In Kentucky, Legal Abortion Is on the Ballot
Voters will soon cast ballots on a constitutional amendment that seeks to explicitly remove any protections for abortion in the state's constitution.
Voters will soon cast ballots on a constitutional amendment that seeks to explicitly remove any protections for abortion in the state's constitution.
Plus: International attitudes about Russia and China, court rules against book publishers merging, and more...
The music industry objects to the use of rap lyrics by prosecutors.
The two fake news organizations want the Supreme Court to review the case of a man who was arrested for making fun of the police.
"While the procedural protections currently in place are grossly inadequate, we may soon be calling these the 'good old days.'"
Plus: Hate speech is free speech, tax gap is stable, and more...
Plus: For Halloween, the editors describe what scares them most about politics and government right now.
In the two cases, brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions argues that race-conscious admissions violate the Civil Rights Act
The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI regularly report misinformation and disinformation to tech companies for potential removal.
A federal judge suggested that plaintiffs can sue as John Does only to the extent that identifying them would also identify nonparties who want to remain anonymous (such as the students who accused the plaintiffs of sexual misconduct).
The agency should be abolished and its employees sent to seek jobs in the private sector.
An interesting echo, I think, of NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware (1982).
[NOTE: There is nothing parodic or facetious about any item in this post; it is entirely accurate. No, seriously, it is. Really, I mean it, really.]
The Institute for Justice argues evidence from warrantless searches can’t be used for zoning enforcement.
Plus: Charlottesville cracks down on city employee speech, judge dismisses "blackout challenge" lawsuit against TikTok, and more...
On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito repeated the common myth that "shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater" is unprotected speech.
[UPDATE: I've added comments from plaintiff's lawyer.]
"Journalism and investigative reporting have long served a critical role in our society. But journalism and investigative reporting do not require illegal conduct."
The facts are complicated, and involve a good deal more than just disagreement as to gender identity; but it seems to me like an important controversy.
A court may impose restrictions on redistribution of material obtained through court-ordered discovery (as opposed to obtained through other means)—though if the depositions are quoted in court filings or played in court, the material used would "become part of the public record, creating a presumption of public access."
The state made it a felony to carry handguns for self-defense in "any place of worship or religious observation."
"The defendants' [reliance] on ... source materials, including an official congressional report, articles in well-known newspapers and magazines, and police reports ... '... alone ... defeat[s] any claim of actual malice.'"
Appellate briefs need to be treated as public documents, and (I argued) shouldn't be "provisionally" sealed for months or years without findings that such sealing (or, more often, redaction) is genuinely necessary.
Fearmongering about mass school shootings leads to some dumb, privacy-threatening ideas.
Prof. Elizabeth Weiss claims SJSU retaliated against her for her speech.
"We ... recognize ... that allowing this case to move forward could embolden abusers ... and could discourage victims and their families from seeking help. But, at the same time, we must acknowledge the potential for false accusations and the right that someone who is falsely accused has to recover for the harm thereby caused."
when the sermons lead to protests? That question is pending in Texas court.
Livestream with Nick Gillespie, Chris Rufo, and Zach Weissmueller's about Rufo's "counterrevolution" against wokeness
UPDATE: But wait! It turns out the decision was overturned on appeal, see below. (I've changed the title to a question; it originally said such a statement was indeed "harassment, intimidation, or bullying," summarizing the initial decision.)
Carry permit applicants would have to prove they are not dangerous, and guns would be banned from myriad locations.
Craig Ridley died after corrections officers paralyzed him in a beating then left him without medical care for days.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.