Porn Sites Must Block VPNs To Comply With Indiana's Age-Verification Law, State Suggests in New Lawsuit
It's an insane—and frighteningly dystopian—interpretation of the law.
It's an insane—and frighteningly dystopian—interpretation of the law.
Katherine Dee examines how living online reshapes attention and behavior and makes the case for a more grounded, realistic way of using digital tools.
The proposed bills aim to revive and codify a 1971 Supreme Court ruling that allowed individuals to sue the feds for Fourth Amendment violations.
Reason's Robby Soave and Elizabeth Nolan Brown go head to head with Emily Jashinsky and Ryan Grim from Breaking Points in a thought-provoking debate about Big Tech.
Individuals and communities must take responsibility for their own safety.
This is Priscilla Villarreal’s second trip to the Supreme Court, which last year revived her First Amendment lawsuit.
"There was also evidence presented regarding Liza's alleged delusional thinking and hallucinations. Eli testified that Liza told him Kenneth was his physical father, but actor Chris Hemsworth was his spiritual father. Eli also testified that for years Liza had talked about having another daughter someday, whom she would name Phoebe, and Hemsworth would be the father. Brigham testified that Liza told him she believed Hemsworth was the children's father." Plus unschooling, unbathing, and more.
Plus: Universal child care polls well, DEI and generational dynamics, and more...
From birthright citizenship to tariffs, many of the president’s key policies run counter to the Constitution’s original meaning.
Plus: Chile elects a right-winger, Jimmy Lai gets convicted, midair collision narrowly averted, and more...
So concludes the Louisiana Supreme Court, though my sense is that other courts may well have decided this differently.
"[The coach's alleged statement] can reasonably be inferred as ... defamatory ... about Clary—that Clary himself was greedy and only interested in money and, as a result, abandoned [his] team and refused to play for Penn State."
The court concluded that a retraction likely wouldn't breach any publication contract, and that under the circumstances a temporary restraining order would be especially unjustified given the publisher's First Amendment rights.
As traditional gathering places disappear, market-based funding could expand parks, courts, and other spaces that help people reconnect without raising taxes.
The country's transition leader was selected not at the ballot box but on a 100,000-person Discord chat.
Most ICE arrestees are nonviolent or have no criminal convictions at all.
Which is what progressive fans of antitrust want, no?
A federal lawsuit argues that the agency's policy of perusing travelers' personal data without a warrant or probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment.
But the real goal is to speed up removals, despite ongoing due process violations.
The move is bad for free speech and bad for American businesses that depend on tourism.
The Justice Department's litigation positions are at odds with its avowed intent to protect Second Amendment rights.
Rev. Stephen Josoma of St. Susanna Parish defended the message against the Trump administration's immigration enforcement.
Sarah McLaughlin reveals how foreign governments pressure American universities through speech codes and satellite campuses, and examines the broader threat international authoritarianism poses to free expression.
But there's a silver lining—sort of.
Calling suspected cocaine smugglers "combatants" does not justify summarily executing them.
So holds a Fifth Circuit panel, over a dissent. Note that part of the majority's rationale is that the photo would only violate the statute if the prosecution can show that defendant intended to invade privacy in a way "highly offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities."
So far, by the president's reckoning, he has prevented 650,000 U.S. drug deaths—eight times the number recorded last year.
Department of Homeland Security
The party in power changes. The pressure to silence critics doesn’t.
From the "Gitlow v. New York at 100" symposium, held this year at the Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law.
It's not surprising that the NRA and other Second Amendment advocates spoke out against a trans firearm ban floated by the Trump administration.
I wrote it (with help from others) on behalf of the Cato Institute and a group of takings and property scholars.
The prosecutors argue that sentencing based on unconvicted—or even uncharged—conduct doesn't violate due process.
The footage shows what happened to the survivors of the September 2 attack that inaugurated the president's deadly campaign against suspected drug boats.
The document remains remarkably resilient, even as Republicans and Democrats keep launching assaults on liberty.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.