Everybody Wants To Regulate the Internet Except Ajit Pai: Podcast
One year after Net Neutrality, connection speed is up, the discrimination critics feared is non-existent, and the debate about Internet regulation is abysmal.
One year after Net Neutrality, connection speed is up, the discrimination critics feared is non-existent, and the debate about Internet regulation is abysmal.
The university's definition of "harassment" is breathtakingly broad.
The "questionable" "editing choices," the court said, weren't sufficiently injurious to reputation to qualify as libelous (whether or not they conveyed a false message).
Please share it widely -- there will be at least nine more in the upcoming months.
Episode 1 of Free Speech Rules, a new video series by UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh
"[SUNY] Purchase College student Gunnar Hassard was arraigned in Harrison Town Court for Aggravated Harassment in the First Degree, a class E felony, for hanging posters with Nazi symbolism in areas of the campus."
The federal case against the Charlottesville murderer illustrates how hate crime laws punish people for their bigoted beliefs.
"Protection against the possibility of future adverse impact on employment does not overcome the presumption of public access."
A lawsuit argues that the state's elaborate restrictions, ostensibly aimed at preventing underage vaping, violate the right to freedom of speech.
The deputy said he took issue with the word "fuck" in the song despite using it himself moments earlier.
India is known as the land of contradictions, and recent events do little to undermine that reputation.
Also: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez owns the cons while spouting policy B.S.
Plus: Trump changes his mind about military spending and why Rand Paul hates Trump's new attorney general pick.
We've got a grant -- we've finished the first video (under 4 minutes) -- but we need a good title for the whole series.
New rules ban erotic art, talk of shared sexual interests, kink groups, and anything that "encourages sexual encounters between adults."
The statute is "unconstitutionally overbroad," the appeals court says, because it criminalizes "a substantial amount of protected expression."
Research shows a fifth of its users seek out sexual images. But the sharing site is now part of a massive media conglomerate.
Plus: the First Amendment problems with prosecuting Wikileaks and the trans troops ban is dealt another blow.
A creative legal theory, roundly rejected.
Killing Section 230 would only lead web platforms to ban even more speech.
"I had to add a content warning or else."
It is unconstitutional for the government to discriminate against organizations based on their viewpoint.
As Facebook's supposed ideological allies unfriend the social media giant, the tech industry is learning that there are no permanent allegiances in politics.
A federal judge overturns a state ban on telling customers they can bring their own beer or wine.
The snitch crusade is ostensibly about making sure hot women aren't making money off their hotness without giving the government a cut.
Nadine Strossen, Eugene Volokh, and Stephanie Slade discuss freedom of speech, assembly, and religion at Reason's 50th anniversary.
So holds a federal court, concluding that such e-mails with photos of gun crime victims, coupled with statements such as "Thought you should see a few photos of handiwork of the assault rifles you support," were protected by the First Amendment.
Clicking the "wrong" link can get you interrogated by the authorities-and the situation may soon get worse.
Censoring politicians' racist, sexist, and abhorrent behavior on social media does a big favor to racist, sexist, and abhorrent politicians.
Yet under Chinese law, some rapists get only three years behind bars.
The statute in that case was a funding condition on federal money given to universities -- but the Court's decision held that the government could impose the same rule categorically, whether or not the universities got funds.
I'd love to have people's comments this week, since I owe the journal a final draft Saturday the 24th. [UPDATE: Just to be clear, the article aims to provide a coherent framework for understanding the current precedents, not to come up with new rules from scratch.]
What should the culture of free speech, free expression, and ownership look like on our social media platforms?
Plus: the NRA versus New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and CNN versus the White House
The latest in the Brummer v. Wey (TheBlot) litigation, brought by Prof. Christopher Brummer, a former Obama nominee for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
"Any other result would have undermined the free speech and academic freedom rights of all Rutgers faculty members."
Plus: Trump endorses sentencing reform and Bitcoin's value continues to fall.
Social media can shame them and the school can punish them, but the police shouldn't intervene.
... extends to public high school students, holds a federal judge in Wisconsin.
So reports the Times of London, which was the target of the purported order.
An interesting motion for a temporary restraining order, arguing based on the First Amendment, the dormant Commerce Clause, 47 U.S.C. § 230, and more.
The organization's lawsuit against New York's governor survives a motion to dismiss.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.