Jury Clears Afroman of Defamation for Mocking Cops Who Raided His House
Ohio sheriff's deputies raided Afroman's house in 2022 based on a bogus tip, then sued the rapper after he released music videos mocking the deputies.
Ohio sheriff's deputies raided Afroman's house in 2022 based on a bogus tip, then sued the rapper after he released music videos mocking the deputies.
Government-backed biowearables could generate vast streams of personal health data with few legal safeguards.
Department of Homeland Security
The Oklahoma senator, nominated to replace Kristi Noem, is blasé about the use of deadly force.
“We did this overseas, and it’s come home in every conceivable way.”
Loomer had entered into a non-disparagement agreement to settle an earlier case, and the agreement had been adopted as a court order, but it also had an exception for statements responding to CAIR's statements about her.
"Often, two true statements can be juxtaposed in such a way that they imply an idea that is false, which, under Michigan law, gives rise to a cause of action for defamation."
The First Amendment does not allow the FCC chairman to police news coverage.
Eight others were convicted on vague "terrorism" charges—causing serious concern among First Amendment advocates.
Yes, 6-year-old students have First Amendment rights, the 9th Circuit says.
"[T]he trial court identified only two actions that purportedly constituted 'coercive control': the first was 'coordinating with someone Mia thought was her friend to deliver her' to her parents, and the second was an 'unreasonable level of monitoring a nearly grown woman,' which the trial court stated 'is concerning.'"
The Second Circuit just affirmed lower court decisions so holding.
"Freedom of speech and of press is accorded aliens residing in this country," according to a 1945 Supreme Court ruling.
Plus: The FCC threatens broadcast licenses over war coverage, J.D. Vance positions himself as an Iran war skeptic, and remembering Reason Senior Editor Brian Doherty.
The FCC chairman's reasoning is faulty.
His push relies on dubious data about the pills' safety.
And Middle Eastern dictatorships are helping him do it.
At best, the authorities will show up after the threat has already occurred.
In war, the facts are hard to determine. In Carr’s war against broadcasters, the facts are easier to see.
More than eight decades ago, the Supreme Court invented a vague First Amendment exception that would-be censors continue to invoke.
Germany’s law against Nazi symbolism "is being misused to silence people with dissenting views," Rainer Zitelmann tells Reason.
Her cert petition to the Supreme Court presents the important jurisdictional question of whether the Judicial Disability Act bars all judicial review of a decision by her fellow judges to remove her from active service.
The students allege they weren't involved in the Oct. 11, 2023 Columbia student groups' letter that blamed Israel for the Oct. 7 attacks, and that labeling them ""Columbia's Leading Antisemites" based on that letter was therefore false and defamatory.
Federal officers at Camp East Montana have beaten people for requesting medicine and even placed bets on which detainee would attempt suicide next.
Plus: Donald Trump vs. Thomas Massie, Republicans preparing to kill the filibuster for a very dumb reason, explosions in the Strait of Hormuz, and more...
Unlike the MetroCard, the OMNY system requires train and bus riders in New York City to give their name and phone number to the government.
The ban, which targets guns based on criteria that make little sense, seems vulnerable to a challenge under the Supreme Court's Second Amendment precedents.
Some gun-rights activists are blaming immigrants, but the real culprits are Virginia Democrats.
Bryan Getchius was arrested, jailed, and spent seven months on house arrest before eventually being cleared by official lab results.
Anthropic sues the federal government—and kicks off a debate about free speech for artificial intelligence systems.
Mark Chenoweth discusses the SEC’s gag rule, the power of the administrative state, and the legal battle over whether regulators can silence their critics.
So holds a Ninth Circuit panel, though reinforcing the Ninth Circuit's view that allegedly "derogatory and injurious remarks," including political speech, "directed at students' minority status" can be punished.
After users prompted Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok to generate "vulgar" posts, British officials warned X it could face penalties.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.