Without Roe v. Wade, Litigants Look to State Constitutions for Protection of Abortion Rights
Several state supreme courts already have recognized the right to terminate a pregnancy. Will more states join the list?
Several state supreme courts already have recognized the right to terminate a pregnancy. Will more states join the list?
Democrats aren't really this short-sighted, are they?
El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Poland offer a window into a post-Roe world.
The principle has implications that go far beyond abortion. Some of them deserve far more attention than they have gotten to this point.
A pro-life group's model legislation hints at how extreme enforcing abortion bans could get.
The leading libertarian legal theorist talks about worrying trends at the Supreme Court as a conservative majority takes hold.
Understanding what Justice Alito got wrong in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Alabama's attorney general argues such medical transitioning is not rooted in America’s history and therefore not constitutionally protected.
The FDA could work with the Department of Justice to sue states over mifepristone bans. But should it?
Grappling with surveillance implications of Roe being overturned
National legislation and extraterritorial application of state laws are inconsistent with the local leeway that the Constitution protects.
There is demand for child tax credits, paid family leave, and funding for crisis pregnancy centers but the Rubio-Romney plan is not the answer.
The Virginia governor's proposed 15-week ban shows what a moderate approach to abortion looks like.
Plus: stereotypes within libertarianism, and Katherine compares the editors to Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters.
IVF at "significant risk"
The Supreme Court may have overturned Roe v. Wade, but it has not ended legal battles over abortion.
Plus: What overturning Roe means for Republicans' future, court halts ban of Juul products, and more...
There’s no painless way to restrict choices for people who resist.
Although the chief justice's incrementalism did not sway his colleagues, his observations about the meaning of a "right to choose" could be relevant in state legislatures.
Liberals won't reconcile themselves to Dobbs, any more than conservatives accepted Roe v. Wade and Casey.
In his Dobbs concurrence, the senior associate justice reiterates his outlying views on precedent and his belief that all substantive due process decisions were "demonstrably erroneous."
Both majority and dissenting opinions include extensive discussions of stare decisis. But the truth is whether you think Roe v. Wade should have been preserved on that basis is heavily correlated with whether you think it was wrong in the first place.
If life begins at conception, there are virtually no limits on government surveillance of women in a post-Roe world.
A weird, messy protest reflects a weird, messy future.
The conservative majority's commitments on contraception, sexual intimacy, and same-sex marriage
The other justices declined to join him, but the future of the Supreme Court rulings on those matters remains unclear.
This makes it likely, though not certain, that the Supreme Court will strike down such laws if states enact them.
The complaining student alleged the students' remarks were "harassing and threatening" him because of his conservative "political affiliation" and his "religious beliefs."
He also nixes the idea that states could "retroactively impose liability or punishment for an abortion that occurred before today's decision takes effect."
The Constitution protects many more rights than it mentions, as James Madison explained.
Most states are unlikely to enact bans, but 22 either have them already or probably will soon.
Looking back at how abortion advertising bans played out last century may give us some idea what the future holds for speech about abortion.
The Supreme Court justice is wrong when he says abortion rights aren't deeply rooted in American history.
Plus: Americans' changing opinions of January 6 riots, Texas craft brewer can "party on," and more...
Plus: The editors unveil their wish list for a hypothetical Libertarian president.
Plus: Uvalde cops didn't check classroom door, Texas GOP slides further to the right, telemedicine deregulation in peril, and more...
The Court doesn't decide whether that means they are subject to an "undue burden" test (as under Planned Parenthood v. Casey) or whether there is no right to abortion under the state constitution.
Some fans are now souring on her legacy.
Big rulings are coming soon on school choice, guns, and abortion.
The Biden Administration is apparently considering a range of responses should te Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade.
Tensions won’t simmer down until Americans stop fearing power in the hands of enemies.
Plus: Michigan prisons ban Spanish and Swahili dictionaries, a win against New York's ban on "unauthorized" legal advice, and more...
Questions about the scope of federal power will remain.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10