Former Houston Drug Cop Convicted of Murder After His Lies Resulted in Two Deaths
The jury accepted the prosecution's argument that Dennis Tuttle and Rhogena Nicholas died because of Gerald Goines' fraudulent search warrant affidavit.

A jury on Wednesday convicted former Houston narcotics officer Gerald Goines of two murder charges for instigating a January 2019 drug raid that killed a middle-aged couple, Dennis Tuttle and Rhogena Nicholas, he falsely accused of selling heroin. Goines admitted that he lied in the affidavit supporting the no-knock search warrant that authorized him and his colleagues to break into the couple's home, describing a heroin purchase that never happened.
The prosecution argued that Goines' lies made him criminally responsible for the deaths of Tuttle and Nicholas, who were killed after Goines and several other officers broke down the front door and immediately shot the couple's dog. Tuttle, who according to prosecutors was napping in a bedroom at the time, reacted to the tumult and gunfire by grabbing a revolver and shooting at the intruders, injuring four of them, including Goines. The cops responded with a hail of at least 40 bullets, killing Tuttle and Nicholas, who was unarmed but allegedly looked like she was about to grab a gun from an injured officer.
The two murder charges against Goines were based on a statute that applies when someone "commits or attempts to commit a felony" and "in the course of and in furtherance of the commission or attempt…commits or attempts to commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual." That charge was inappropriate in this case, the defense argued, because Goines' underlying felony—producing the fraudulent search warrant affidavit—did not cause the deaths of Tuttle and Nicholas, which they brought on themselves.
"This case is overcharged," defense attorney Mac Secrest told the jury during closing arguments on Tuesday. "It should never have been charged [as] felony murder," he said while pointing at the prosecutors. "It got amped up to it because of the politics in their office, because of the media outcry, the pressure."
Goines' lawyers argued that Tuttle and Nicholas would still be alive if they had surrendered instead of resisting. While the prosecution emphasized that the cops fired first, Secrest emphasized that Tuttle fired "the first shot at a human being" (as opposed to the dog). "These officers didn't fire upon anyone until they were fired upon themselves," he said. "Nobody shot at Dennis Tuttle until he started putting bullets into peoples' faces and necks."
Although the officers were not wearing uniforms, Goines' lawyers argued that the word police on their tactical gear should have made it clear who they were. The defense also claimed the cops verbally identified themselves as police officers, although the existing audio record does not reflect that.
According to the account that Art Acevedo, then Houston's police chief, gave at a press conference the night of the raid, the cops "announced themselves as Houston police officers while simultaneously breaching the front door." Within seconds, they had killed the dog. It would be undestandable if Nicholas and Tuttle missed any announcement amid the violence and confusion—a possibility that Jeff Wolf, a Texas ranger who investigated the incident, noted during his testimony.
"Mr. Tuttle reacted as anybody would, any normal person, hearing guns ring out in their house, their doors blown in, his wife on the couch, the dog is dead in the living room," Harris County Assistant District Attorney Keaton Forcht said during his opening statement two weeks ago. "He grabs his pistol and comes storming out." Forcht argued that Goines therefore was "legally responsible for every shot in that house, whether it was from officers or Dennis Tuttle."
Forcht reiterated that point during his closing argument. "Everything that happened in that house, everything, flowed directly from that warrant," he said. Because of Goines' dishonesty, he argued, "those two individuals are now dead."
After deliberating for about eight hours on Tuesday and Wednesday, the jurors accepted that framing, rejecting the defense's claim that Goines' victims were the real aggressors. The jury is scheduled to return on Thurday morning to consider the appropriate penalty.
The murder charges are punishable by five years to life in prison. The jury also convicted Goines of tampering with a governmental record, a felony punishable by two to 10 years in prison.
Goines targeted Tuttle and Nicholas based on 911 calls from a neighbor, Patricia Garcia, who described them as armed and dangerous drug dealers who had sold her daughter heroin. Garcia, who did not even have a daughter, later admitted she had made the whole thing up, pleading guilty to federal charges related to her false reports.
In his search warrant affidavit, Goines claimed a confidential informant had bought heroin from a man at 7815 Harding Street, where Tuttle and Nicholas had lived for two decades. Goines later confessed he had invented that transaction, although he claimed he personally had bought heroin at the house the evening before the raid. Prosecutors showed that was not true either, presenting evidence that Goines was 20 miles away from the house at the time of the alleged drug purchase and had not visited the location that day.
Goines also faces seemingly redundant federal charges in connection with the Harding Street raid. "While acting under color of law," according to a November 2019 indictment, Goines "prepared an affidavit for a search warrant that contained numerous material false statements, presented that affidavit to a State of Texas judicial officer, swore under oath to the truthfulness of the contents of that affidavit, obtained a search warrant based on that affidavit from that judicial officer," and "executed that search warrant."
In doing so, the indictment says, Goines "willfully depriv[ed] Dennis Tuttle of the right, secured and protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States, for people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures." That offense "involved the use, attempted use and threatened use of a dangerous weapon" and "resulted in the death of Dennis Tuttle and Rhogena Nicholas."
In addition to the criminal charges, Goines faces federal civil rights lawsuits filed by relatives of Tuttle and Nicholas. One of those lawsuits also names Acevedo as a defendant.
Goines' lies in this case were part of what Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg described as a "pattern of deceit" going back more than a decade. The Harding Street raid prompted Ogg's office to re-examine some 1,400 drug cases involving Goines, a 34-year veteran who had a habit of framing suspects by inventing drug purchases. "The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has overturned at least 22 convictions linked to Goines," the Associated Press reports.
Acevedo, who initially hailed Goines as a "hero," has insisted that the Harding Street raid did not reflect "a systemic problem with the Houston Police Department." But Ogg saw things differently. "Houston Police narcotics officers falsified documentation about drug payments to confidential informants with the support of supervisors," she said in July 2020. "Goines and others could never have preyed on our community the way they did without the participation of their supervisors; every check and balance in place to stop this type of behavior was circumvented."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Excellent news.
Don't celebrate until he's sentenced.
Absolutely. None of this means shit until he has been court ordered into our counseling group although in all honesty that look in his eyes almost makes me want to shit myself.
Not even then. Presumably, that toad Abbott will pardon him as soon as he can get his flunkies in the Board of Pardons and Paroles to assemble and make their 'recommendation'.
Excellent.
Did they ever recover the 6 shot revolver that Mr. [Dirty Harry] Tuttle allegedly used to wound 5 cops before getting blasted?
I still think that somewhere between most and all of those guys were hit with friendly fire.
Jacob still isn't curious about that. This is his 3rd cut and paste article that regurgitates the the state's story verbatim. What evidence there is suggests that Tuttle didn't shoot anybody. Tuttle was in very rough shape with a leg in a brace and a bandaged hand but he suddenly turned into Kyle Rittenhouse and it took 40 bullets to take him down. The cops shot everybody but aside from Goines nobody is being prosecuted for that.
Sullum is still trying to solve the ambush murder of Trayvon "Skittles" Martin by that white Hispanic-Nazi, George "Kikey" Zimmerman
Jorge Zimmerman
If I understand correctly one of the cops was even firing blindly from outside the house from the area of the front porch apparently hitting the unarmed spouse.
That's my understanding also, and not unprecedented - the only cop who got in any serious legal trouble for the Breanna Taylor shooting was the Barney Fife wannabe who just closed his eyes and did a mag dump into the general area - shooting into neighboring apartments.
My best guess here is that these totally upstanding and respectable narc squad cops, who are very honest and not at all corrupt, would never carry a 'burner' gun they could place in a crime scene if they needed to justify their actions. Maybe I've watched too many movies.
From what I remember of the original coverage in Reason in 2019, there was mention of the revolver being at the scene, but there was no sign of the automatic which was described in detail by the alleged "witness" statement that was used to get the warrant.
I think that cop raided the evidence locker before that photo was taken.
There is no adequate punishment for this crime, but if it were up to me, he'd get life in solitary confinement on bread and water, incommunicado, and not see another human face or sunlight for the rest of his life.
After a minimum of 20 years, I'd give him the option of making the most sincere apology of all by committing hara-kiri.
-jcr
-jcr
You’re far too kind. I’d put him with the regular inmates.
Aryan Nation lifers w/ no possibility of parole.
I agree. And put the white cops with the black Muslims.
What does the Arian Foster fan club have to do with this?
Since he was in the Narcotics unit, MS-13 and the other cartel affiliated gangs wouldn't exactly be looking to go easy on him either.
Tuttle. Freelance heating engineer.
You actually approve of terrorists running around fixing peoples HVAC?
Have you got a Form 27B/6?
I stand corrected.
To be honest I was impressed that awoken from a nap handicapped Tuttle was able to nail four cops with his revolver. Not trying to encourage such a thing but damn, impressive.
Yes, it would have been impressive if it had actually happened. I read two news television accounts, three newspaper accounts and Reason and NONE of them bothered to mention why everyone seems to be accepting this unsupported narrative, none of them mentioned the forensics and ballistics that prove Tuttle did NOT fire the revolver he was supposed to have grabbed from the bedside stand or even mentioned the revolver produced into evidence in a murder trial. This is either lazy reporting or lying.
I imagine that the conversation among the cops was...
Cop A - "Did you bring the throw-down revolver?"
Cop B - "I thought you were supposed to."
Cop A - "Well, we'll just say it was here and got lost somehow."
Cop B - "Yeah. That'll work."
Even the surviving family members said he kept a revolver in the bedside table. Either he grabbed it on his way out of the bedroom or the cops "disappeared" it. Two shots were fired into a wall a half hour after Tuttle was dead. They were either fired from his pistol to make it look like the pistol had been fired before someone realized that wouldn't work or for unknown reasons from one of the cop guns. Either way the evidence was stonewalled by the cops for over five years as part of the coverup and the pistol was not listed in the inventory of evidence collected at the scene and was either not mentioned as part of this trial or the so-called "reporters" failed to mention it in their "reports."
Wouldn't the gun mainly be evidence in a trial of Tuttle, since nobody else was alleged in court to have fired it?
Since Tuttle was killed in the raid as well as his wife and his dog, there'd be no real ability (or reason) to try him for any crime, either real or fabricated. In the event of a conviction, what would the sentence possibly be?
You're missing the point. The ABSENCE of the gun is evidence that the shooting of Tuttle was unjustified.
I really would appreciate it if Jacob could inform us as to the story on Tuttle’s handgun.
He can't. He's simply repeating the official but long ago discredited official narrative.
I really would appreciate it if Jacob would give up writing and get an honest job.
He's a good writer, just not a very good investigative reporter.
Jakey jakey news is fakey does a really terrible job of explaining this.
It’s because he’s trying to sensationalize the ACAB angle instead of looking at the real story.
So this is a felony murder conviction. Fakey Jakey goes on and on and on and on about the shooting, when the actual story is the fabricated warrants. We knew he was going to be guilty of that. Whether the jury was going to make the “but for” jump from the false warrant to the deaths – well, like I said in days/weeks past, I didn’t think a Texas jury would go for it.
From the prosecution: “But for Gerald Goines, would any of this have happened? And the answer is no.”
And that’s the game.
Harris County Commissioner Ellis, on the other hand, probably needs to be clubbed over the head. “This isn’t just about bad apples—it’s about an unjust system.”
If it was an unjust system, it wouldn’t have had this result you stupid Marxist clod.
Also – let’s all take a moment to consider the one good thing that came out of all this malfeasance and tragedy: if nothing else, at least a pit bull is dead. We can all celebrate and rejoice in that.
Tha ACTUAL story is that a no knock warrant resulted in 40 bullets being fired, two dead people and a dog, and this alleged revolver that Tuttle used still cannot be produced.
All cops are not bad cops, but many, many, many of them are, and it is only getting worse.
Forest here......AT over there.
Keep up the sadistic dog slaughter cheerleadering, though.
As long as bad cops are tolerated, there are no good cops.
Pretty soon, you're only going to have bad cops - because BLM/ACAB efforts, and their full-throated support from politicians/media (including police brass), are making it painfully clear that the beat cops and gumshoes are going to be left hung out to dry - meaning that cops, especially blue city cops, are retiring, relocating, or otherwise fleeing the hottest crime spots in America.
And we've seen how this happens throughout history - even recent history. Like, Venezuela (yea, it's more military than police - but they're kinda the same thing down there). Maduro is obviously one of the most corrupt politicians on the planet - but the cops/military that protect him? They know which side their bread is buttered on. All the good cops fled, and the only thing left are bad cops 100% willing to support a tyrant in exchange for a secured (so long as they're obedient) livelihood.
It's why we should really be rounding up all the BLM/ACAB types and throwing the book at them for whatever crimes we can make them for before the cities they're destroying fall completely. Vandalism? Yea, give them that full year in prison. AND the fines when they get out. Maximum sentence, no mercy from the Courts. Bankrupt them and, if possible, throw them in jail for as long as we can.
Good cops won't work for a corrupt society. If you want to get rid of bad cops, you're first going to have to do something about bad citizens.
It's not sadistic dog slaughter cheerleading, Bi. I love dogs, and loathe any cruelty to them.
Just not pit bulls. Because they are brain-broken genetically-hardwired killing machines. I've already given you the human stats, let's take a look at the rest of them:
• Of those 3,625 individual dogs who killed other animals, 2,918––81%––were pit bulls.
• Of dogs who killed other dogs, 90% were pit bulls.
• Of dogs who injured other dogs but did not kill them in reported cases, 83% were pit bulls.
• Of dogs who killed cats, 86% were pit bulls.
• Of dogs who killed other pets and/or livestock animals, 77% were pit bulls.
https://www.animals24-7.org/2023/01/04/10-year-totals-pit-bulls-kill-81-of-pets-livestock-animals-killed-by-dogs/
There is something very wrong with that breed. And with the people who defend them. Especially in the face of such overwhelming evidence of their violent and aggressive predisposition.
So we still have only the dirty cops' stories that Tuttle fired at them with a revolver and the Prosecutor's assertion that he did so and NONE of the reporters' accounts I have read so far of the testimony or the evidence actually presented in court to the jury supports ANY of that! Is it just lazy reporting? Is even Reason accepting the words of an incompetent and corrupt Police Chief, a big city prosecutor, a lying defense attorney and indicted drug warriors without even mentioning the evidence actually admitted into the trial? Do I have to drop yet another unreliable news source and rely solely on Babylon Bee for my news now?
Babylon Bee understates what's going on.
Still waiting on that shooting report for the incident.
The defense also claimed the cops verbally identified themselves as police officers, although the existing audio record does not reflect that.
Anyone can claim to be a police officer from the other side of a door.
If Tuttle’s revolver is missing, there can be no ballistics testing, and thus no actual evidence that he fired a shot, let alone that he shot any cop rather than them shooting each other – which one might expect given the lack of professionalism this police department has shown otherwise.
And no, their testimony is not evidence I can believe. I doubt I would believe anyone who claimed to have seen just what happened in that chaotic situation (they created), but given the record of lying and covering up other cops' lies in this department, and how much they needed to come up with a story to save their skins, I would not believe _these_ cops even if they were telling a believable story.