Analysis: Obama Doesn't Seem to See Problems with NSA
Did he even read the part where the FISA court didn't know how certain processes worked for years?
Did he even read the part where the FISA court didn't know how certain processes worked for years?
David Miranda was detained for nine hours at Heathrow Airport where some of his electronic equipment was seized
Except that, today, it's worse
Constantly finds its old lies outdated and superseded by the need for new lies
So, basically, all of the official denials have been lies
Data can only be copied, shared, or inspected for national security reasons
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) calling for closing of loopholes that allow for warrantless searches of Americans' communications
FISA Court memo release shows the overseeing agency didn't know all the details of how surveillance actually worked
Even though destroying hard drives didn't destroy the widely disseminated data
Heavily redacted, but still somewhat readable
For a period of six months around the event
USA Today/Pew Research poll shows that 60 percent of 18- to 29- year olds believe exposing surveillance programs served the public good
Cabinet Secretary Jeremy Heywood got in touch with the newspaper
More than has been publicly acknowledged
Or rather, it finds it "difficult to imagine a scenario" in which they would.
Metadata can't be protected, says Silent Circle executive
Since they wanted information about inconvenient journalism
Even after they were told the data was backed up around the world
They already said there are no privacy concerns
How about some on theirs, too?
Why are they defending an agency that may even be concealing information from them?
It's OK, American officials have done bad enough, already
Lawmakers are a little better informed than in the past
David Miranda was detained for nine hours at Heathrow airport
Applying a little pressure over spying revelations?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks