Florida School Shooting Resurrects Terrible Plan to Prevent People on the No Fly List from Buying Guns
Senators want to use secret, largely unaccountable government watchlists as a justification for denying some citizens' due process.
Senators want to use secret, largely unaccountable government watchlists as a justification for denying some citizens' due process.
This from a guy who bemoaned the lack of due process just weeks ago.
Since the accessories are legal, Attorney General Jeff Sessions is helping the president rewrite the law.
El Paso Democrat, trying to change Texas from red to blue, talks about guns, weed, and how we've already got "record safety and security on our border"
The policy, which the company wants Congress to impose on the country, is driven by emotion, P.R., and symbolism, not logic.
The justices have passed up one opportunity after another to clarify the boundaries of the constitutional right to arms.
After missing warning signs, law enforcement and others are now quick to say they need more power to stop the next tragedy.
It's more about sending a message to Congress
Forget the debates over laws that can't make a difference; the heat and noise is really all about political tribes attempting to inconvenience each other.
On today's podcast: Mona Charen gets booed, the gun control debate reignites, public sector unions suck, and Olympic curling is surprisingly awesome.
It is doubtful that the proposed rule would have made a difference in mass shootings.
Rick Scott isn't blazing new ground here.
"I gave him a gun. I gave him a badge. I gave him the training. If he didn't have the heart to go in, that's not my responsibility."
In the aftermath of the Parkland shooting.
Unless crafted carefully, the proposal could set up more standoffs between armed citizens and police.
A screening system can be "comprehensive" without being smart, fair, or effective.
He'd also like everyone to trim their hair so it doesn't touch their ears.
The gun-control consensus that is forming should be particularly troubling to "mentally ill" Americans and skeptics of unrestrained police power.
The president showed empathy, engagement, and leadership in a way that will surprise many of his critics and supporters alike.
Are "gun violence restraining orders" the answer?
The benefits and flaws of policy disputes get sidelined when activist movements adopt kids as human shields.
The president may want to act, but he may need Congress to go along.
The once obscure device may not be long for this world.
Since the mid-1990s (and despite mass shootings), popular opinion in favor of gun rights has increased. It's unlikely the Parkland massacre will change that.
Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, Robby Soave and Nick Gillespie talk gun violence, immigration politics, Russian electoral interference, and Black Panther.
"The right to keep and bear arms is apparently this Court's constitutional orphan."
Such orders can easily be used to take away innocent people's Second Amendment rights.
Looking back a few years after hypothetical new restrictions on semiautomatic weapons in private hands, we see a country grown more divided, but no less armed.
Young Americans don't fit into dying 20th-century culture-war tribes.
The Fox News host offers good-faith ideas worth engaging.
There are no plausible options that offer more than the faintest prospect of preventing the next massacre.
Even a narrower approach, focused on purported risk, deprives many innocent people of their constitutional rights.
Policies favored by both experts and the public would not have prevented the Florida shooting.
Congress can't "stop the killing...by changing the law."
Shooting revives deliberately misleading talking points about a bad regulation both the NRA and the ACLU opposed.
California's gun registration program is a mess.
Some pundits want school security to be as pointlessly intrusive as airport security.
His Ghost Gunner and 3D printing are destroying the concept of gun control.
The state's 1,000-foot rule made accidental felons out of people carrying firearms for self-defense.
Just because something looks like a gun doesn't mean it needs to be regulated like one.
Their attempts on the dark web had a less than 25 percent success rate
Given the arbitrariness of federal criteria for gun ownership, the public safety benefits of background checks are dubious.
The bill dramatically liberalizes concealed carry laws nationwide.
Citing state law, Honolulu's police chief tells them to turn in their guns.
The legislation mostly reminds federal agencies to follow the laws already on the books.
In a politically polarized America, gun control is destined to be obeyed primarily by its advocates.
A false sense of security is worse than no sense of security at all.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10