Cops Handcuffed, Arrested a Uvalde Mom for Trying To Rescue Her Kids
Why did it take an hour for the police to stop alleged killer Salvador Ramos?
Why did it take an hour for the police to stop alleged killer Salvador Ramos?
Making schools more like prisons would not appreciably decrease violence.
Neither expanded background checks nor a federal "assault weapon" ban can reasonably be expected to have a meaningful impact on such crimes.
Plus: Florida social media law violates First Amendment, against populist antitrust action, and more...
These three gun controls failed in New York, and there is little reason to think they would work elsewhere.
It's not clear which guns she is talking about, and even Collins does not seem to know.
Predicting violence is a lot harder than people claim in retrospect, and a wider net inevitably ensnares more innocent people.
The vast majority do not have disqualifying records, and "universal" requirements are easily evaded.
The problem is not sneaky entrepreneurs who sell accessories; it's legislators who ban guns based on functionally unimportant features.
The paper blames a "gun-buying spree" during the pandemic for the 2020 jump in murders.
Nikki Fried, a Democrat, is suing the Biden administration, arguing that the policy violates the Second Amendment and a congressional spending rider.
The ATF used a lot of words that invite lawsuits and leave industry insiders baffled.
Maybe it shows that the existing restrictions are not working as advertised.
Out of 27,900 research publications on gun laws, only 123 tested their effects rigorously.
The argument for loosening restrictions on armed self-defense goes beyond the measurable impact on public safety.
Plus: Ukraine war developments, Biden's new tax scheme, and more...
Lawful gun owners should not be forced to jump through hoops just to exercise basic constitutional rights
When governments can de-bank you, you are not really free.
Ukrainians have taken to the streets with arms to defend their country and their freedom.
Biden offered a mix of mostly pointless or arguably unconstitutional "solutions" to the misuse of guns by criminals.
Firearm seizures are ineffective, and gun possession arrests are frequently unjust.
The suit deserves to fail for much the same reasons as Trump-era attacks on immigration sanctuaries.
Plus: An antitrust lawsuit against Juul was dismissed, the EARN IT Act's sponsor has a new proposal, and more...
Larry Krasner also questions the effectiveness of "supply-side" measures aimed at reducing criminals' access to firearms.
Already abused for political purposes, the power of government shouldn’t be expanded based on lies.
Politicians deputize the private sector to restrict rights protected from the government.
If you want to own a machine gun, it's probably not going to happen anytime soon—even if you make a decent living and have never committed a crime.
After more than a decade of subversion, the Supreme Court has a chance to rectify this situation.
Judge Lawrence VanDyke included a satirical opinion that his colleagues can use when they decide otherwise.
After sweeping last November's elections, Virginia Republicans look to roll back Democratic gun laws.
It's bad public policy to leap to the conclusion that we do.
The bills call for reforms that would be nearly impossible to implement and will not prevent a repeat of 2020.
The charge requires proof that James and Jennifer Crumbley knew their son posed a threat and could have prevented the attack through "ordinary care."
Gavin Newsom is exploring legislation to authorize private civil actions against people who sell "assault weapons" or gun kits.
The organization's embrace of a wide-ranging progressive agenda undermines its reason for existing.
Despite such magazines being widely and lawfully used, and with the ban having been tossed out by other courts and court panels, the 9th Circuit thinks the ban does not violate the Second Amendment
Eric Adams thinks he can give the police more power to hunt for guns without making innocent minority men the inevitable target.
Restrictions have little chance of moving beyond political theater, or of winning compliance if passed.
The Supreme Court should reject a law that bars ordinary people from carrying guns for self-defense.
The idea that massive government spending, hate speech laws, and gun control will improve America—when they failed horribly elsewhere—is a dangerous myth.
Several groups urging the Supreme Court to overturn New York’s virtual ban on bearing arms emphasize the policy’s racist roots and racially disproportionate impact.
Carrying this archaeologists' accessory in the city's downtown without government permission is now a misdemeanor.
A Supreme Court decision against New York's gun control scheme would be a victory for both criminal justice reform and the Second Amendment.
"Restrictions on guns in public spaces are appropriate to make public spaces safe for democratic participation."
Plus: ACLU rewrites Ruth Bader Ginsburg, theaters sue over NYC vaccine passports, and more...
The agency returns to a research area where it has caused much controversy in the past.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10