Pervasive Police Corruption in Albuquerque Explains Why a Teetotaler Was Arrested for DWI
A driver who was acquitted of drunk driving joins a class action lawsuit provoked by a bribery scheme that went undetected for decades.
A driver who was acquitted of drunk driving joins a class action lawsuit provoked by a bribery scheme that went undetected for decades.
How can government agencies better safeguard procedural due process rights?
How does AI challenge basic procedural due process protections and what should be done?
How should we weight the costs and benefits when we conduct due process balancing?
Do we agree with Blackstone that it is better that ten guilty persons escape than one innocent suffer?
The Supreme Court's recent civil forfeiture ruling and why due process matters today.
The Sixth Circuit finds a city failed to provide adequate process before demolishing a condemned mobile home.
Riley's murder was an atrocity. But the law bearing her name is a grab bag of authoritarian policies that have little to do with her death.
The Cato Institute is urging the Supreme Court to take up the case and reaffirm that the liability shield does not apply to "obvious rights violations."
Despite some notable wins, the president-elect's overall track record shows he cannot count on a conservative Supreme Court to side with him.
David McKnight and Julian Alcala were accused of separate plots to steal sexually explicit photos from women's phones during traffic stops.
A new "inactivity reboot" protects data from thieves and helps preserve due process.
Plus: Andrew Cuomo's potential prosecution, Texas death blamed on abortion ban, and more...
The outrageous seizure at the center of Rebel Ridge resembles real-life cash grabs.
Most states collect DNA from felony arrestees pretrial. They should need a warrant to do so.
María Oropeza's arrest during a livestream highlights the dangers faced by opposition leaders in Venezuela and the regime's relentless efforts to silence dissent.
Judge Kenneth King is facing a lawsuit for punishing a 15-year-old who visited his courtroom with his "own version of Scared Straight.''
By targeting "persons undermining peace, security, and stability," the plaintiffs argue, the president is threatening to punish people for opposing a two-state solution.
South Carolina's Operation Rolling Thunder targets cash and contraband but harasses guilty and innocent travelers alike.
An uneven playing field allows the aggressive tactics and legal loopholes that turn traffic stops into cash grabs.
Routine searches of commercial buses violate privacy, target low-income passengers, and result in widespread violations.
In a new book, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch describes the "human toll" of proliferating criminal penalties.
No arrest necessary as South Carolina police hunt for cash
A 21-month legal battle unveils the dark side of South Carolina's annual traffic crackdown.
According to disciplinary charges against Jennifer Kerkhoff Muyskens, she suppressed video evidence that would have helped DisruptJ20 defendants.
Gershkovich was released Thursday in an elaborate prisoner swap involving two dozen prisoners from at least six countries.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says these cases will "devastate" the regulatory state. Good.
The Court says Chevron deference allows bureaucrats to usurp a judicial function, creating "an eternal fog of uncertainty" about what the law allows or requires.
The decision rejects a system in which the agency imposes civil penalties after investigating people and validating its own allegations.
Paul Erlinger was sentenced to 15 years in prison based largely on a determination made by a judge—not a jury.
The Court says "a credible threat" justifies a ban on gun possession but does not address situations where there is no such judicial finding.
The Cato Institute's Ian Vasquez recently organized a conference in Argentina featuring President Javier Milei. He gives an update on the presidency.
The decision clears the way for a jury to consider Megan and Adam McMurry's constitutional claims against the officers who snatched their daughter.
The case hinged on the ATF’s statutory authority, not the Second Amendment.
Six justices agreed that federal regulators had misconstrued the statutory definition of a machine gun.
The lack of a clear rationale for charging Trump with 34 felonies raises a due process issue that is likely to figure in his appeals.
Detectives in Fontana, California, told Thomas Perez Jr. that his father was dead and that he killed him. Neither was true.
Prosecutor Ralph Petty was also employed as a law clerk—by the same judges he argued before.
The cars of two Alabama women were seized for more than a year before courts found they were innocent owners. The Supreme Court says they had no constitutional right to a preliminary hearing.
School officials falsely accused the boys of posing for a photo in blackface.
Congress is "silencing the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate," the company argues.
A new report argues that the notorious program squanders taxpayer money while keeping people imprisoned without justification or recourse.
One man’s overgrown yard became a six-year struggle against overzealous code enforcement.
The new rules allow students to be found guilty of assaulting a classmate without ever seeing the full evidence against them.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10