Kimberlin is also known for having accused Dan Quayle of having bought marijuana from him, and has since become a frequent litigant, including against bloggers Patrick Frey (Patterico), Aaron Walker, and others.
A high-profile gun case actually presents meaty questions of administrative law
While the use of force can be justified to curtail the spread of communicable diseases, the threat has to be weighed against the burdens on potential carriers.
“Why should courts, charged with the independent and neutral interpretation of the laws Congress has enacted, defer to such bureaucratic pirouetting?”
It's often very hard to get court filings retroactively sealed.
Plus: South Carolina primary tallies, coronavirus claims two lives in Washington state, and more...
stemming from a dispute about picketing and open carry.
Psychologist Jesus Padilla was forbidden to complete research that could have set many indefinitely committed people free. He died with the work unfinished.
Some panelists at the conservative conference want to give the government more power over social media.
Plus: Who's using Clearview AI?, court rules against Joe Arpaio, and more...
Apparently, conservatives believe in states' rights, except when they don't.
In Facebook: The Inside Story, even Steven Levy’s most generous conclusions about the tech giant are still pretty damning.
A congressional battle erupts over how much to reform the soon-to-expire USA Freedom Act—if they reform it at all.
Government officials keep trying to make us expose our data to them—and the criminals who ride on their coattails.
So the Ninth Circuit correctly (and unsurprisingly) holds in Prager University v. Google.
Trump has long complained that libel laws need to be loosened to allow more lawsuits against media outlets.
The conservative nonprofit Prager University alleged the company should not be allowed to place its videos on "Restricted Mode."
The New York Times technology reporter is revealing how social media is encouraging individual expression.
The justices heard oral arguments this week in United States v. Sineneng-Smith.
The former vice president's accusations require a couple of footnotes.
A couple of posts prompted by an error (since corrected) in an article that cited our brief.
"[T]he parties argued as public figures employed in the areas of law and civil service, their livelihoods are tied to their reputation."
"At a time when hate and bias incidents are on the rise, it is crucial that the state not remove these types of prohibitions that deter or punish this unacceptable behavior."
Under New York's rules, licensed pistol and revolver owners were not allowed to leave home with their handguns unless they were traveling to or from a shooting range.
Nobody is being misled by this obviously joking debate clip. But this sort of ginned-up outrage will be used to target political opponents.
How the press learned to stop worrying and love censorship.
Americans are so locked into their political sides that many of them seem willing to cast aside some of the nation's long-established constitutional protections.
What’s at stake in United States v. Sineneng-Smith.
A clear constitutional violation.
The ruling may well be both correct and consistent with the same court's earlier ruling in favor of a different set of plaintiffs arising from the same events. But the opinion does still have a few notable flaws.
The Institute for Justice calls on the Supreme Court to put a stop to it.
The mob strategy is morally and practically flawed.
The findings shared by Inspector General Michael Horowitz revealed some rotten practices at the FBI and a major media blindspot.
The presidential candidate’s gun control platform, like his defense of "stop and frisk," sacrifices civil liberties on the altar of public safety.
The lawsuit had been filed against the University of Colorado; the Scheduling Order, which the professor had sought to seal, referred to allegations of improper conduct on the professor's part.
Legislators who approved a bunch of other gun control bills could not agree on what features make a firearm intolerable.
Critics say the long-running satiric cartoon has created "a generation of boys" who are smug and disengaged.
In Janus, the Court rejected requirements that government employees pay dues to unions; now the question before the Court is whether this applies to mandatory bar membership (and bar dues).
Government wants to force social media platforms to accept a “duty of care” to protect users from whatever they deem harmful.
The long, strange, and unfinished trip of a sitcom-writing legend who turned right after the Cold War, co-founded a podcast empire, turned on to psychedelics, and got turned off to politics.
Somebody tell the FBI and Congress.
"The district court should not be a party to concealing this information from the public, especially as it concerns an arbitration organization that holds itself out to the public as impartial. These documents would be useful to the public in evaluating the true extent to which the organization is impartial."
In Broward County, judges almost never reject police petitions for gun confiscation orders.
An update on that Connecticut unsealing case.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks