Public Opinion About Abortion Is Complex and Sometimes Confused
Americans cannot be neatly divided into two sides, and they do not necessarily understand the implications of Roe v. Wade.
Americans cannot be neatly divided into two sides, and they do not necessarily understand the implications of Roe v. Wade.
The abortion precedent has faced withering criticism, including damning appraisals by pro-choice legal scholars, for half a century.
Plus: ruminations on public health, misinformation, and media literacy
The constitutional scholar on abortion, Sam Alito, and the future of federalism
The forgotten abortion politics of the pre-Roe era
For libertarians who see unborn babies as innocent rights-bearing individuals, reducing the number of lives ended by abortion brings us closer to our credo.
That fact doesn't necessarily justify overruling Roe. Depending on how it's viewed, the history of such reversals may even counsel against further such moves.
What the Alito draft tells us about a possible future for same-sex marriage.
Various experts, including co-blogger Josh Blackman and myself, discuss whether the draft opinion would threaten other constitutional rights, if adopted by the Court.
The answer to this important question is highly uncertain. I tentatively predict a significant, but still modest, increase in abortion-driven migration.
Does returning decisions about abortion to the states increase liberty or shrink it?
Although recent polls show a majority thinks the abortion precedent should be preserved, some respondents seem confused about what that would mean.
Fewer Americans would be forced to live under a legal regime, imposed from on high, that is contrary to their convictions on a matter of life and death.
Abortion is likely to remain legal in most states, and workarounds will mitigate the effects of bans.
If the leaker's identity is ever revealed, he or she will face serious professional and reputational sanctions. There's no need to wish for criminal punishments too.
Gorsuch just penned an important pro-LGBT decision two years ago. Americans are largely not interested in relitigating this issue.
Although a Texas Supreme Court ruling ended the main challenge to the law, other cases could ultimately block its enforcement.
The experience in Texas shows that workarounds pose daunting obstacles to such laws.
Federal regulators have permanently lifted a requirement that mifepristone be dispensed in person.
Would the outcome in Dobbs put originalism in doubt?
The actual number of abortions that S.B. 8 prevented by the end of September may be closer to 500 than 3,000.
The experience with the Texas Heartbeat Act offers a preview of what that means.
S.B. 8 allows lawsuits against people who perform prohibited abortions even if they relied on a court's determination that the law is unconstitutional.
It's the one amicus brief supporting Mississippi's abortion restriction that takes a wrecking ball to the Supreme Court's fundamental-rights precedents
For the most part, supporters of Mississippi's abortion ban in the Supreme Court are steering clear of Obergefell
Alan Braid says he broke the law, which prohibits the vast majority of abortions, to make sure it would be tested in court.
S.B. 8 relies on litigation tricks that conservatives have long condemned as a threat to the rule of law.
Because the Supreme Court so far has not intervened, post-heartbeat abortions are now illegal in the Lone Star State.
National surveys obscure large regional variations in public opinion about abortion limits.
While overturning Roe v. Wade would lead to new restrictions in many states, legal access to abortion would be unaffected in most of the country.
Plus: Wisconsin may approve microschools, what will Biden Title IX guidance look like, and more...
Plus: North Carolina sues eight more e-cig companies, Tulsi Gabbard fails to meet debate threshold, and more...
No more baseball fight-style standoffs in the abortion wars. Plus: so-called constitutional crises, Bernie's credit paternalism, and GoT redux on the Reason Podcast.
In a 5-4 decision, the Court issued a temporary stay of a Louisiana law that could put abortion doctors out of business.