Andrew Doyle: Free Speech and Why It Matters
The creator of Titania McGrath on cancel culture, government overreach, and younger generations' willingness to censor
The creator of Titania McGrath on cancel culture, government overreach, and younger generations' willingness to censor
Perhaps the ignominious end to Brian Buglio's career will alert thin-skinned cops to the perils of trying to punish people for constitutionally protected speech.
Dentons US LLP sought to “initiate a civil case under seal by filing a petition to confirm an emergency arbitration award.”
Defendants had said Klayman "'could be the single worst lawyer in America,' has 'never actually won a courtroom victory in his life,' and is an 'idiot' and an 'egomaniac,'" and that "Corsi he seemed to mentally be extremely degraded to the point of what I would call dementia."
A future Miranda warning for litigants? "I wish the SDNY pro se clinic had made me aware that many third-party commercial services download court documents ... and publish this information on the internet."
No, says a district court at first; yes, it says six days later. Always good to check the docket for follow-up orders, if you have the time.
can go forward, as a First Amendment retaliation claim, holds a federal judge.
“The Act is so rife with fundamental infirmities that it appears to have been enacted without any regard for the Constitution,” the lawsuit reads.
A Tennessee trial court "enjoined the parties [including a recent candidate for elected office] from making any public comments about each other and from making any 'negative or disrespectful comments' about each other to third parties."
if it's done without adequate investigation, and as a means of retaliating against the teenager's parent.
at least through discovery and until the motion for summary judgment; Netflix’s motion to dismiss has been denied.
I much enjoyed being on this American Constitution Society chapter panel.
Two Illinois legislators meet with a high school principal complaining about an anti-China poster distributed by a student group, which promptly loses its faculty sponsor and has to
Remember, the lawyer’s true superpower is to turn every question into a question about procedure.
by limiting it to exclude people who sincerely believed the material wasn't revenge porn (i.e., the participants had agreed that it be publicly released).
Umbrellas, black clothing, and chanting "all cops are bastards" signal criminal street gang membership, prosecutors said.
Special bonus connections: disbarred lawyers, Tupac Shakur, New York City political figures, and then-not-yet-Attorney-General Michael Mukasey.
The line between commercial decisions and advocacy is not as clear as opponents of anti-Israel boycotts suggest.
The lawsuit stemmed from CNN's coverage of Dershowitz's argument in the first Trump impeachment trial.
Yet "[i]t is particularly troubling to the Court that [the lawyer] appears to have survived this motion more by dumb luck than any concerted effort on his part to comply with either his professional responsibilities or the orders of this Court."
(Lolicon is "A Japanese term derived from the English phrase 'Lolita complex,' lolicon describes a fascination with cartoons of very young-looking girls engaged in varying degrees of erotic behavior.")
But people have as much right to protest vaccination sites as they do to protest factories, stores, or abortion clinics.
So holds a Pennsylvania court, affirming a conviction for fraudulently obtaining money by claims of veteran status.
But modest redactions are permissible.
Though Trump is gone, the desire to bend the internet toward partisan goals is alive and well.
even if the press release accurately summarizes the Complaint; the rule is different in some states, such as California.
We expect British royals to favor muzzling commoners, but too many lawmakers feel the same way.
The surprising move raises concerns about academic freedom.
It's a working model for non-state governance in cyberspace that is vastly preferable to government control of social media.
Targeting “extremists” threatens civil liberties while increasing the stresses that lead to violence.
Released May 10, but just posted on Westlaw.
The defendant had been barred from presenting his defense, as a sanction for his persistent violation of court orders, including one that he had expressly consented to.
Only students support extending the power to penalize speech, raising concerns about what they’re learning in school.
If plaintiff broadly claims that defendant libeled her by "imputing unchastity," she risks having to disclose a lot about her sexual history.
But the "racial ridicule" statute under which this is happening (1) by its terms doesn't cover such speech, and (2) if it did, it would be unconstitutional.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.