No Liability for Parents Over Their Son's Surreptitiously Recording Sex Acts in Their Home
"Suing individuals because they have a homeowner's insurance policy or are collectible defendants is not a proper purpose for a lawsuit."
"Suing individuals because they have a homeowner's insurance policy or are collectible defendants is not a proper purpose for a lawsuit."
court holds in Speedway Bomber Brett Kimberlin's lawsuit.
Thousands of lawsuits alleging Roundup causes cancer are likely dead after Supreme Court Monsanto ruling.
"[P]laintiffs have failed to respond to the City's evidence that changes in its policies have actually improved conditions in the Tenderloin such that Plaintiffs are no longer at risk of the harms they cited in their motion."
"Plaintiff has not alleged that Defendants' conduct caused a mental condition in which Mr. McBreairty could not control his suicidal impulses."
Whatever the merits of climate tort suits (or lack thereof), the argument they are preempted does not hold up.
Using tort law for environmental protection has a deeper historical pedigree than does resort to administrative regulation.
Another reply to the former attorney general on climate litigation that may end up in the Supreme Court.
"[V]ery agreeable to the theorist, but utterly unfit for the practical purposes of society ...."
Penny McCarthy is suing the federal agents who insisted she was a fugitive despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
A federal court in Florida will consider whether chatbot output is First Amendment-protected speech.
"A manufacturer of goods is not an accomplice to every unaffiliated retailer whom it fails to make follow the law."
In this post, I'll talk about the court's analysis tentatively rejecting the First Amendment defense, an analysis that I think is mistaken (whether or not some tort claims such as these should be allowed despite the First Amendment).
So the Missouri Court of Appeals concludes, in allowing a negligence/design defect case to proceed against Lyft, based on a driver's having been murdered by riders who "fraudulently and anonymously request[ed]" a ride.
Mexico's amici take shots at our brief in Smith and Wesson v. Mexico
Curtrina Martin's petition attracted support from a bipartisan group of lawmakers.
The justices are not persuaded to intervene in state-law climate litigation.
Fort the answer—or rather, answers—a court has to resolve a choice of law question.
The court also concluded defendant had libeled plaintiff, but the court held that even the nonlibelous expressions of opinion could lead to emotional distress liability. The total verdict of $6.8M.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.