DEA Agrees With Me About Medical Marijuana
Today the Drug Enforcement Administration issued a statement suggesting that the Justice Department's new medical marijuana guidelines will not amount to much in practice:
These guidelines do not legalize marijuana. It is not the practice or policy of DEA to target individuals with serious medical conditions who comply with state laws authorizing the use of marijuana for medical purposes. Consistent with the DOJ guidelines, we will continue to identify and investigate any criminal organization or individual who unlawfully grows, markets or distributes marijuana or other dangerous drugs.
You could dismiss this stance as an attempt to save face. But as I argued here last week (and in my syndicated column this week), disagreements about who is allowed to grow and distribute medical marijuana and under what circumstances, especially in California, will continue to provide excuses for DEA raids. It's true that the agency, by and large, has not targeted "individuals with serious medical conditions who comply with state laws authorizing the use of marijuana for medical purposes." Instead it has targeted the people who supply those patients with marijuana (who often are patients themselves). With the possible exception of a "primary caregiver" who grows a few plants for a particular patient and does not charge for the service, it's not clear that the DEA or the Justice Department is prepared to tolerate any method of providing marijuana to patients who are not up to growing it for themselves.
Steve Chapman comments on the medical marijuana guidelines here. My column on the subject is available at Town Hall here.
[Thanks to LEAP's Tom Angell for the tip.]
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm sure they are capable of finding a clause in any state law that will allow them to continue "business as usual."
Cue SWAT raid in 3 . 2 . 1 ...
In short - nothing is going to change. This is just more feel-good bullshit to help Obama's sagging popularity ratings.
...and all the liberaltarians continue to sing praises to Obama for his courageous Change to the War on Drugs.
Dear Brandybuck...as a Christian Conservative I fully support medical marijuana; so don't blame the "liberaltarians" as the only group that wants this issue decided in favor of medical marijuana. You call yourself Brandybuck..so, I guess that you are a male, who supports the good old boys and girls getting drunk and driving home killing someone on the way. Don't put down the use of medical marijuana until you have tried it yourself. You just don't know what you don't know about this subject. God made this world and placed healing herbs to heal the sick and needy. Marijuana oil is the original "Oil of Joy" given to those who mourn. So honor the Lord your God and accept what he gives with joy in our hearts and love for our fellowmen and women who are in ill health.
If the City of L.A. issues business licenses to cannibus clubs and collects taxes from them aren't they also involved in any criminal conspiracy?
On the other side of the coin, I don't believe that there have been DEA raids of medical compassion centers/co-ops in any states other than California.
California really needs to tax and regulate marijuana or re-write their medical law - their 10 sentence skeleton of a law leaves patients open to abuse from both cops and unscrupulous businessmen. The shit show out there has made reform more difficult to achieve in many other states.
A person has to be really sick to want to ingest a dangerous drug like marijuana!
Um, on second thought, let me rephrase that ...
"DEA Agrees With Me About Medical Marijuana"
fyi, that's not something to brag about, Jacob
Good that means we can continue our sadistic LEO porn.
I need to remember to review some of that for the blog. Thank you!
It's hard to believe anything the DEA says when they can't even identify which drugs are dangerous.
All drugs are dangerous, even the placebos.
The NJ gubernatorial race is close here. Obama staked his reputation on the outcome. The posters here have Obama in the middle and Corzine standing to the side behind him. Expect several speeches from Obama that would appeal to the NJ base from now until election day.
For example, talking about easing the drug war. We'll see what happens the second week of November.
I knew that "it will not be a priority" was nothing more than obamaspeak.
Nothing's gonna change. Nothing.
How, exactly, does the DEA get away with non-enforcement of Federal Law? I'm all for repealing drug laws and such, but until that day arrives I don't see how selective enforcement is effective and survives the test of time. If Obama had any conviction on this (balls, if you will) then they would push to change the law. This is the pussy's way...
I think that's part of the point. Obama wants to make sure that marijuana users depend on him being in the White House to avoid arrest.
If Obama had any conviction on this (balls, if you will) then they would push to change the law.
Who, Mr. Voting Present? Balls?
AHAHAHAHahaha.
So basically, these pigs are just announcing that they are going to do whatever the fuck they want, just as they always have?