2021 Was Another Disappointing Year for Immigration Policy
Joe Biden promised to do better by migrants upon taking office, but he fell short in 2021.

When President Joe Biden took office in January 2021, he inherited a country rattled by a deadly pandemic, a struggling economy, and a bevy of immigration restrictions that his predecessor had imposed to nominally tackle both.
Faced with an opportunity to hit reset on President Donald Trump's controversial approach to immigration, Biden instead kept many of those policies in place and imposed new ones that were hardly more sensible than Trump's. Now, 2021 is ending much the way it started, with the president mistakenly setting his sights on migrants as major COVID-19 vectors and hobbling legal immigration in the name of public health.
Before taking office, Biden frequently spoke about the need to restore asylum and protect migrants "fleeing persecution and violence." He promised to end a key Trump administration policy called the Migrant Protection Protocols—known informally as "Remain in Mexico"—on his first day as president. The policy saw 70,000 asylum seekers relegated to dangerous conditions across the border as they awaited their U.S. immigration court hearings. Asylum, Biden's campaign website said, is a "legal right" designed to "protect people fleeing persecution and who cannot return home safely." On paper, his plans sounded promising (never mind the fact that Biden didn't formally end Remain in Mexico until June).
However, over the past year, the Biden administration has constantly justified its continuation of a different Trump-era border policy: Title 42, which allows Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) to expel migrants on public health grounds. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials saw no valid health reason to shut out asylum seekers, according to the Associated Press. But then–Vice President Mike Pence ordered them to issue an order regardless, launching a policy a former Pence aide described as a "Stephen Miller special," referring to the Trump adviser behind the administration's cruelest immigration policies.
The Biden administration, so committed to "following the science" and treating migrants humanely, has wrongly kept Title 42 in place. Though it relaxed certain aspects of Trump's implementation, allowing most unaccompanied minors and parents and their children to request asylum, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has said that "Title 42 is not an immigration authority, but a public health authority" designed to protect "the American public" and "the migrants themselves." The Biden administration has leaned into that justification, even fighting a September court order to stop using the policy.
In 2021, CBP expelled over 1 million people under Title 42. And since Biden took office on January 20, over 7,000 migrants have been kidnapped and attacked by cartels and Mexican authorities following their deportations. That danger to deportees will undoubtedly continue, with no end to Title 42 in sight and a federal judge ordering that the administration reimplement Remain in Mexico.
As vaccination rates rose and disease risk fell, the administration began to concede that some cross-border movement was acceptable. On November 8, the Biden administration reopened land borders with Canada and Mexico, allowing fully vaccinated travelers to cross. It was a welcome change for separated families, long-absent tourists, and border communities struggling without their typical two nations' worth of potential customers. The same day, fully vaccinated foreign air travelers began to arrive in the U.S. for nonessential travel.
Asylum seekers continued to face expulsion, even though CBP had developed plans to vaccinate migrants "as part of a proposal to unwind" Title 42. CBP "declined to offer vaccines" to migrants in its custody for months, and just a small percentage were vaccinated—half of them unaccompanied children. There were steps in place to ensure that the migrant population could enter the U.S. vaccinated just as nonessential travelers must, but CBP resisted them. Title 42 stayed "due to concerns about the spread of the Delta variant and the political pressure faced by the administration over the high number of border crossings," according to Biden officials.
Biden's immigration issues do not start and end at the southern border. The administration let tens of thousands of employment-based green cards go to waste in fiscal year 2021, despite a massive application backlog. It was unprepared for the mass evacuation of vulnerable Afghans at every step, with hundreds of thousands still stuck in Afghanistan according to some advocate estimates. Routine processing at consulates and embassies around the world has been disrupted by the pandemic, and limited resources have demanded that officials focus on only the most urgent visa applications.
The U.S. immigration system has repeatedly failed migrants in 2021. Biden has had every opportunity to rescind Trump's cruel restrictions, but he's maintained many and even added to the stack. Biden has kept borders closed in punitive, often contradictory ways, and his officials haven't hesitated to back up those restrictions and violate their stated promises.
It's likely that immigration in 2022 will look like immigration in 2021. With the rise of the omicron variant, the Biden administration is once again trotting out restrictions on movement that have long been proven ineffective.
Still, it's important to remember that the U.S. immigration system was broken long before COVID-19 arrived on American soil. When bureaucrats can no longer point to the virus as the justification for their actions, the same inefficiencies that have always plagued immigration proceedings will still be there.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I disagree.
Orange Hitler built and ran literal concentration camps. He literally put kids in cages — which no Democrat would ever do. Biden liberated and dismantled those heinous facilities immediately after taking office.
#LibertariansForBiden
And all the photos of kids in cages that appeared in the media were taken during the Obama administration. At least get your basic facts correct.
"Joe Biden promised to do better by migrants upon taking office"
#AmericaLast
Reason fundamentally rejects government of the People, by the People, and for the People.
Can everybody please stop saying "literally?"It is a word that is completely over used.
Maybe tackle the exploding national debt before taking on millions of new international welfare cases every year. Maybe respect the rights and livelihoods of the US citizens over the wants of people fleeing self created hellholes. Fuck you you ignorant POS, it's not my job to support the world to enable your marxist utopia.
"enable your marxist utopia"
LOL
Koch-funded libertarians promote immigration because they know importing cheap labor will make Charles Koch (current net worth: $61,000,000,000) even richer. Making billionaires richer is literally the opposite of Marxism.
Shikha, is that you?
It's Irish Shikha.
ha ha!
https://reason.com/people/shikha-dalmia/
"Shikha Dalmia was a senior analyst at Reason Foundation."
*was*
Well Ding Dong, the Witch is Dead!
Glad to have lived to see the day.
The author of this piece seems to think that Biden should violate immigration law in favor of her preferred policies--as if the separation of powers didn't matter when it gets in the way of her preferred libertarian policies. Setting the rules of naturalization is a enumerated power of Congress. The president shouldn't just ignore the law, and no libertarian should advocate the president doing so.
One more time with feeling, the purpose of libertarianism is not to urge our officials to inflict libertarian policies on the unwilling. The purpose of libertarianism is to persuade our fellow Americans to demand libertarian policies. Advocating for Biden to inflict a libertarian immigration policy in violation of the law and over the objections of the voters isn't the libertarian solution to anything.
It's just elitism.
"The author of this piece seems to think that Biden should violate immigration law in favor of her preferred policies"
That's been Reason's policy for a while. That turd who writes the law columns here came out with an article advocating for libertarian judicial activism.
They're just all pomos at bottom these days. Justice is whatever they happen to want, and rule of law and representative democracy are totally squaresville, daddyo.
I guess I'm missing how unfettered immigration is a libertarian issue. Our immigration system needs serious changes, and Smokin Joe declaring open border to let in a couple million doesn't help it. Open borders are one thing to allow movement of trade, and allow visitors, but the idea that every poor person in the world that wants a bunch of free shit needs to be legalized isn't a position that seems very libertarian. Selling work visas to offset whatever setup costs as they settle, then they are on their own paying taxes with no safety net seems pretty libertarian, though.
As long as we don't enforce our borders, it matters little what our "immigration policy" is. Setting up a rational system for allowing foreign workers and immigrants into the country would just be theater if millions of aliens can just walk around it.
It isn’t the obligation of the United States to house the whole goddamn world.
It is according to Nick.
Invasion USA is @Reason's "core value", and if it takes socialism to get there, oh well.
@nickgillespie:
In the 21st century, libertarians are going to have make common cause with the globalists of all parties, with the people whose core value is the right of individuals to move freely around the planet.
...
Watching The Brink made me think that for all the other differences Reason has with the socialist magazine Jacobin, it may matter far more that we share a belief in open borders.
https://reason.com/2019/04/12/steve-bannons-economic-nationalism-is-th/
Joe Biden promised to do better by migrants upon taking office, but he fell short in 2021.
On the list of things that the President has a responsibility for, I'd put "Taking care of foreigners" about 283rd, right after "Making sure there are enough Diet Cokes available for the press at the news conferences".
Joe Biden promised to do better by migrants upon taking office, but he fell short in 2021.
How young and naive does one have to be to have believed this nonsense?
Well, a Reason writer/editor...So...
Has Billy Binion reached puberty yet?
A biographical article from Irish Shikha.
5 years old in 2005.
I wonder if they're paying her in gummy bears.
https://reason.com/2021/09/08/my-generation-inherited-the-aftermath-of-9-11/
In the dead of summer in 2005, my family moved to a small town near Shanksville, Pennsylvania...
On that day in Shanksville, my first interaction with the aftermath of 9/11, I was five years old.
If you're reading this column, you really need to read this book.
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B09CMWTMFR/reasonmagazinea-20/
The Federal Laws are already in place.
Follow them...No aid or welfare, deportation and incarceration for those previously expelled.
Good fences make good neighbors.
A mere 5 million illegal migrants this year. Shocking! It should be at least 50 million.
You misspelled great
Incidentally, the legitimate purpose of the U.S. immigration system, like the legitimate purpose of everything else the government odes, is to protect our rights.
I strongly believe that immigration is of great benefit to the United States, our economy, and our people, and we really need to sell immigration in those terms.
People who think the purpose of the immigration system is to benefit immigrants are like people who think the legitimate purpose of the government is to benefit welfare recipients.
It ain't libertarian, and it ain't capitalist.
There are no means to libertarian ends without persuading people to embrace libertarian policies willingly.
"Immigration is a benefit, but one that turns upon the quality of the immigrant."
Labor is a resource, and having more of a resource available to the economy is better for the economy. If an excess of labor were bad for economic growth, then the slowest growing economy in the world, over the last 20 years, must have been China's. Welfare and socialist aren't in the best interests of the economy, but that is and should be a separate issue.
People who oppose immigration because they imagine it means more people on welfare should be opposing the welfare system anyway--for Americans and immigrants--and people who genuinely want more low skilled immigration should be opposed to welfare--if welfare is the reason so many other people oppose low skilled immigration.
"How do you persuade people to embrace an ideological framework that cannot produce results?"
Are you afraid that libertarian capitalism won't produce results?
I'm not. That's an excellent way to persuade people to embrace libertarian capitalism--because we want the results.
No question that some people who are enriching themselves off of big government will lose big in a more libertarian and capitalist world. People who are paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to work in government bureaucracy doing things that no one would be willing to pay for if it weren't for fear of the IRS--those people will not be better off. They should oppose us tooth and nail.
People doing honest work, who lose their jobs, will find many more and better opportunities. If all the earned revenue our economy squanders on public spending and welfare benefits were kept by consumers and businesses instead, there would be far fewer people doing honest work that found themselves unemployed, and those that did find themselves unemployed would find many more opportunities than there are now.
Yeah, the low cost of unskilled labor is also a consideration--like the low cost of energy. And being low cost is a plus for the economy as a whole.
Discovering an abundance of natural gas was not good news for the coal miners, since natural gas requires less labor to extract, process, and transport.
Discovering an abundance of natural gas was good news for the economy, and cheap labor works like that, too. An abundance of cheap unskilled labor is bad news for alcoholics and people with a felony conviction.
It's good news for the economy.
Any time you hear the words "cheap labor", it means "you're descendants will be paying for it through the nose in perpetuity".
Libertarianism and Marxism were both invented by economists, so that shouldn't be a surprise.
Given that no one can name a single useful thing ever developed by economists, that ought to give more people pause for thought, particularly in a time when virtually every assumption made by the economists is being demonstrated as catastrophically wrong.
Yes, we need to keep importing human meat widgets because the more meat widgets, the more prosperous, right?
Just look at China and India! So many people! So much prosperity and freedom! Don't you want to be just as prosperous as that?
America is not a place, it's a people. If Americans all got raptured tomorrow, and twice as many people moved in, what chance they would be twice as prosperous? Twice as free?
America's wealth is fundamentally in its people - their culture and their values. The political culture and values of America are an extreme outlier in the political cultures of the world. Or at least were.
My father from Nebraska was outraged at seatbelt laws. How many immigrants today would share that outrage over that government violation of personal autonomy? How many of them had fathers who felt the same way?
Import Not Americans, become Not America.