Commonsense Suspicion: Thoughts on Kansas v. Glover
The Supreme Court rules in an interesting Fourth Amendment case.
The Supreme Court rules in an interesting Fourth Amendment case.
... but only by wrongly downplaying, I think, the degree to which the law interferes with Second Amendment rights.
On appeal, Ohio interpreted the limit (part of a temporary ban on all "non-essential" surgeries and procedures) as not banning abortions when "any delay will jeopardize the woman's right to obtain an abortion," but only as delaying earlier-term abortions that can be delayed—but it apparently hadn't made that argument in the trial court.
Episode 310 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Judge Dan Hinde explains the role of Texas courts during times of pandemics
Putting people who dislike and distrust the government in charge of the government is a risky business, and we are paying the price for it now.
Today, Judge Judge Timothy M. Witkowiak refused to issue the injunction, partly on prior restraint grounds. The election is scheduled for tomorrow.
and the media can still ask school officials about them—"if the statute is broadly applied in an attempt to bar the Media Defendants' right to question sources, then the statutory language assuredly violates the First Amendment."
What is the source of the federal government's "police power" to "take" property without "just compensation"?
when everyone is potentially lethal to others, without any individual choice on anyone's part.
are generally constitutional (whether they forbid travel to a particular place, or require travelers to be temporarily quarantined).
This world is our new normal. We are not going back.
If law students can run a moot court tournament through video conference, I'd think appellate courts can too.
is apparently based on constitutionally protected expressions of opinion.
Poppy seed chips, the Codfather, and secret lynching records.
Heard's Washington Post op-ed didn't mention Depp, but the judge concludes that in context it would be seen as implying factual assertions about him.
"The Lunada Bay Boys are alleged to be a group of young and middle-aged men, local to Palos Verdes Estates, who consider themselves to be the self-appointed guardians of Lunada Bay. One of their tenets is to keep outsiders away from the surf location through threats and violence."
rejecting Fourth Amendment and substantive due process arguments against it.
The Contraception Mandate is back at the Supreme Court
Wearing improvised masks in public will help defeat the viral invasion
I vouch for absolutely none of this.
A post by Prof. Jane Bambauer (Arizona) forthcoming at Truth on the Market, which she graciously let me reblog.
The Sheriff's position cites the Department of Homeland Security advisory (though it's not strictly binding on him); gun stores will still have to follow the social distancing requirements applicable to other stores that remain open.
No, the FDA has not approved a 2-minute serologic test for Covid-19 antibodies
Up from 558 yesterday, which was itself a record.
See the URL below, as promised in my mark-your-calendars post Sunday.
So says a federal district court, citing three articles by our own Orin Kerr.
"The Court will allow the federal government to try again and explain which enumerated power justifies the federal regulation and whether it allows a taking without compensation."
States have so far taken the lead in battling the coronavirus, and there is some merit to this decentralized approach, which fits the original meaning of the Constitution. But it also has flaws, and there is still a good chance the crisis will ultimately lead to an expansion of federal power.