The War on COVID Has Become a Quagmire. Americans Need an Exit Strategy.
Like the war on drugs and the war on terror before it, the war on COVID is a futile, deeply destructive campaign, and Americans want out.
Like the war on drugs and the war on terror before it, the war on COVID is a futile, deeply destructive campaign, and Americans want out.
The answer, as Tyler Cowen and Matthew Yglesias, argue, is probably not. But political ignorance is still a serious problem.
Seven out of 10 Americans say "it's time we accept COVID is here to stay and we just need to get on with our lives." Politicians are taking notice.
The president is waiting until children, who have always faced an infinitesimal risk from COVID-19, are "more protected."
"The District’s indoor mask requirements will be dialed back on March 1, 2022," said Bowser.
The cost of 'free' tests is really going up when you look at insurance premiums.
Some lawmakers should try double-masking their hypocrisy.
Rochelle Walensky says "now is not the moment" to stop forcing masks on children. Democratic politicians increasingly disagree.
But not so fast, Angelenos. No return to normal for you.
The agency further undermines its credibility by desperately trying to back up conclusions it has already reached.
Delta CEO Ed Bastian asked U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland to create a special no-fly list for passengers convicted of creating onboard disruptions.
The children have less to fear from COVID-19 than she does.
Plus: Is Web3 a scam? Does the Joe Rogan/Spotify controversy have anything to do with Section 230? And more...
If California politicians think the mask mandate is stupid, they should lead the charge to get rid of it.
Phase 1 testing begins on new vaccine based on mRNA advances.
Plus: National debt tops $30 trilion, Whoopi Goldberg suspended over Holocaust comments, and more...
That recommendation, which never had a firm basis, is even harder to justify in the current context.
"My servers are not lesser people," said owner Eric Flannery. "They don't need to be masked. They don't carry disease."
From to-go cocktail bans to Neil Young to teachers unions, the pandemic has provided a convenient pretext for selfish advancement.
Supporters of that policy assume it works, then desperately search for evidence to validate that conviction.
Plus: The ERA returns (again), Rep. Nancy Mace's marijuana mission, and more...
That process takes a long time, and the result would face the same legal objection cited by the Supreme Court.
The country, which has a much lower fatality rate than the U.S., eschewed lockdowns in favor of information.
After more than a decade of subversion, the Supreme Court has a chance to rectify this situation.
The New York State Supreme Court ruled that Governor Hochul and the health commissioner did not have the authority to mandate a masking requirement
Maybe it's because pandemic policies are forcing them to continue being anxious.
School choice is the best alternative for parents who are reasonably frustrated with this insanity.
A Wisconsin judge treats health care workers like serfs, legally tied to the workplace they'd like to leave.
Nationwide, newly reported infections have been falling since January 14.
Judge Lawrence VanDyke included a satirical opinion that his colleagues can use when they decide otherwise.
Schools in Flint, Michigan, are extending the virtual learning period for the foreseeable future. Haven't we learned that virtual learning comes at too high a cost?
Starbucks has decided the vaccine mandate isn't good for their business
John Roberts, Neil Gorsuch, and Sonia Sotomayor have all denied Nina Totenberg's story about a SCOTUS dispute over masking.
Where omicron plummets, COVID-19 restrictions on our pandemic-damaged children need to end. Let's throw 'em a big party!
Ron DeSantis killed people because Florida didn't impose tougher rules, we're told. But it's not true.
Harvard University is easing up on onerous restrictions against students that test COVID-19 positive. Does this signal a shift to normalcy for college students?
Australian researchers used changes in home prices and rents to tease out how much people were willing to spend to avoid the country's harshest lockdown.
Why did it take so long?
And now that the omicron variant is in retreat, everyone gets them for free. Great timing, guys.
The question for the Supreme Court was not whether the policy was wise but whether it was legal.
The science isn't actually on school districts' side.
The crux of the argument is the distinction "between occupational risk and risk more generally."
Some epidemiologists estimate that the actual number of new infections peaked last week.
Plus: Civil war fantasies, a challenge to California's ban on felons becoming EMTs, and more...
Omicron patients were much less likely to have severe symptoms.
Plus: Waiting lists for public defenders, inflation boogeymen, and more...
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks