump stock" ban tees up some interesting questions for the High Court's review.
The CRA may offer Democrats a quick and easy way to repeal Trump Administration regulations, if they are willing to use it.
A newly released OLC opinion asserts the White House can require independent agencies to comply with Executive Orders on regulatory review.
On delegation, time, and congressional capacity.
The court improbably concludes that the execution protocol is illegal, but does not enjoin its use
A Supreme Court Preview panel that focuses on administrative law.
A burst of recent scholarship exploring the Originalist case for and against the nondelegation doctrine.
The North American Butterfly Association will get the chance to press its Fifth Amendment claims against the Department of Homeland Security.
The Court adds an important Appointments Clause case to the docket.
Multiple significant opinions from the D.C. Circuit on Judge Griffith's last day.
Faced with a choice between the Trump Administration and the law, these judges had no problem following the law.
In response to a Trump Executive Order, the Justice Department seeks to diminish the import of agency guidance.
A collection of essays analyzing one of the more important administrative law decisions of the October 2019 term.
The FCC did not even seek to defend its authority to impose the conditions.
Even the Acting Secretary might not actually be an Acting Secretary.
On the loss of a remarkable intellect and jurist.
At the same time, the court punts on whether the House has standing to challenge allegedly unlawful expenditure by Executive Branch.
Yet again, the Chief Justice shows his distaste for preliminary injunctions.
Department of Homeland Security
The lack of Senate-confirmed officers at DHS is a serious problem.
The lawsuit raises a variety of important issues, including a nondelegation challenge. It could turn out to be a very significant case.
On the penultimate day of the October 2019 term, the Supreme Court expands the ministerial exception and upholds exemptions to the contraception coverage mandate.
In a decision considering federal limitations on robocalls, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its longstanding approach to severability.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejects a procedural trick used by FERC to avoid judicial review.
If the U.S. Postal Service and the Postal Regulatory Commission disagree, does the case belong in federal court?
Professor Christopher Walker explores a potential wrinkle in the DACA decision.
Professor Zach Price on the Chief Justice Roberts' Decision in Dept. of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
In what appears to be a quite narrow ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts holds that if Trump wants to get rid of DACA, he'll have to try again.
A unanimous panel concludes the Department of Health and Human Services Lacked Statutory Authority to Impose the Rule
A local judge has concluded the State Health Director likely exceeded her powers under the Ohio Constitution
An under-the-radar environmental lawsuit could provide the Supreme Court another opportunity to revive the nondelegation doctrine.
In a brief exchange during a recent oral argument, the Justice suggested the Court should reconsider giving states "special solicitude" under Massachusetts v. EPA
We submitted another strange bedfellows amicus brief on severability in the Texas ACA case.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10