Holding Protest Leaders Liable for Others' Violence Threatens First Amendment Rights
A lawsuit against a Black Lives Matter activist could have a chilling impact on constitutionally protected activity.
A lawsuit against a Black Lives Matter activist could have a chilling impact on constitutionally protected activity.
Playboy fired the former porn star after she tweeted in defense of Hamas.
"Plaintiff cannot likely show that her rejection of Dr Greeson's alleged conduct was the basis for her asserted adverse educational action (i.e., failure of the Qualifying Exam)—Plaintiff appears to have failed the Qualifying Exam every which way."
to go forward based partly on allegations that "DPH caused the suspension of [Alliance of Los Angeles County Parents'] Twitter Account."
Houston officials say they'll keep fining activists for feeding homeless people, calling it "a health and safety issue."
A strong case is made against the ban on gun possession by persons subject to a DVRO.
OpenAI tried to remove Mark Walters' lawsuit to federal court, but has now withdrawn that attempt.
The issue was rejected because it "jeopardizes the good order and security of the institution."
So holds an Eleventh Circuit panel; Judge Andrew Brasher's concurring opinion that notes the potential First Amendment problems with imposing liability for such speech.
The former OnlyFans star and outspoken libertarian defender of sex workers considers the acceleration of government crackdowns on online porn, the sexual revolution, and sex work.
Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case
In light of the state's marijuana reforms, the court says, the odor of weed is not enough to establish probable cause.
"For the most part, the American Civil Liberties Union, Young Americans for Freedom, and the Babylon Bee don't see eye to eye."
"The subpoena is ... a classic ‘fishing expedition’ in constitutionally protected waters.”
With subplots about bite mark evidence and asset forfeiture, it's a parade of shady cop practices.
The case stemmed from user challenges asking that a public library remove Gender Queer: A Memoir, or at least keep children from getting it.
Kids will grow up to value freedom only if they’re raised in an environment where it’s treated as good.
"Respondent presented this court with a credible and reasonable interpretation of the meaning behind her words, i.e., that she posted the above-noted tweets as an expression of her anger, fear, and frustration with the violence taking place around her and in disagreement with some of the sentiments she saw being expressed by others on Twitter."
How to battle identity politics and defend liberal values of universalism, free speech, and open inquiry
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook at 1 p.m. Eastern this Thursday for a discussion with Aella about the escalating government crackdown on online porn, the sexual revolution, and sex work.
The decision is another rebuke to states that have imposed broad, location-specific limits on the right to bear arms.
Critics have argued the legal action is a meritless SLAPP suit.
If Facebook et al. are pushing a "radical leftist narrative," why don’t they have a constitutional right to do that?
FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel has initiated a new rulemaking that would enact what are largely the same net neutrality rules tried back in 2016.
Plus: Donald Trump's creative accounting, those sneaky vegans, brain drain, and more...
Plus: A listener asks the editors to weigh in on a hypothetical executive order to establish an American Climate Corps.
"The police are free to ask questions, and the public is free to ignore them," wrote a federal judge.
A divided board recommends reforms as Congress debates renewing snooping authority.
After a divided ruling, laws limiting such treatments in Tennessee and Kentucky will go into force.
The laws require major social media platforms to host content they disapprove of for substantive reasons.
The late California senator always seemed to err on the side of more government power and less individual freedom.
"Defendants' argument, which attempts to draw an ill-defined connection between a lawful gun raffle hosted on social media, and obviously tragic and unlawful mass shootings at schools, remains predicated upon numerous, dubious inferences ...—if not upon rank speculation."
"[E]ccentricity and being off-putting is not a criminal offense," even when the speaker mentions the listener's children and other personal details.
The judge ruled that the law was unconstitutionally overbroad, vague, and viewpoint discrimination.
No place is truly safe for dissidents when governments see no limits to their authority.
Before correcting the record, the former president's spokesman inadvertently implicated him in a federal crime.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.