Due Process Is Timely
The Supreme Court's recent civil forfeiture ruling and why due process matters today.
The Supreme Court's recent civil forfeiture ruling and why due process matters today.
At least this is so when defendant "also ... allegedly directed viewers of her post to click on her 'Likes' page where the video had been archived" (not clear what the judge would have thought if the case involved solely the "like").
Plus, does speech about a celebrity become "intentional infliction of emotional distress" when the celebrity is known to have been "trauma[tized]" by a violent crime?
"I know they are guilty," otherwise "they would not be in front of me," said town justice Richard Snyder, who resigned in December.
The full transcript shows the president's complaints about the editing of the interview are not just wildly hyperbolic and legally groundless. They are demonstrably false.
Donald Trump's complaints were always meritless, but CBS' capitulation sets a dangerous precedent for the future of the news media.
A federal district court discusses how the First Amendment limits liability for "hostile environment harassment" based on "speech on matters of public concern" in universities (public or private). And the reasoning may extend to Title VII liability on workplaces as well.
Brendan Carr has a clear record of threatening to suppress constitutionally protected speech.
FIRE’s executive V.P. discusses the Biden administration's failures, Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s influence on free speech, and the most pressing First Amendment issues facing the U.S. today.
Settling Trump’s CBS lawsuit won’t buy peace—it will sell out press freedom.
Elon Musk sues seven more companies for pulling advertising from his platform.
The right to a reasonable accommodation has produced some absurd results.
The company is worried that the president's complaints about a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris could block a pending merger.
“Plaintiff has not conducted this litigation as though it involves matters of a highly sensitive and personal nature—instead, she would cloak herself in pseudonymity, and the protections it affords, while publicly lobbing allegations at Defendant by name.”
The government failed to persuade the appeals court that 18-to-20-year-olds are not part of "the people" or that the age restriction is consistent with the "historical tradition of firearm regulation."
The settlement vindicates Kimberly Diei's First Amendment right to comment on sexually explicit rap songs without suffering government retaliation.
That's because it apparently covers only grants to foreign organizations operating abroad, and a 2020 Supreme Court decision generally held that the First Amendment doesn't apply in such situations.
Public records obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation show how sensitive police databases are used and abused.
The settlement of the civil case follows guilty pleas or convictions in related criminal cases.
These bills—in Indiana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and South Carolina—could also imperil IVF practices and threaten care for women with pregnancy complications.
The Michigan Court of Appeals just upheld the conviction, under a statute that requires showing of purpose to (among other things) "harass[]" or "molest[]," and reason to know that third parties would send the target unwanted and "harass[ing]" or "molest[ing]" messages. The statute doesn't require any showing that the accusations were false.
Biden's FDA pushed a prohibition that disproportionately targeted marginalized communities. Trump's reversal may mark a shift toward smarter drug policy.
Nunes and his family's farm can't sufficiently show damages, so the court doesn't have to reach any of the other elements of defamation.
"Make childhood great again," says state Sen. Lincoln Fillmore.
Though awkward and antiquated, the Second Amendment’s syntax and grammar unambiguously protect gun rights.
Politicians who’ve dropped the ball inevitably see the solution as reducing people's freedom.
The Sixth Circuit finds a city failed to provide adequate process before demolishing a condemned mobile home.
The Bank Secrecy Act regime forces banks to report customers to the government for an ever-growing list of “red flags.”
But at least he restored respect for a tariff-loving predecessor by renaming a mountain.
"Every day I confront a bill that wants to ban another Chinese company," the Kentucky senator tells Reason.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10