Restraining Orders Do Not Prove That People Are 'Dangerous'
The Biden administration is defending a federal law that disarms Americans based on "boilerplate language" in orders that judges routinely grant.
The Biden administration is defending a federal law that disarms Americans based on "boilerplate language" in orders that judges routinely grant.
"Defendant Huber intentionally fired his service weapon at Decedent and killed him with gunfire while Decedent posed no threat of death or serious bodily harm to Defendant Huber," the lawsuit states.
The 5th Circuit noted that such orders can be issued without any credible evidence of a threat to others.
New study sees Chicago harassing and arresting people for paperwork violations, damaging their ability to live and work, without demonstrable effect on gun violence
based on their not securing the gun they gave him and other things, given the evidence they had of his mental state.
Defending a categorical ban on gun possession by cannabis consumers, the Biden administration cites inapt "historical analogues."
A new Netflix documentary shows how the seeds of political polarization that roil our culture today were planted at Waco.
The president wants to redefine federally licensed gun dealers in service of an ineffective anti-crime strategy.
Even as the president bemoans the injustice of pot prohibition, his administration insists that cannabis consumers have no right to arms.
It’s a win for self-defense rights in ongoing campaigns to conscript businesses for political causes.
Conservatives have been slow to recognize the threat that drug prohibition poses to gun rights and other civil liberties.
The ruling has significant shortcomings and may be overruled on appeal. The Biden Administration's position in this litigation is wrong for much the same reasons as the Trump Administration was wrong to target immigration sanctuaries.
Judges and prosecutors accused James and Jennifer Crumbley of negligent behavior despite the fact that school officials at the time reached many of the same judgments.
"It's very easy for politicians to legislate freedom away," says Northwood University's Kristin Tokarev. "But it's incredibly hard to get back."
The president and his predecessor both tried to impose gun control by executive fiat.
Politicians lean on the financial industry to target activities they don’t like.
Plus: FBI director says COVID's origins "are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan," Supreme Court justices seem skeptical of student loan forgiveness, and more...
Historian Jeff Guinn's account focuses on the ATF's oft-overlooked fiasco in the 1993 affair rather than the FBI's widely reported involvement.
A New York Times story about the state's location-specific gun bans glosses over the vast territory they cover.
After a tragic on-set accident, a district attorney used a law passed after the incident to threaten Baldwin with years in jail.
The El Paso incident from a few days ago, the FBI 2021 statistics, and more.
The longest-serving California senator was a hardline drug warrior, a surveillance hawk, and no friend of freedom.
Guidance for judicial examination of legal history.
Although the law did not change, regulators suddenly decided to criminalize unregistered possession of braced pistols.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about the Second Amendment, gun control, and mass shootings.
As usual, Biden's gun policy proposals bump up against reality.
The government argued that marijuana users have no Second Amendment rights because they are dangerous, unvirtuous, and untrustworthy.
Judge James Ho concurs, adding "I write separately to point out that our Founders firmly believed in the fundamental role of government in protecting citizens against violence, as well as the individual right to keep and bear arms—and that these two principles are not inconsistent but entirely compatible with one another."
The president seems to have forgotten his concession that such laws leave murderers with plenty of options that are "just as deadly."
The actor is a polarizing figure. That shouldn't matter when evaluating the criminal case against him.
The researchers identified 662 cases involving threats to multiple victims, but they concede that it's likely "there are many more threats than completed events."
So the Florida Supreme Court held today.
The city has not granted a single permit since the Supreme Court upheld the right to bear arms last June.
an argument about post-Bruen gun legislation from Robert Leider.
By banning firearms from a wide range of "sensitive places," the state effectively nullified the right to bear arms.
The law is hard to defend on logical, practical, or constitutional grounds.
Because of a misdemeanor welfare fraud conviction, Bryan Range is no longer allowed to own guns.