What Constitutional Lawyers can Learn from Spiderman
Constitutional law could be improved by taking account of the principle that "with great power, comes great responsibility."
Constitutional law could be improved by taking account of the principle that "with great power, comes great responsibility."
Civil disgorgement, mild chastisement, and a Third Amendment.
Environmental Protection Agency
A discussion on how to reform federal environmental policy.
So holds the Florida Supreme Court (by a 4-3 vote).
The latest in the Brummer v. Wey (TheBlot) litigation, brought by Prof. Christopher Brummer, a former Obama nominee for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
The People of New Hampshire have spoken! But what have they said?
Legal scholar Eric Segall argues originalism doesn't qualify as a constitutional theory because originalists disagree on too many things. His case is overstated. But if it's correct, the same criticism applies to living constitutionalism.
Conservative and libertarian lawyers are joining together to speak out in defense of constitutional governance, traditional legal norms, and the rule of law.
Jonathan beat me to posting about this, but I agree entirely with his post.
President Trump announces a superlative pick for to replace Brett Kavanaugh on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
A link to my review of an important new book on property rights by Cornell law Professor Gregory Alexander.
A funny line from David Burge (iowahawkblog) about Rep.-Elect Ocasio-Cortez joining "youth activist" sit-in in Nancy Pelosi's office.
My co-authored amicus brief urges the Supreme Court to review the issue of whether Arizona can deny bail to accused sex offenders where "proof" of sexual assault "is evident or the presumption great."
But what does that mean? Readers, tell me what you think, and how it fits with your general theory of constitutional interpretation (e.g., textualism, originalism, etc.).
... extends to public high school students, holds a federal judge in Wisconsin.
Why we should not let fears about inequality stand in the way of technological progress that could potentially make the next generation healthier, happier, and smarter.
So reports the Times of London, which was the target of the purported order.
Democracy is clearly superior to despotism. But libertarians are still right to worry about voter ignorance and advocate tighter constraints on government power.
Why first principles suggest that Matthew Whitaker's acting appointment is invalid, but precedent and practice might suggest the opposite.
An interesting motion for a temporary restraining order, arguing based on the First Amendment, the dormant Commerce Clause, 47 U.S.C. § 230, and more.
Why both the dissent and majority in Janus were wrong, and what the next lawsuits may look like.
Dinosaur mortal combat, the hose treatment, and the great high school impostor.
Living constitutionalists argue that their methodology allows us to improve constitutional law over time. But what if it actually makes it worse? Legal scholar Ernest Young raises that very question in an important new article.
On Tuesday, voters in six states approved Crime Victims' Rights Amendments, continuing a long-term trend towards expanding the crime victim's role in the criminal justice process
Donald Trump says exactly the wrong thing in response to a question about anti-Semitism, mainstream Jew-haters Jew-hate, and a new study shows that bigotry has declined under Trump.
Democratic control of the House, the passage of marijuana legalization referenda in three states, and the removal of Jeff Sessions presage a brighter future for legalized pot.
The debate over the sexual assault accusations against Brett Kavanaugh is a striking example of partisan bias at work.
A conservative publication had already filed such a motion; Ellison is the candidate for Minnesota Attorney General, and Deputy Chair of the Democratic National Committee.
The case of a woman who may be prosecuted for sheltering animals during Hurricane Florence highlights some reasons why it is often wrong to enforce the law.
Sacred pachyderms, boating while Latino, and police misconduct insurance.
A woman's case against the defendants who arranged the prosecution (a police department captain, who was her ex-husband and the target of her speech, and his friend who was a police investigator) can go forward.
When she did post such a photo, she was arrested and prosecuted -- a remarkable case from two years ago, which I just learned about.
More on their unconstitutionality.
The Supreme Court has not resolved transgender students' rights to access restrooms-but it won't stay that way for long.
The government may not discriminate against businesses because of the political views the business (or its spokesman) has expressed.
The 1982 decision prevented a Texas measure from becoming dominant, thus ensuring access to school for undocumented minors throughout the nation.
Liberal ideas can result in racism, but not for the reasons leftist scholars have posited.
A 1977 opinion allowed public school educators to strike students as punishment for infractions, and the archaic practice persists today.
My amicus brief with Stephen Sachs in Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt