Monday Open Thread
What's on your mind?
Narrow decision leaves ATF regulation in limbo.
The detention of Tufts graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk illustrates the startling breadth of the authority the secretary of state is invoking.
If true, then these tariffs would be the biggest peacetime tax increase in American history.
Remarks delivered at the Texas A&M Journal of Law & Civil Governance Banquet
The ballot proposition would effectively require health insurers to cover all treatments at any price.
For an administration that likes to show off successful assassinations, the Trump team has been surprisingly tight-lipped about the Houthi commanders they targeted.
A new meta-analysis finds “no significant effects of social media abstinence interventions on positive affect, negative affect, or life satisfaction.”
The escalating dispute threatens Mexican farmers—and American consumers.
Donald Trump is determined to make everything from Canadian whiskey to Mexican avocados more expensive. Can anyone stop him?
Evan Bernick's first in a series of guest-blogging post: Part I of a critique of an important defense of the constitutionality of Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
Bernick is a leading academic expert on the Fourteenth Amendment.
which likely helped bring the current administration into power."
In its deferred prosecution agreement, Boeing stipulated to an agreed statement of facts demonstrating that it is guilty.
Canada long relied on the U.S. for protection. Now it needs to rediscover self-reliance.
Challenging the common knowledge of urban planning
A lawsuit brought by universities could potentially be much more effective than leaving individual students to fend for themselves.
Dueling letters from 90+ members of the HLS faculty and Adrian Vermeule
A leading expert on habeas corpus explains why the Trump Administration is wrong to claim the case must be heard in Texas, rather than Washington, DC.
The Justices have had plenty of time to think about how to resolve Humphrey's Executor and should not punt.
The Trump administration detains individuals in Texas and Louisiana, yet federal courts on the Amtrak Corridor continue to exercise jurisdiction.
Georgetown law Prof. Jennifer Hillman explains why Trump's tariffs are vulnerable to challenge on this basis.
Paul Clement and Erin Murphy brilliantly defend what shouldn't need defending, but does
An economist explores how a stable and relatively just legal order emerged in medieval Japan.
Facsimile fun, federal funding freezes, and fateful photos.
"We're looking every day for these lunatics that are tearing things up," Rubio said in a Thursday press conference.
An important new article explains why the Supreme Court's precedents denying many constitutional rights to residents of America's overseas territories are wrong.
A new Justice Department rule could help "prohibited persons" who pose no threat to public safety.
It's a lawyer's argument, not an attempt at objective analysis. But I think that on balance it is generally quite correct, and powerfully framed.
The panelists included M. Nolan Gray, Jennifer Hernandez, and myself.
When the government picks energy winners, consumers lose.
and then lied to parents about what was happening." Because some claims remain undecided in trial court, the court of appeals holds it lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.
Two months after he was inaugurated, Trump has smashed many of the government's silly DEI rules. But he hasn't created a new age of meritocracy.
Plus: New York state cut off from federal funding, Phil Magness on tariffs for JAQ, and more...
between White women and Black men are the subject of heightened prejudice and violent responses that create a tangible risk of retaliation and animus against him."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks