Justice Department Invokes State Secrets Privilege Over Deportation Flights
The move is an escalation of the White House's attempt to claim an unchallengeable and unreviewable amount of power.
The move is an escalation of the White House's attempt to claim an unchallengeable and unreviewable amount of power.
Plus: A listener asks why some American libertarians seem to unquestioningly accept everything Vladimir Putin says.
As a federal judge, Maryanne Trump Barry said the provision is unconstitutionally vague. That's especially problematic when it is used to punish speech.
To justify the immediate deportation of suspected Venezuelan gang members, the president is invoking a rarely used statute that does not seem to apply in this context.
Linda Martin's lawsuit alleges that the agency violated her right to due process when it took her $40,200 and sent her a notice failing to articulate the reason.
We can't be sure, and that's why due process matters.
by "Eugene Volokh, Michael C. Dorf, David Cole, and 15 other scholars."
The people deported are incarcerated in Salvadoran prisons without any due process whatsoever.
A Trump administration official admits that there is little specific evidence tying some deportees to any crime—and argues that the lack of evidence should be taken as proof of criminality.
Plus: Texas midwife arrested for violating abortion ban, JFK files, Gaza bombings, astronauts finally rescued, and more...
A recently filed amicus brief in Fuld v. PLO.
Plus: Democrats' filibuster hypocrisy, Trump bombs Yemen, March Madness, and more...
largely because the compensatory damages were just $1.
If the Consumer Product Safety Commission doesn't have enough data to enact a rule, it shouldn't be making informal recommendations either.
A driver who was acquitted of drunk driving joins a class action lawsuit provoked by a bribery scheme that went undetected for decades.
How can government agencies better safeguard procedural due process rights?
How does AI challenge basic procedural due process protections and what should be done?
How should we weight the costs and benefits when we conduct due process balancing?
Do we agree with Blackstone that it is better that ten guilty persons escape than one innocent suffer?
The Supreme Court's recent civil forfeiture ruling and why due process matters today.
The Sixth Circuit finds a city failed to provide adequate process before demolishing a condemned mobile home.
Riley's murder was an atrocity. But the law bearing her name is a grab bag of authoritarian policies that have little to do with her death.
The Cato Institute is urging the Supreme Court to take up the case and reaffirm that the liability shield does not apply to "obvious rights violations."
Despite some notable wins, the president-elect's overall track record shows he cannot count on a conservative Supreme Court to side with him.
David McKnight and Julian Alcala were accused of separate plots to steal sexually explicit photos from women's phones during traffic stops.
A new "inactivity reboot" protects data from thieves and helps preserve due process.
Plus: Andrew Cuomo's potential prosecution, Texas death blamed on abortion ban, and more...
The outrageous seizure at the center of Rebel Ridge resembles real-life cash grabs.
Most states collect DNA from felony arrestees pretrial. They should need a warrant to do so.
María Oropeza's arrest during a livestream highlights the dangers faced by opposition leaders in Venezuela and the regime's relentless efforts to silence dissent.
Judge Kenneth King is facing a lawsuit for punishing a 15-year-old who visited his courtroom with his "own version of Scared Straight.''
By targeting "persons undermining peace, security, and stability," the plaintiffs argue, the president is threatening to punish people for opposing a two-state solution.
South Carolina's Operation Rolling Thunder targets cash and contraband but harasses guilty and innocent travelers alike.
An uneven playing field allows the aggressive tactics and legal loopholes that turn traffic stops into cash grabs.
Routine searches of commercial buses violate privacy, target low-income passengers, and result in widespread violations.
In a new book, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch describes the "human toll" of proliferating criminal penalties.
No arrest necessary as South Carolina police hunt for cash
A 21-month legal battle unveils the dark side of South Carolina's annual traffic crackdown.
According to disciplinary charges against Jennifer Kerkhoff Muyskens, she suppressed video evidence that would have helped DisruptJ20 defendants.
Gershkovich was released Thursday in an elaborate prisoner swap involving two dozen prisoners from at least six countries.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says these cases will "devastate" the regulatory state. Good.
The Court says Chevron deference allows bureaucrats to usurp a judicial function, creating "an eternal fog of uncertainty" about what the law allows or requires.
The decision rejects a system in which the agency imposes civil penalties after investigating people and validating its own allegations.
Paul Erlinger was sentenced to 15 years in prison based largely on a determination made by a judge—not a jury.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10