Will President Biden Have Greater Control Over Independent Agencies than His Predecessors?
A newly released OLC opinion asserts the White House can require independent agencies to comply with Executive Orders on regulatory review.
A newly released OLC opinion asserts the White House can require independent agencies to comply with Executive Orders on regulatory review.
On delegation, time, and congressional capacity.
The court improbably concludes that the execution protocol is illegal, but does not enjoin its use
A Supreme Court Preview panel that focuses on administrative law.
A burst of recent scholarship exploring the Originalist case for and against the nondelegation doctrine.
The North American Butterfly Association will get the chance to press its Fifth Amendment claims against the Department of Homeland Security.
The Court adds an important Appointments Clause case to the docket.
Multiple significant opinions from the D.C. Circuit on Judge Griffith's last day.
Faced with a choice between the Trump Administration and the law, these judges had no problem following the law.
In response to a Trump Executive Order, the Justice Department seeks to diminish the import of agency guidance.
A collection of essays analyzing one of the more important administrative law decisions of the October 2019 term.
The FCC did not even seek to defend its authority to impose the conditions.
Even the Acting Secretary might not actually be an Acting Secretary.
On the loss of a remarkable intellect and jurist.
At the same time, the court punts on whether the House has standing to challenge allegedly unlawful expenditure by Executive Branch.
Yet again, the Chief Justice shows his distaste for preliminary injunctions.
Department of Homeland Security
The lack of Senate-confirmed officers at DHS is a serious problem.
The lawsuit raises a variety of important issues, including a nondelegation challenge. It could turn out to be a very significant case.
On the penultimate day of the October 2019 term, the Supreme Court expands the ministerial exception and upholds exemptions to the contraception coverage mandate.
In a decision considering federal limitations on robocalls, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its longstanding approach to severability.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejects a procedural trick used by FERC to avoid judicial review.
If the U.S. Postal Service and the Postal Regulatory Commission disagree, does the case belong in federal court?
Professor Christopher Walker explores a potential wrinkle in the DACA decision.
Professor Zach Price on the Chief Justice Roberts' Decision in Dept. of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
In what appears to be a quite narrow ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts holds that if Trump wants to get rid of DACA, he'll have to try again.
A unanimous panel concludes the Department of Health and Human Services Lacked Statutory Authority to Impose the Rule
A local judge has concluded the State Health Director likely exceeded her powers under the Ohio Constitution
An under-the-radar environmental lawsuit could provide the Supreme Court another opportunity to revive the nondelegation doctrine.
In a brief exchange during a recent oral argument, the Justice suggested the Court should reconsider giving states "special solicitude" under Massachusetts v. EPA
We submitted another strange bedfellows amicus brief on severability in the Texas ACA case.
Why does it matter is a federal agency is independent of Presidential control? Ask the Department of Defense.
CNN reports that Attorney General Barr is (again) voicing opposition to DOJ's argument that zeroing out the mandate penalty should upend the entire law.
A review of Richard Epstein's latest book: The Dubious Morality of Modern Administrative Law
The NLRB's prosecution of a conservative journalist should be worrisome.
A Symposium at The Regulatory Review engages with "Delegation and Time," and the question of whether Congress is capable of addressing nondelegation concerns.
A high-profile gun case actually presents meaty questions of administrative law
Today's cert grant is based on the importance of the case, not the quality of the arguments
An important and thoughtful opinion that potentially invalidates Trump Administration refugee and asylum policies.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau could be completely independent of the next occupant of the White House.
In which the Board of Immigration Appeals decides it can ignore appellate court rulings and is nearly held in contempt.
An interesting amicus brief by Professor John Harrison in Seila Law LLC v. CFPB
A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit finds the plaintiffs lack Article III standing in Juliana v. U.S.
Newly released data suggests Census analysts dramatically over-estimated the extent to which a citizenship question would discourage responses.
As if there wasn't enough going on this week, a federal appellate court issues a significant (and significantly flawed) ruling in the latest Obamacare challenge