Earlier this year, state Rep. Laurel Libby made a post criticizing trans women in women's sports. Her refusal to apologize has cost Libby her right to speak on the House floor and vote on legislation.
A medical dispute over jaundice treatment prompted the state to take custody of Rodney and Temecia Jackson’s daughter for more than three weeks.
A new ACLU lawsuit argues that the government still is not giving alleged gang members the "notice" required by a Supreme Court order.
The memo says "Alien Enemies" aren't subject "to a judicial review of the removal in any court of the United States."
The journalist joins the show to discuss due process, immigration enforcement, and the growing tensions between the courts and the executive branch.
It appears many people are now eager to dispense with due process.
Two of his targets are seeking permanent injunctions against the president's blatantly unconstitutional executive orders.
"We have thousands of people that are ready to go out, and you can't have a trial for all of these people," Trump said.
Plus: A listener asks who was the better president: Trump or Obama?
The feds are rapidly deploying artificial intelligence across spy agencies. What could go wrong?
"This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear," Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson warned.
Just a quarter of respondents said they favored deporting students for "expressing pro-Palestine views."
Harvard's law faculty previously criticized the Obama administration's assault on norms of free speech and due process.
The Windy City has been the target of ICE’s ire since President Donald Trump took office.
Vice President J.D. Vance is only the latest to indicate he sees due process, as guaranteed in the Constitution, as an unnecessary impediment to the administration's goals.
U.S. District Judge James Boasberg says the evidence indicates that the government "willfully disobeyed" his order blocking removal of alleged Venezuelan gang members.
The Supreme Court unanimously rejected that claim, upholding the right to due process in deportation cases.
The Supreme Court ruled they administration must "facilitate" the return of an illegally deported migrant imprisoned in El Salvador at its behest. They have responded by doing virtually nothing to comply.
An immigration judge's decision reinforces the constitutional argument against the law that the secretary of state is invoking.
Without any recorded dissent, the justices rebuke the Trump Administration's cavalier disregard for due process.
This case has crucial implications for the ability of migrants to effectively challenge illegal AEA deportations.
Although the Court lifted an order that temporarily blocked removal of suspected gang members, it unambiguously affirmed their right to judicial review.
Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia was illegally deported and incarcerated in a Salvadoran prison. The Trump administration admits the deportation was illegal, but claims they can't be required to return him.
Like with the Japanese internment during World War II, the current move to deport alleged alien criminals is driven by hysteria.
The Trump administration says it is shameful even to suggest that immigration agents could make such errors.
People are allegedly being classified as gang members for tattoos of crowns, clocks, and soccer logos.
The detention of Tufts graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk illustrates the startling breadth of the authority the secretary of state is invoking.
The Homeland Security secretary's use of El Salvador's largest prison for propaganda is unethical and an endorsement of an autocratic justice system.
Legislators have used the state Constitution to avoid accountability for egregious traffic violations.
The move is an escalation of the White House's attempt to claim an unchallengeable and unreviewable amount of power.
Plus: A listener asks why some American libertarians seem to unquestioningly accept everything Vladimir Putin says.
As a federal judge, Maryanne Trump Barry said the provision is unconstitutionally vague. That's especially problematic when it is used to punish speech.
To justify the immediate deportation of suspected Venezuelan gang members, the president is invoking a rarely used statute that does not seem to apply in this context.
Linda Martin's lawsuit alleges that the agency violated her right to due process when it took her $40,200 and sent her a notice failing to articulate the reason.
We can't be sure, and that's why due process matters.
by "Eugene Volokh, Michael C. Dorf, David Cole, and 15 other scholars."
The people deported are incarcerated in Salvadoran prisons without any due process whatsoever.
A Trump administration official admits that there is little specific evidence tying some deportees to any crime—and argues that the lack of evidence should be taken as proof of criminality.
Plus: Texas midwife arrested for violating abortion ban, JFK files, Gaza bombings, astronauts finally rescued, and more...
A recently filed amicus brief in Fuld v. PLO.
Plus: Democrats' filibuster hypocrisy, Trump bombs Yemen, March Madness, and more...
largely because the compensatory damages were just $1.
If the Consumer Product Safety Commission doesn't have enough data to enact a rule, it shouldn't be making informal recommendations either.
A driver who was acquitted of drunk driving joins a class action lawsuit provoked by a bribery scheme that went undetected for decades.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
