Some Preliminary Thoughts on the Kavanaugh Nomination [Updated with additional material]
Judge Kavanaugh is a highly qualified jurist. I applaud several aspects of his record, while having reservations about others.
Judge Kavanaugh is a highly qualified jurist. I applaud several aspects of his record, while having reservations about others.
Initial thoughts on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court
The text, history, and tradition methodology applied to D.C.'s unusually restrictive gun laws.
A history lesson for Chris Matthews and others who claim there was a tradition of requiring 60 votes for confirmation.
Scalia thought the question of disparate impact liability's constitutionality was a difficult one that sooner or later would need to be addressed. The Trump Administration needs to take it seriously.
Prosecutors in southern Utah have argued that they can prove that the closing of a corral gate was the crime of attempted wanton destruction of livestock by pointing to a defendant's membership in a conservation organization. Today I argue to the Utah Court of Appeals that it should review the First Amendment implications of the prosecutors' maneuver.
Justice Kennedy's decision forcing states to recognize same-sex marriage is not at risk
The Roberts Court has overturned precedents at a lower rate than its predecessors. Will this soon change?
We pride ourselves on having abolished the hereditary privileges once associated with aristocracy. But our citizenship system replicates many of the same evils.
President Trump will soon name his second pick to the Supreme Court
Objector blackmail, John Doe summonses, and inappropriate commentary from the bench.
I don't have answers, but I have a lot of questions.
So holds this morning's important Wisconsin Supreme Court decision, by a 4-2 vote.
The ruling is just the start of what may be a prolonged legal battle over immigration and federalism.
The Declaration of Independence makes the case for a political system based on universal principles of liberty and equality, not ethnic nationalism. Those principles are as relevant as ever in our troubled times.
It formally identified the political theory of the United States: securing the individual rights of We the People
The 1876 Colorado Constitution affirms and elucidates the principles of 1776.
Amicus brief says that 8th Amendment's ban on "excessive fines" does not have a corporate loophole.
Current liberal court-packing proposals are dangerously misguided - and for much the same reasons as last year's conservative court-packing plan.
Episode 224 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Amicus brief explains that States cannot compel presidential electors to vote a certain way.
Iowa Supreme Court majority and dissenting opinions canvass the state of the law.
A surfeit of text messages, a glut of voicemails, and a mass strip search of choir girls.
Judge Ellis rejects Paul Manafort's attacks on the legitimacy of the Mueller Investigation. Steve Calabresi argues that, even if Mueller were an inferior officer, his appointment would still violate the Appointments Clause.
A ruling under the state constitution, but still really interesting.
Do you really want President Trump to pick a nonoriginalist Justice?
Supreme Court denies cert in DuPont v. Smiley
How much deference should amicus briefs and agency advocacy receive from the courts?
The Supreme Court has agreed to reconsider the "separate sovereigns" exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause -- and Justices Ginsburg and Thomas seem to both be on the defendant's side.
This term, it was Roberts; #2 was Gorsuch
The question that the Court didn't resolve in Lozman v. Riviera-Beach is back, in another case on which the Supreme Court just granted review.
A conversation with Eugene Volokh about what's legal to publish and why-plus doxxing, lock picking, source protection, and more.
"[A] soldier who willfully communicates information relating to the national defense 'is not entitled to invoke the First Amendment as a shield to immunize his act of thievery.'"
Cell extractions, teeth extractions, and Mind Your Business.
No, says the Iowa Supreme Court, rejecting the claim that such statements (labeled "counterculture practices" by the plaintiffs) were libelous or negligent.
But it took a federal court order.
What are the chances the justices will consider Brendan Dassey's cert petition cert worthy?
... enforce it in the U.S. using the official bolivar-dollar exchange rate -- but you can't, at least in New York.
"When a person voluntarily accepts a 'friend' request on Facebook from an undercover police officer, and then exposes incriminating evidence...the Fourth Amendment [does not] protect against this mistaken trust."
A familiar idea "easily understood from our daily experience" -- or is it?
Judges split on whether printing "In God We Trust" on currency imposes a substantial burden under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.