Can the U.S. Government Tell Chinese People Apart?
Drone maker DJI claims the Pentagon has unfairly smeared it as an arm of the Chinese military based on a mix-up of Chinese names.
Drone maker DJI claims the Pentagon has unfairly smeared it as an arm of the Chinese military based on a mix-up of Chinese names.
A new report shows that politically connected companies were better able to navigate the exclusion process and avoid paying tariffs during the Trump administration.
Yes. But there might be one more key opportunity to rein in presidential powers over trade.
A lot more than Oren Cass and J.D. Vance want you to think, and Americans wouldn't like the tradeoffs necessary.
And probably because Republicans have foolishly abandoned it as a unifying theme.
Untangling the roots of Vance's odd political evolution.
The former presidential candidate discusses the ideological tensions within the America First movement.
If voting was the solution to the ills of America's working class, wouldn't it have worked by now?
The Ohio Senator is one of the Party's leading advocates of protectionism, economic planning, and immigration restrictions.
"I don’t care to replace a left-wing nanny state with a right-wing nanny state," the onetime presidential hopeful said this week.
In 2017, the last full year before Trump's tariffs were imposed, America's overall trade deficit was $517 billion. By 2023, it had grown to $785 billion.
Vance thinks that jobs lost because of incompetent central planning don't matter—but that jobs lost to immigrants do.
Vivek Ramaswamy isn't the first to advocate this badly wrong idea. But there's still no good justification for it.
"The scale of trade barriers proposed by candidate Trump is unprecedented."
It's a good thing opponents of the move can appeal to the liberal values of free speech, free association, and equal treatment under law.
Vance's latest gambit is pretty nonsensical, intellectually embarrassing, and obviously self-serving. But that doesn't mean that it's not dangerous too.
Breaking down Rubio's factually flawed and logically incoherent call for more government involvement in the economy.
Economic nationalists are claiming the deal endangers "national security" to convince Americans that a good deal for investors, employees, and the U.S. economy will somehow make America less secure. That's nonsense.
And the real kicker is that Intel was probably going to create those jobs without taxpayers funding anything.
Both companies consented to the deal. Why should they have to get permission from the president to do business?
Just say no to empowering government actors to put their thumbs on the scale on behalf of certain sectors.
Should there be any limits to a president's power to centrally plan the economy? Apparently not.
His speech in Davos challenged the growing worldwide trend of increased government involvement in economic affairs.
Companies based outside the United States employ 7.9 million Americans. Foreign investment isn't something to be feared or blocked, but welcomed.
The Cato Institute has posted a Spanish-language version of the article I coauthored with Alex Nowrasteh.
Coauthored with Cato Institute scholar Alex Nowrasteh.
More than five years after it began, former President Donald Trump's trade war is still spiraling out of control.
A new report from the GAO highlights how America's system of sugar subsidies and tariffs costs consumers about $3.5 billion every year.
Donald Trump's latest argument for protectionism is undermined by the realities of his own trade policies.
The "Tariff Man" promises to strike again.
Panic over China's rapid economic growth has fueled all manner of big-government proposals. They're looking even more foolish now.
The average working woman in 2023 earns enough money to buy a Barbie doll every 33 minutes. In 1959, it took nearly two hours.
A new document with more than 80 signatories puts liberty, not government, at the heart of the conservative movement.
Plus: A listener asks if the Roundtable has given the arguments of those opposed to low-skilled immigration a fair hearing.
Hawley might call them "tariffs on China," but that's obvious nonsense: Tariffs are paid by Americans.
J.D. Vance and Co. are trying to give themselves permission to wield public power unconstitutionally.
Cass says industrial policy will only work if the politicians can put aside political disagreements and partisan agendas. In other words, industrial policy will never work.
The warning signs are flashing "don't be like China."
Unless Congress takes action, those tariffs will return on January 1. And the baby formula shortage hasn't yet passed.
The GOP has hit the dead end of Trump-style personality-cult populism. It's time to try having ideas.
What differentiates national conservatives from some other right-wing varietals is the desire to use government to destroy their enemies.
The racist Buffalo mass murderer's ideology drew on dangerous ideas common on both the ethnonationalist right and the far left.
Plus: The editors each point out one key disagreement they have with one another.
The former venture capitalist will face Rep. Tim Ryan, the Democratic nominee, in November's general election.
Countries insulating themselves against future sanctions may block trade that lifted billions from misery.
The U.S. Innovation and Competition Act is a lobbyist-crafted proposal that funnels emergency spending to politically connected special interests.
Plus: Supreme Court to rule on Catholic foster agencies, tech associations sue over social media law in Florida, and more…