Sorry, Liberals: Protecting the Medicaid Status Quo Won't Save Patients
The program desperately needs radical surgery
The program desperately needs radical surgery
New Senate legislation moves the Republican bill in the direction of Obamacare.
Liberal attachment to the worst insurance program in the civilized world is mind-boggling.
A Middletown, Ohio, lawmaker wants paramedics to stop treating to overdose patients after two strikes.
Nothing gets past Senator Nanny.
Dental therapists can provide access to more care, but the American Dental Association keeps trying to stop them.
"I take the Hippocratic oath seriously that my job is to relieve pain and suffering," says Dr. Forest Tennant, a California pain specialist who patients from across the nation are flocking to see.
Anchoring abortion access to the insurance market won't make it more affordable. But it will result in a lot of legal drama...
Ohio could freeze expansion enrollments next year, ignoring the governor's pleas.
Assisted suicide, experimental medical treatments, and slippery slopes
What part of "First, Do No MORE Harm" do congressional Republicans not understand?
After abruptly postponing a vote, dealmaking continues.
The GOP health plan tacitly accepts Obamacare's central premise: that governments should micromanage insurance markets.
The Republican health care plan wouldn't solve the problems Republicans say they want to solve.
The argument carries a powerful emotional charge but it isn't a particularly constructive or clear-minded way to think or talk about writing laws.
It's one more way the GOP repeal bill resembles Obamacare.
State Supreme Court will hear challenge to Certificate of Need laws on Monday.
Congressional Republicans promise to achieve greater frugality in Medicaid without inflicting more hardship. It's not gonna happen.
The state is spending $37 million a month on recipients potentially not eligible for the program.
Tea Party senators claim to be "open to negotiation" yet insist on repealing Obamacare, which no version of the AHCA has come close to doing.
The draft legislation represents a total failure of Republican policy imagination.
Paul's "Read the Bills" resolution would change Senate rules to allow one day of transparency for every 20 pages of a bill's length.
They haven't found any that work yet, but Democrats continue running political experiments with expanding government's role in health care.
Why are Republicans rushing a bill no one likes? Here are five theories.
A medical marijuana provider unsuccessfully argues that improper jury instructions made his conviction invalid.
Most gun-related deaths among minors are homicides, and four-fifths involve teenagers.
Neo-Malthusianism in the Sunday New York Times
Defying its own data, the CDC continues to obscure the enormous harm-reducing potential of e-cigarettes.
The bipartisan CARERS Act prohibits federal prosecution of patients and providers who comply with state law.
Hospitals use CON laws to stop potential competition, limiting care for patients and opportunities for doctors.
The Senate GOP is relying on the same opaque process they accused Democrats of using to pass Obamacare.
The Senate GOP bill is likely to expand subsidies, preserve regulations, and delay the Medicaid rollback.
Make pharmaceutical competition great again.
Would the Trump administration give states permission to pursue government-run health care? That's what California and New York would need.
Lack of single payer hasn't seemed to hinder superior progress made in terms of life expectancy gains in the U.S. since UN records start in 1960.
Contrary to what The New York Times claims, the outcry over EpiPen prices has made them lower.
The sales tax' big brother tends to cripple growth, lower wages, and promote inequality, economists warn. Will that stop California from doing it?
This is how the GOP treats their top legislative priorities.
This is why the GOP health care bill is stalled in the Senate.
A rule is under review that would (reportedly) relax the hotly debated requirement.
Under Trump's budget, Medicaid spending would reach the highest level in U.S. history.
Bioethicists in Britain say yes. But there are no such limits in the U.S. yet.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks