How Much Would an American-Made Toaster Actually Cost?
A lot more than Oren Cass and J.D. Vance want you to think, and Americans wouldn't like the tradeoffs necessary.
A lot more than Oren Cass and J.D. Vance want you to think, and Americans wouldn't like the tradeoffs necessary.
If the former president wins the 2024 race, the circumstances he would inherit are far more challenging, and several of his policy ideas are destructive.
The America of the past grew in spite of tariffs, not because of them.
Neither Harris nor Trump has a plan to address national debt, but they dramatically differ on taxation.
The costs of steep tariffs and a higher corporate income tax extend far beyond the advertised targets.
One official was concerned that lifting tariffs would lead to "lots of questions from domestic dairy producers."
Plus: Brat summer revisited, Telegram CEO arrested, and more...
Both campaigns represent variations on a theme of big, fiscally irresponsible, hyper-interventionist government.
A half-baked idea that is just as dubious as Donald Trump's tariffs.
Plus: Special guest Ben Dreyfuss joins the editors this week.
A new poll challenges the protectionist narrative currently dominating both sides of the political aisle.
A new Cato Institute/YouGov survey finds contradictory attitudes on trade policy, and widespread ignorance. The survey also suggests a potentially promising political strategy for free trade advocates.
Seventy-five percent of respondents are concerned that tariffs will raise the cost of the things they buy, yet neither Trump nor Harris has suggested lowering them.
The New Right talks a big populist game, but their policies hurt the people they're supposed to help.
Tariffs lead to trade wars, limit competition, and reduce innovation. But both Trump and Biden want more of them.
Growth of regulation slowed under former President Trump, but it still increased.
Opening night of the Republican National Convention programmed a central issue with a Trumpian twist: "Make America Wealthy Again."
Yes, trade tariffs cause higher prices. Trump never understood that, and now Biden apparently has forgotten it.
"I don’t care to replace a left-wing nanny state with a right-wing nanny state," the onetime presidential hopeful said this week.
Although former President Donald Trump's deregulatory agenda would make some positive changes, it's simply not enough.
Yes, cheap imports hurt some American companies. But protectionist trade policy harms many more Americans than it helps.
And you have to admit, he's got a point.
In an interview, former National Security Advisor Robert O'Brien admitted that "the Chinese didn’t honor" the terms of the deal, years after it was clear.
In 2017, the last full year before Trump's tariffs were imposed, America's overall trade deficit was $517 billion. By 2023, it had grown to $785 billion.
Plus: Who are the editors' favorite vice presidents of all time?
Public ignorance has a big impact on voter atttudes on a major issue in the 2024 election.
Despite both presidential candidates touting protectionist trade policy, tariffs do little to address the underlying factors that make it difficult for U.S. manufacturers to compete in the global marketplace.
"The scale of trade barriers proposed by candidate Trump is unprecedented."
Bad for consumers, bad for American industry, bad for his administration's own environmental goals, and bad for an increasingly irrational executive branch.
Plus, an AI-generated recipe for garlic lovers' shrimp scampi
The economics of tariffs have not changed in the past eight years. Marco Rubio has.
There are many pervasive myths about the U.S. tax code. Here are a few.
If higher tariffs were the solution to anything, wouldn't there be evidence of that by now?
Plus: A listener asks if Trump or Biden have done anything to secure the blessings of liberty.
A 10 percent tariff on all imports would trigger more inflation at the grocery store, particularly for products such as fresh fruit and coffee.
Economic nationalists are claiming the deal endangers "national security" to convince Americans that a good deal for investors, employees, and the U.S. economy will somehow make America less secure. That's nonsense.
Support for industrial policy and protectionism are supposed to help the working class. Instead, these ideas elevate the already privileged.
The debate is over. Trump's steel tariffs failed.
The U.S. International Trade Commission voted unanimously to reject a nakedly protectionist proposal that would have made canned goods more expensive.
Plus: A listener asks if it should become the norm for all news outlets to require journalists to disclose their voting records.
Regulations, tariffs, and other government-imposed hurdles reward American car companies for building bigger, more expensive trucks and keep out any potential competitors.
Should there be any limits to a president's power to centrally plan the economy? Apparently not.
That's bad news for Americans.
Tariffs of 25 percent introduced under Donald Trump have been allowed to remain in place, and Biden may tack on even more to shield American firms from competition.
There's no good reason for the government to block Americans' access to cheaper tin cans.
Another round of federal intervention to prevent its sale makes no sense.
The rules would allow the government to temporarily ease restrictions on WIC formula purchases during a shortage. But those restrictions shouldn't exist in the first place.
At nearly every turn, the infrastructure package opted for policies that limited supplies, hiked prices, added paperwork, and grew government.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10