How the Conservative Supreme Court Is Changing America
Leading libertarian legal scholar Randy Barnett talks about abortion, gun rights, and worrying trends at the highest court in the land.
Leading libertarian legal scholar Randy Barnett talks about abortion, gun rights, and worrying trends at the highest court in the land.
Litigating defamation claims "in secrecy to avoid any potential embarrassment to" their subjects "directly contradicts the presumptive right of public access to pleadings and judicial proceedings."
But the Montgomery County residential picketing ordinance, also mentioned in the marshal's letter, is likely fine.
The gun control policies under discussion are fundamentally ill-suited to prevent mass shootings.
The Court told appeals courts to reconsider their conclusions in light of last week's ruling against New York's restrictions on public possession of firearms.
likely unconstitutional, holds a federal district court.
The Reason senior editor and co-founder of the libertarian feminist group Feminists for Liberty examines a murky post-Roe future.
Several state supreme courts already have recognized the right to terminate a pregnancy. Will more states join the list?
Democrats aren't really this short-sighted, are they?
The late standup comedian's FBI file says he "ridiculed the FBI, law enforcement, and high public officials, beyond the bounds of good humor."
El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Poland offer a window into a post-Roe world.
The principle has implications that go far beyond abortion. Some of them deserve far more attention than they have gotten to this point.
A pro-life group's model legislation hints at how extreme enforcing abortion bans could get.
Plus: America's falling murder clearance rate, the Fed wrestles with inflation, and more...
The leading libertarian legal theorist talks about worrying trends at the Supreme Court as a conservative majority takes hold.
Brian Doherty's history of underground comix chronicles how Robert Crumb, Art Spiegelman, and others challenged censorship and increased free speech.
The former president's recklessness is beyond dispute, but that is not enough to convict him while respecting the First Amendment.
Understanding what Justice Alito got wrong in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Alabama's attorney general argues such medical transitioning is not rooted in America’s history and therefore not constitutionally protected.
The FDA could work with the Department of Justice to sue states over mifepristone bans. But should it?
Grappling with surveillance implications of Roe being overturned
National legislation and extraterritorial application of state laws are inconsistent with the local leeway that the Constitution protects.
so the District Court can reconsider it in light of the Supreme Court's new Bruen precedent.
There is demand for child tax credits, paid family leave, and funding for crisis pregnancy centers but the Rubio-Romney plan is not the answer.
Anti-discrimination law was pioneered by the political left. But, in recent years, conservatives have increasingly tried to use it for their own purposes.
California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, or D.C.?
I lost my motion opposing pseudonymity in the District of New Hampshire, though I'm appealing to the First Circuit.
The Sixth Circuit disagrees with the Second Circuit in the @RealDonaldTrump case (but maybe not by much).
The Virginia governor's proposed 15-week ban shows what a moderate approach to abortion looks like.
Plus: stereotypes within libertarianism, and Katherine compares the editors to Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters.
IVF at "significant risk"
A 6–3 majority sees it as noncoercive and not a violation of the Establishment Clause.
The Supreme Court may have overturned Roe v. Wade, but it has not ended legal battles over abortion.
Justice Thomas reiterates his desire to revisit the contours of defamation law and New York Times v. Sullivan.
Plus: What overturning Roe means for Republicans' future, court halts ban of Juul products, and more...
There’s no painless way to restrict choices for people who resist.
Although the chief justice's incrementalism did not sway his colleagues, his observations about the meaning of a "right to choose" could be relevant in state legislatures.
Liberals won't reconcile themselves to Dobbs, any more than conservatives accepted Roe v. Wade and Casey.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks