Is It 'Harassment' To Heckle Your Local Politician? A British Court Thinks So.
Two protesters in Wales were convicted for handing out pamphlets and filming an argument with their member of Parliament.
Two protesters in Wales were convicted for handing out pamphlets and filming an argument with their member of Parliament.
When anyone can have an air force, superpowers aren't as powerful as they used to be.
which is to say the court that is the most in favor of public access to court records in such cases.
A new law prohibits the state from requiring nonprofits to disclose the personal information of their supporters, protecting Americans’ First Amendment right to free association.
Like it or not, Gonzales v. Raich remains good law, and federal prohibition is constitutional under current doctrine.
though the court found the plaintiffs had standing to bring the claim, and gave them one last chance to amend their complaint to plausibly allege enough to allow the case to go forward.
If you think the government will only use these tools to track illegal immigrants, think again.
My wife and I built our defensive skills with six days of sweat, dust, and the right mindset.
More in Prof. Rebecca Scofield's defamation lawsuit against alleged psychic Ashley Guillard, based on Guillard's accusation that Scofield was involved in the Nov. 2022 murder of four University of Idaho students.
Although the school failed to properly assess whether the threat was valid, school officials determined that his expulsion didn’t violate due process.
The order also covered the man's family and public officials, as well as the lawyers in the case.
Reason confirmed reports of dysfunction and violence at one of those detention centers earlier this week.
Marco Rubio has announced a plan to deny visas to foreigners who censor Americans.
But he declines to conclude that another judge, against whom a complaint was lodged over participation in such a boycott, violated the rules.
Speech codes intended to battle misinformation are instead empowering the government to be the arbiter of truth.
President Trump is entitled to try to execute his immigration policy. He is not entitled, however, to violate the Constitution.
So the Ninth Circuit held today, by a 2-1 vote. I tentatively think the majority got it right as a matter of First Amendment law and statutory interpretation, though I think such statutes ought to be written to include some privacy exceptions as to gender identity and not just sex.
John Moore and Tanner Mansell were convicted of theft after they freed sharks they erroneously thought had been caught illegally.
A camera network developed to help find missing cars and persons is now being used for immigration enforcement.
A new Georgia law could protect Alexandra Woodward's parental decision—but it doesn't go into effect until July.
It's a reversal from his first term, when Trump himself ordered the creation of a database tracking excessive use of force.
Joel Alicea’s defense of originalism demonstrates broad applicability of the text-history method.
A Massachusetts 7th grader was sent home for wearing the shirt, though the school allows students to challenge the idea it conveyed.
The president's crusade against attorneys whose work offends him, which defies the First Amendment and undermines the right to counsel, has provoked several judicial rebukes.
Swedish authorities voted to criminalize the purchase or procurement of online sex acts, in a move targeting customers of webcam platforms and sites like OnlyFans.
Half the elevators at Federal Detention Center Miami are broken. Immigrant detainees are kept on lockdown, and lawyers can barely reach their clients.
What did that 1995 article trying to predict the Internet future get right? More amusingly, what did it get wrong?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks