Secret Surveillance Warrants Remain Secret
In November, the Supreme Court declined to consider an ACLU petition arguing that the public has a First Amendment right to see the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court's classified decisions.
In November, the Supreme Court declined to consider an ACLU petition arguing that the public has a First Amendment right to see the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court's classified decisions.
It all started with a stolen PlayStation 5.
To "get wanted individuals off the streets," police are stopping drivers without any evidence that they have broken the law.
These orders aren’t about safety. They’re a complete rejection of the legitimacy of these procedures, and a denial of individual liberty.
One judge would have held that threats to injure reputation are criminalized by the law, but the other two disagreed.
The case stems from defendant's claims that plaintiff, a comic book writer, said racist things to her at a comic-book-business social function.
There’s no freedom if the state can separate us from our money.
Firearm seizures are ineffective, and gun possession arrests are frequently unjust.
Such laws, which allow redundant prosecutions based on defendants' bigoted beliefs, supposedly are authorized by the amendment that banned slavery.
Will this follow-up to the famous wedding cake case finally decide if this is mandated speech violating the First Amendment?
"You'll have a bunch of people who plead to avoid trial or go broke trying to vindicate their rights."
The plaintiff, Frank Gogol, and the defendant, Malissa White, are both comic book writers.
The government controls on the traditional banking system also apply to custodial cryptocurrency services.
So holds the Eleventh Circuit, as to dieticians, viewing itself as bound by an earlier decision involving interior designers.
Censors wore out their welcome during the 20th century's indecency wars.
on remand, jury must be instructed that it has to determine (among other things) whether the defendant “reasonably believed the conversation was not confidential.”
even though the video includes a brief appearance by a minor (a friend of plaintiff's).
But the claims against Donald J. Trump, Jr. and Rudy Giuliani are dismissed.
Prosecutor says no criminal charges will be filed, because the girls could leave their undergarments on.
The suit deserves to fail for much the same reasons as Trump-era attacks on immigration sanctuaries.
In an age of elite scorn, government mandates, a rotten economy—and powerful, decentralized communication tools—common people are pushing back.
Plus: Elon Musk accuses the SEC of trying to silence him, Elizabeth Warren gets her antitrust wish, and more...
Apparently the rule of law doesn’t matter if Justin Trudeau doesn’t like your peaceful protest.
Kokomo officials agree not to enforce ordinance banning “obscene, indecent, or immoral” signs against flag that says “Fuck Biden and fuck you for voting for him.”
According to a former federal prosecutor, the seemingly redundant case sends "the message that the Justice Department won't tolerate this type of racist hatred."
Plus: An antitrust lawsuit against Juul was dismissed, the EARN IT Act's sponsor has a new proposal, and more...
In the new book Free Speech, the Danish activist defends radical self-expression from Socrates to social media.
Larry Krasner also questions the effectiveness of "supply-side" measures aimed at reducing criminals' access to firearms.
"If this study doesn't put the nail in the coffin of academic training to little children, it's hard to imagine what will," says psychologist Peter Gray.
"The jurors repeatedly assured the Court's law clerk that these notifications had not affected them in any way or played any role whatever in their deliberations."
Plus: Trafficking visas, a new no-fly list?, and more...
"He hath no more law than [a monkey/bull/goose]" vs. slight mischaracterization of legal advice.