A Harvard Plan To Use Massive COVID-19 Testing To Reopen the Economy
This proposal might work, but it's doubtful that our politicians and president are competent enough to pull it off.
This proposal might work, but it's doubtful that our politicians and president are competent enough to pull it off.
The White House announced a temporary suspension of tariff payments as a way to stimulate the American economy, but the relief will not apply to tariffs on steel, aluminum, or imports from China.
We may find that we like making our own decisions.
The congresswoman claimed that Amazon is "refusing to provide basic protective equipment to workers." That's not true.
Plus: sensitive cellphone data swept up in coronavirus containment efforts, and more...
"A national shutdown is not a sustainable long-term situation," Trump said Thursday evening. "We are not opening all at once, but one careful step at a time."
Plus: Puerto Rico criminalizes fake news about COVID-19, wide geographic disparity in U.S. income growth, and more...
The $349 billion loan program is meant to help small companies hit hard by social distancing.
In a new collection, the economic historian documents how classical liberals pushed for abolition and equality in 19th-century America.
It's not the politicians who have the power to reopen America, or at least the parts that are now closed. It's individuals, families, businesses, and religious congregations.
And more coronavirus stimulus spending could send that number soaring higher.
Don't let states and cities get away with onerous rules that in no way help to contain COVID-19.
A New York Times Magazine forum highlights the moral implications of suppressing economic activity.
General Motors is being charged import taxes on parts it needs to build ventilators. Its requests for relief have gone unanswered.
Export restrictions only make sense if you're unable to understand the obvious consequences of that policy.
From March 26 to April 8, the number of projected deaths from coronavirus dropped from 81,000 to 60,000. What should we do with such information?
In two separate op-eds yesterday, the senators pitch central planning as the best response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Unclear terms, unrealistic loan forgiveness, a site unprepared for launch, and a bottomless demand for cash
The president's daily press briefings are disturbing because of what they reveal, not what they obscure.
The COVID-19 crisis has resuscitated some seriously bad ideas.
The CARES Act gives the federal government the power to take large ownership stakes in the airlines and dictate much of their operations.
Pandemic patients get better care when medical professionals are free to work where they're needed. The same will undoubtedly be true of regular patients after COVID-19 has left our lives.
Event production is one of the less visible victims of the virus. Recreating their services when such companies die won't be easy.
“Can an independent federal agency that is supposed to regulate commodity futures assert power over every single purchase or sale of a commodity?”
The failure to conduct early and wide testing left politicians ignorant of basic facts about the COVID-19 epidemic.
President Donald Trump, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi all agree that a fourth spending bill will happen in April but are haggling over the cost.
The last time we sent this much money to the Kennedy Center, it was for a pair of Hamilton tickets.
A global pandemic has done what 30 years of internet manifestoes never accomplished: a mass migration into our screens.
A misleading statistic has made the rounds. But it’s based on a misreading of a government report that says no such thing.
When Americans feel like the future will be worse than the past, reactionary and socialist ideologies ascend.
Pending minimum service rules would require airlines to keep operating a certain number of flights, regardless of how little demand there is for air travel.
Q&A with Duke's Michael C. Munger, who also believes that big cities will see rationing and that higher education will never be the same.
The Duke economist and political scientist discusses the response to COVID-19, the coming recession, and the end of higher ed as we know it.
The Club for Growth prides itself on holding lawmakers accountable "by publicizing their voting record." Except, well…not right now.
Plus: The feds are still targeting Juul, Call of Duty wins First Amendment lawsuit, and more...
The real action in the coming months lies between those two extremes.
The free market adjusts. We don't need "production acts" to tell us what to do.
The Kentucky Republican took on Donald Trump and Nancy Pelosi to fight against the $2 trillion coronavirus spending package. He's just getting started.
Though focused on manufacturing and banking, this study sees economic optimism in quick and thorough interventions to keep people isolated.
The CARES Act plunges the nation into a crash course on experimental economics.—and we're the lab rats.
But he has raised his estimate of the virus's reproduction number, which implies a lower fatality rate than his research group initially assumed.
The mandates would be retroactive, potentially punishing businesses for violating rules they did not even know existed.
That's a huge concern as forecasters expect the U.S. unemployment rate in the months to come to surpass that seen during the depths of the Great Depression.
The short-term rental service seeks 100,000 hosts to set space aside for those working to fight the pandemic.
Much about the COVID-19 outbreak has been unprecedented and historic, but until now it's been difficult to quantify exactly how serious a blow the virus would deal to the U.S. economy.
Plus: COVID-19 in prisons and jails, Trump campaign threatens TV stations, state disparities in new coronavirus cases, and more...
Creativity and selflessness are on display everywhere.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks