My New Book on Academic Freedom Now Available
You Can't Teach That! is in fine bookstores now
You Can't Teach That! is in fine bookstores now
The bill would allow the Education Department to effectively force colleges to suppress a wide range of protected speech.
DEI statements are political litmus tests.
Plus: A listener asks if there is any place libertarians can go to start their own country or city state.
"If we can't trust ourselves as a culture to accommodate ideas we don't like," the novelist said at the Library of Congress, "then our ideas lose their value as well, because they become authoritarian."
A member of Congress weighs in, and the university president speaks out
An Israeli minister demands that Princeton University prohibit a professor from assigning a controversial book
A response to Porter v. North Carolina State University
State tries to bar Stanford researchers from testifying against it
Professor suspended for criticizing policies of Texas lieutenant governor
Texas A&M placed a professor on paid leave for criticizing Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick in a lecture on the opioid crisis.
Blame university administrators.
Political appointees should have no role in faculty hiring decisions.
Is "intramural" professorial speech protected by the First Amendment?
But Chris Rufo bragged about breaking the law anyway.
Doctor sanctioned for comments to journalists about transgender athletes
James Madison University's debate team says that "free speech should not extend to requiring us to platform or amplify ideas that are exclusionary, discriminatory, or hostile."
Martha Pollack rejects the pernicious premise that universities should protect students from offensive ideas.
How bad is that divisive concepts bill?
Legislative showdown looming on tenure and academic freedom
North Dakota attack on tenure barely defeated
"Professors are not mouthpieces for the government," says FIRE's Joe Cohn. "For decades, the Supreme Court of the United States has defended professors' academic freedom from governmental intrusion."
The bill now bans a battery of poorly-defined "Critical Theory" concepts, and prevents schools from funding programs that promote "diversity, equity, and inclusion."
A poorly drafted and conceptually ambitious upending of norms of state university independence
Some of the proposals pose real threats to free inquiry
Florida's H.B. 999 claims to support "viewpoint diversity" and "intellectual rigor." It does just the opposite.
"My artwork is unapologetic," said the artist. "Sometimes it can be very political. Sometimes it can be very controversial."
Amna Khalid and Jeffrey Aaron Snyder argue that we should not kid ourselves about the threat university DEI bureaucracies pose to academic freedom, but is there a better way?
"Hamline subjected López Prater to the foregoing adverse actions because . . . she did not conform her conduct to the specific beliefs of a Muslim sect," the lawsuit states.
Retraction Watch prevails in a California appellate case.
"If Hamline won't listen to free speech advocates or faculty across the country, they'll have to listen to their accreditor," said FIRE attorney Alex Morey, who filed the complaint.
"Students were misreading exam questions at an astonishing rate," says Maitland Jones Jr.
Prominent social psychologist and NYU professor calls the requirement “explicitly ideological.”
The policy, released this week, places unconstitutional prohibitions on faculty speech.
More universities than ever are now requiring lengthy DEI statements from job applicants. Is that good for academic freedom?
A new survey from FIRE shows one-third of college students report it is “sometimes” or “always” acceptable to shout down a controversial campus speaker.
The best-selling author of Why People Believe Weird Things sees a fundamental clash between wokeness and scientific inquiry.
The science writer and journalist talks identity politics, wokeness, trans athletes, and why his goal is to find out what is true rather than to "be right."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks