The Bad Data Backing Josh Hawley's Attack on Abortion Pills
A new study being used to call for mifepristone restrictions relies on vague and dubious definitions of drug-related complications.
A new study being used to call for mifepristone restrictions relies on vague and dubious definitions of drug-related complications.
The IGO Anti-Boycott Act would dramatically expand U.S. anti-boycott laws. The House quietly postponed a vote after running into unexpected Republican opposition.
A Supreme Court case could determine whether Americans own their digital data—or whether the government can take that information without a warrant.
Earlier this year, state Rep. Laurel Libby made a post criticizing trans women in women's sports. Her refusal to apologize has cost Libby her right to speak on the House floor and vote on legislation.
Campus protests against Israel have revived debates over the limits of First Amendment protections.
The brief gives a good explanation of why such actions violate the First Amendment.
A U.S. district judge called Mohsen Mahdawi’s detention a “great harm to a person who has been charged with no crime.”
A medical dispute over jaundice treatment prompted the state to take custody of Rodney and Temecia Jackson’s daughter for more than three weeks.
"It is unthinkable that a person in a free society could be snatched from the street, imprisoned, and threatened with deportation for expressing an opinion the government dislikes," says FIRE.
Congress just approved a new online censorship scheme under the auspices of thwarting revenge porn and AI-generated "nonconsensual intimate visual depictions."
Please feel free to forward this to anyone you think might be interested.
The administration's lawyers claim that this was justified by Khalil's likelihood of escape.
It’s a small step in the right direction for self-defense rights.
The federal judge rightly rejects the request.
A new ACLU lawsuit argues that the government still is not giving alleged gang members the "notice" required by a Supreme Court order.
The memo says "Alien Enemies" aren't subject "to a judicial review of the removal in any court of the United States."
The temporary restraining order allows time to challenge burdensome reporting requirement.
The journalist joins the show to discuss due process, immigration enforcement, and the growing tensions between the courts and the executive branch.
The law was passed 20 years ago, and enforcement finally looms.
Live by your own rule, Ruhle!
It appears many people are now eager to dispense with due process.
Two of his targets are seeking permanent injunctions against the president's blatantly unconstitutional executive orders.
"We have thousands of people that are ready to go out, and you can't have a trial for all of these people," Trump said.
These bills would require exactly that—and a lot more.
Longtime surgeon and Cato Institute fellow Jeffrey Singer argues that government overreach in health care undermines patient autonomy.
To remain independent, institutions of higher education should end their reliance on taxpayer money.
The president has launched a multifaceted crusade against speech that offends him.
The administration's demands extend far beyond its avowed concern about antisemitism and enforcement of "civil rights laws."
Plus: A listener asks who was the better president: Trump or Obama?
The president's lawyers also conflate fraud with defamation, misconstrue the commercial speech doctrine, and assert that false speech is not constitutionally protected.
"I blew a zero, so now you're trying to think I smoked weed?” Tayvin Galanakis asked the officer who arrested him in 2022. “That's what's going on. You can't do that, man.”
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10